(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 607-616 | Article Number: ijese.2017.040
Published Online: May 28, 2017
Abstract
A research on primary school education in the frame of education for sustainable development, as known as ESD, is important because the awareness of eco-friendly activities and environment empowerment cannot be developed in a short time. Meanwhile, human activities have caused significant environmental degradation. This is an exploratory study involving 240 participants from four primary schools in Semarang by applying stratified simple random sampling. The data were processed using a two-way test ANOVA and Partially Least Square. This study has found that primary school students in Semarang has a good understanding about the pillars of natural, social and ego in sustainable development. But, there are insignificant differences on the student understanding between class levels about eco-friendly issues. When the education level is higher, the students' understanding on eco-friendly education is not better. This research also has revealed that the school accreditation is insignificant to influence the students in understanding the eco-friendly issues. However, the knowledge stages in ESD innovation diffusion are applied. Therefore, the pattern of education which emphasized the students' knowledge on ESD is still relevant in building eco-friendly behavior.
Keywords: education for sustainable development, eco-friendly education, primary school, innovation diffusion
References
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
Burck, J., Marten, F., & Bals, C. (2015). The Climate Change Performance Index: Result 2015. Think Tank & Research (Vol. 1). Bonn. Retrieved from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx\nhttps://books.google.com.vn/books?id=-VDVygAACAAJ\nhttp://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/status_of_ratification/items/2613.php\nhttps://luatminhkhue.vn/other/decision-no-1775-qd-ttg-dated-november-21,-2012-of-the-p
Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2009). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate&postgraduate students (3rd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Forehand, M. (2005). Bloom ’ s Taxonomy : Original and Revised.
Frantz, C. M., & Mayer, F. S. (2014). The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 85–89. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.001
Konservasi Unnes. (2014). Bahan Ajar Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup. Retrieved May 14, 2014, from http://konservasi.unnes.ac.id/
Lavanya, B., & Saraswathi, S. (2014). Education for Sustainable Development. In National Conference on Management and Social Sciences – Its Impact on Sustainable Development (pp. 132–136).
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Pedoman Pengembangan Muatan Lokal, 81A Tahun 2013 tentang Implementasi Kurikulum 1–9 (2013).
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Muatan Lokal Kurikulum 2013 (2014). Indonesia. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Nasibulina, A. (2015). Education for Sustainable Development and Environmental Ethics, 214(June), 1077–1082. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.708
Nomura, K. (2009). A perspective on education for sustainable development: Historical development of environmental education in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(6), 621–627. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.12.002
Reid, W. V., Mooney, H. A., Cropper, A., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S. R., Chopra, K., … Zurek, M. B. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being. Ecosystems (Vol. 5). Washington, DC: Island Press. http://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1439.003
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. New York.
Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed Review of Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory and Educational Technology-Related Studies Based on Rogers’ Theory. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 14–23.
Suduc, A. M., Bîzoi, M., & Gorghiu, G. (2014). Sustainable Development in Romania in Pre-school and Primary Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1187–1192. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.367
UNESCO. (2014). Education for Sustainable Development. Retrieved May 14, 2014, from http://www.unesco.org