(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 339-347 | DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2017.01231a | Article Number: ijese.2017.021
Published Online: May 08, 2017
Abstract
An expert in the field of science is often difficult to teach his knowledge to students. Conversely someone who is expert in the field of education is certainly more expert in transferring knowledge. The purpose of this research is to explore the skill of teaching skill preservice of physics teacher of High School. Samples were taken randomly as many as 50 people in two universities in Indonesia. The data collection used a Self-Regulated Leaning Based on Learning Style (SR2LS) questionnaire to detect their teaching skills through learning styles. The management of the learning class depends largely on the teacher's mastery of teaching materials. A good teaching strategy is needed in teaching abstract concepts to be more effective for students to understand. Students will experience misconception if the concept of teachers is not understood by students as in the lessons of the concept of atoms. Material physics is one of the lessons about the concept of atoms. The results showed that 60% of students had a "visual learning style", 30% "visual" and 10% "kinesthetic". Most preservice teachers can tailor their teaching strategies according to their own learning styles. But most of them have difficulty in analogizing the abstract concept on the atom.
Keywords: Self regulated learning, Learning style, Teaching skill
References
Aljaberi, N.M. (2015). University Students ’ Learning Styles and Their Ability to Solve Mathematical Problems. , 6(4), 152–165.
Bautista, R.G.(2012). The convergence of mastery learning approach and self-regulated learning strategy in teaching biology. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(10), 25–32.
Boyatzis, R.E. & Kolb, D.A. (1995). From learning styles to learning skills: the executive skills profile. Journal of managerial psychology, 10(5), 3–17.
Chatterjee, Srabasti., R.R. (2015). Linking Teaching Style and Learning Style As a Measure of Person, pp.37–49.
Dunn, R. (1983). Learning style and its relation to exceptionality at both ends of the spectrum. Exceptional children, 49(6), 496–506. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6861829.
Fayombo, G. (2015). Learning Styles, Teaching Strategies and Academic Achievement among some Psychology Undergraduates in Barbados. Caribbean Educational Research Journal The University of the West Indies, 3(2), 46–61. Available at: http://www.cavehill.uwi.edu/fhe/hum/publications/EducationCERJ.htm.
Felder, R. & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 57–72. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x/abstract.
Franzoni, a. L. & Assar, S. (2009). Student learning styles adaptation method based on teaching strategies and electronic media. Educational Technology & Society, 12, 15–29. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4561832.
Johnson, N. (2012). Examining Self Regulated Learning in Relation to Certains Elected Variables. , 5(3).
Kolb, A.Y. & Kolb, D. a. (2005). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory. LSI Technical Manual, pp.1–72.
Kolb, a. Y. & Kolb, D. a. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces : enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Management Learning, 4(2), 193–212. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40214287.
Landrum, T.J. & McDuffie, K.A. (2010). Learning Styles in the Age of Differentiated Instruction. Exceptionality, 18(1), 6–17. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09362830903462441.
Pintrich, P.R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1),.33–40.
Razeghi, M. (2009). Fundamentals of Solid State Engineering , 3 Edition,
Shea, P. & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers and Education, 55(4), 1721–1731. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017.
Xu, W. (2011). Learning Styles and Their Implications in Learning and Teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(4), 413–416.
Zimmerman, B.J. et al. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Academic Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339. Available at: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329.
Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner : An Overview. , 41(December 2012), 64–70.
Zimmerman, B.J. (1990). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.