(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 629-641 | Article Number: ijese.2017.042
Published Online: May 28, 2017
Abstract
Entrepreneurship learning and training are tedious and rising educated unemployment of higher education graduates. For this reason, an alternative solution is done by higher education through Science and Technology Program for Entrepreneurship. This research aims to explore and describe the correlation analysis between entrepreneurial potential with the personality of students in science and technology for the implementation of entrepreneurship in higher education. The correlation analysis is to obtain preliminary information about the correlation between personality qualities and entrepreneurial potential of students involved in the implementation of science and technology for entrepreneurship in higher education. The research method used was quantitative research which was conducted through questionnaire distributed to 46 students in higher education in order to obtain information about the potential of entrepreneurship and personality of each student after the questionnaire being validated and normal. Next, the data were tabulated and then being analyzed to see the correlation between both variables by using software SPSS V.20. The result of correlation analysis showed 0.589 which meant a positive and significant relationship between personality variables with entrepreneurial potential variables, both at the level of 0.05 and at the level of 0.01, as well as the strength of the correlation is at a medium level. This meant that if an individual's personality is better or in other word is very strong, the entrepreneurial potential will also be very strong. Thus, the implementation of science and technology for entrepreneurship undertaken will provide maximum results towards the entrepreneurial spirit of students in higher education. Besides that, the implementation of science and technology activities for entrepreneurship students are expected to push the unemployment rate of educated, so the students who graduate from college can develop entrepreneurship potential through their own business and able to create job vacancies.
Keywords: Entrepreneurship Potential, personality, Science and Technology for Entrepreneurship
References
Andruhina, T.V., Dorozhkin, E.M., Zaitseva, E.V., Komleva, S.V., Sosnin, A.S. & Savinova , V.A. (2016). Scientific-Theoretical Background the Organization of Geobotany Employees of the Micro Enterprises Sport and Recreation Sector. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(17), 9773-9785
Brenner, O.C., C.D. Pringle and J.H. Greenhaus. (1991). Perceived fulfilment of organizational employment versus entrepreneurship: work values and career intentions of business college graduates. Journal of Small Business Management, 29 (3), 62–74.
Ememe, O. N. & Undie, J. (2010). The need for the development of Entrepreneurship Education job creation skills in students in Eastern Nigerian Universities. Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 1(1)
Fiet, J. (2000). The pedagogical side of entrepreneurship theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 101–17.
Fleming, P. (1994). The role of structured interventions in shaping graduate entrepreneurship. Irish Business and Administrative Research, 15, 146–57.
Fomin, E.P., Alekseev, A.A., Fomina, N.E., Rensh, M.A. & Zaitseva, E.V. (2016). Intuition in Business: Empirical Base. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15), 8228-8236.
Ganefri and Hidayat, Hendra. (2015). Production based Learning: An Instructional Design Model in the Context of Vocational Education and Training (VET). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 206-211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.142
Ganefri, Hendra Hidayat, Indrati Kusumaningrum, Mega Silfia Dewy and Sartika Anori, (2017). Learning Outcomes in Vocational Study: A Development of Product Based Learning Model. The Social Sciences, 12: 831-838. doi: 10.3923/sscience.2017.831.838
Ganefri. (2013). The Development of Production-Based Learning Approach to Entrepreneurial Spirit for Engineering Students. Journal Asian Social Science, 9(12), 162-167. doi: 10.5539/ass.v9n12p162
Hart, M. and R. Harrison. (1992). Encouraging enterprise in Northern Ireland: constraints and opportunities. Irish Business and Administrative Research, 13, 104–16.
Hidayat, Hendra. (2017). Impact of Learning with the Production-Based Learning Model in Vocational School. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Social Sciences, 7(2), 1-6. http://indusedu.org/pdfs/IJRESS/IJRESS_1057_92032.pdf
Kirby, D. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: can business schools meet the challenge?. EducationþTraining, 46(8/9), 10-19
Kolvereid, L. (1996). Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20 (3), 47–57.
Kusumaningrum, I., Ganefri & Hidayat, H. (2015). Improving Students’ Entrepreneurial Interest using Production Based Learning Model in TVET. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 14, 69-74. doi: 10.2991/ictvet-14.2015.17
Kusumaningrum, I., Hidayat, H., Ganefri, , Anori, S. & Dewy, M.S. (2016). Learning Outcomes in Vocational Education: a Business Plan Development by Production-Based Learning Model Approach. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), 11917-11930.
Kydyrova, Z.S., Satymbekova, K.B., Kerimbek, G.E., Imanbayeva, Z.O., Saparbayeva, S.S., Nurgalieva, A.A., Ilyas, A.A., Zhalbinova, S.K., Jrauova, K.S. & Kanafina, a.A.T. (2016). Entrepreneurship Development and Business Climate of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 6381-6394.
Matley, H. (2005a). Entrepreneurship education in the United Kingdom business schools: conceptual, contextual and policy considerations. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(4), 627-43
Matley, H. (2005b). Researching entrepreneurship and education, Part 1: What is entrepreneurship and does it matter?, Education Training, 48(8/9), 665-77
McKeown, J., Millman, C., Sursani, S.R., Smith, K. and Martin, L.M. (2006). Graduate entrepreneurship education in the United Kingdom. EducationþTraining, 48(8/9), 597-613
McMullan, W. and Long, W. (1987). Entrepreneurship education in the 1990s. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 61-75
Nugroho, Wahyu. (2015). 495.143 Sarjana Menganggur. Online. http://www.harnas.co/2015/02/06/495143-sarjana-menganggur
Romantsev, G.M., Efanov, A.V., Moiseev, A.V., Bychkova, E.Y., Karpova, N.P. & Tidemann, B. (2016). Craft training in Russia: theory and practice of development. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 7154-7165.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003. Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Penerbit: BP Citra Jaya. Jakarta.
Zimmerer, W. Thomas m. Scarborough. (1996). Entrepreneurship and The New Venture Formation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Inc. 14-17