This research aims to determine the feasibility and effectivity of mobile learning based Worked Example in Electric Circuits (WEIEC) application in improving the high school students’ electric circuits interpretation ability on Direct Current Circuits materials. The research method used was a combination of Four-D Models and ADDIE model. The research design used was a pretest-posttest control group design using quantitative approach. The data collection instruments in this research were non-test and test instruments. The non-test instruments consist of product feasibility instrument, materials feasibility instrument, and preliminary field testing instrument. The test instruments were the pretest and post test data. The data analysis technique used was Aiken’s V to assess the product quality of the WEIEC application and General Linear Model (GLM) Mixed Design test to determine the students’ electric circuit interpretation ability improvement. The research subject were 9 experts judgement, 35 senior high school students of class XII for the preliminary field testing and 74 students for the main field testing. Research results showed that the developed WEIEC Application was considered feasible to use in terms of materials aspect assessment with the Aiken’s V score of 0.80, media aspect with the Aiken’s V score of 0.80 and preliminary field testing results on the students with the Aiken’s V score of 0.81. The developed WEIEC application could improve the electric circuit interpretation ability based on the Mean Difference (MD) score of -28,811 with 85.8% effectivity based on Partial Eta Squared in Multivariate Test.

Atkinson, R.K., Derry, S.J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D.W. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181–214.

Bilal, E., Erol, M. (2009). Investigating Students conceptions of Some Electricity Concepts. American Journa of Physics Education, 3(2).

Chu, S. T., & Rau, D. C.(2010).Applying math problem-solving competence indicators and its weight-value engineering problems. http://120.114.52.144/jspui/handle/123456789/1204.

Danaher, P. A., Moriarty, B. J., & Danaher, G. R. (2009). Mobile Learning Communities: Creating New educational Futures. New York, NY : Routledge

El-Hussein, M.O.M., & Cronje, J.C. (2010). Defining Mobile Learning in the Higher Education Landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 12-21.

Engelhardt, P.V., & Beichner, R.J. (2004). Students Understanding of Direct Current Resistive Electrical Circuits. American Association of Physics Teachers, 72, 98-115.

Gerven Van, P.W.m., Paas, F.G.W.C., & Merrienboer, J.J.G., et al. (2002). Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency. Permagon, 12, 87–105.

Gog, T.V., Liesbeth, K, & Paas, F. (2011). Effects of Worked Examples, Example-Problem Pairs, and Problem-Example Pairs Compared to Problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 212-218.

Gog, T.V., Paas, F., & Merrienboer Van, J.J.G. (2006). Effects of process-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer peformance. Learning and Instruction, 16, 154-164.

Iqbal, S., & Qureshi, I.A. (2012). M-Learning Adoption: A Prespective From a Developing Country. The International review of research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 148-162.

Jennifer L. Docktor & José P. Mestre. (2014). Synthesis of Discipline-based Education Research in Physics. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 10, 020119.

Jill Marshall. (2008). Student’s creation and Interpretation of Circuit diagrams. Electronic Journal of science Education Vol. 12 No. 2.

Kay, K. (2010). 21st century skills: Why they matter, what they are, and how we get there. Foreword in: 21st Century Skills: Rethinking how students learn, J. Bellanca and R. Brandt (eds.)  US: Learning Tree.

Kennedy, D. M., & Mc Naught, C. (2001). Computer-based cognitive tools: Description and design. In Montgomerie, C., & J. Viteli (Eds), ED-MEDIA 2001, 925-930. Proceedings of the 13th Annual World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Tampere, Finland, 25-30 June. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education (AACE).

Li, J., & Singh, C. (2016). Students’ common difficulties and approaches while solving conceptual problems with non identical light bulbs in seriesr and parallel. European Journal of Physics, 37. doi : 10.1088/0143-0807/37/6/065708.

Lynnette. (2013). Development Of Mobile Learning Using Android Platform. International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science (IJITCS), 9(1), 98-106.

McDermott, L.C., & Shaffer, P.S. (1992). Research as a Guide for Curriculum Development: An Example for Introductory electricity. Part I : Investigation of Student Understanding. American Journal of Physics, 60, 994; doi: 10.1119/1.17003.

McLaren, B. M., and  Isotani, S. (2011) When Is It Best to Learn with All Worked Examples? In: G. Biswas et al. (Eds.) Proc. of the 15th AIED 2011, LNAI 6738, 222–229

Mohamed Ally & Josep Prieto- Blázquez. (2014). What is the Future of Mobile Learning in education ?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, Vol. 11 No. 1, 142-151. doi: 10.7238/rusc.v11i1.2033

Nievelstein, F., Gog, T.V., Dijck, G.V., et al. (2013). The worked example and expertise reversal effect in less structured tasks: Learning to reason about legal cases. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 118-125.

Paas, F.G.W.C, & Merrienboer Van, J.J.G. (1994). Variability of worked example and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skill : A cognitive-Load approach. Educational Psychology, 86, 122-133.

Renkl, A. (2014). Learning from worked example : how to prepare student from meaningful problem solving. Teks Book Applying Science of Learning in Education, 118.

Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., et al. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 90-108.

Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2010). Worked example effects in individual and group work settings. Educational Psychology, 30, 349-367.

Saifuddin Azwar. (2012). Penysunan Skala Psikologi (Edisi Kedua). Yogyakarta: PUSTAKA PELAJAR

Scaife, T.M., Heckler, A.F. (2013). The Dependence of Instructional Outcomes on Individual differences: An example from DC Circuits. AIP Conf. Proc. 1513, 370, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4789729.

Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In Andrews, R., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of E-Learning Research (pp. 221-247). London, UK: Sage publications.

Shipstone, D., & Cheng, P.C-H. (2001). Electric circuits: a New Approach Part 1. School Science Review, 83, 55-63.

Shipstone, D.M. (2007). A Study of Children’s Understanding of Electricity in Simple DC Circuits. European Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 185-198.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning, Cognitive Science, 12, 257-28

Sweller, J. (2006). The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 165–169

Timmermann, D., & Kautz, C. (2014). Investigating Students Learning of the Voltage and Potential Concepts in Introductory Electrical Egineering. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings. doi : 10.1109/fie.2014.7044048

Uden, L. (2007). Activity Theory for Designing Mobile Learning. International Journal of  Mobile Learning and Organization, 1(1), 81-102. doi: 10.1504/IJMLO.2007.011190

VanLehn, K. (1996). Cognitive Skill Acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 513-539.

Volk, J.H., Rashid, A.T., & Elder, L. (2010). Using Mobile to Improve Educational Outcomes; An Analysis of Evidence from Asia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol. 11 No. 1, 117-140.

Wali, E., Winters, N., & Oliver, M. (2008). Maintaining, changing and crossing contexts: An Activity theoretic reinterpretation of mobile learning. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 16(1), 41-57