This study aimed to investigate the effect of different Ages levels or age-related changes and explicit and implicit knowledge on mixed motor sequence learning and its consolidation. In this study, 96 right-handed boys who were healthy considering nervous system with age range of 6-18 years were selected via convenience sampling method. Serial reaction time task (SRTT) was used to evaluate and compare the performance in two components of response time and accuracy. The intervention was consisted of 10 stages (8 blocks for acquisition and 2 blocks for consolidation) in which the performances of groups were compared. The data were analyzed using mixed ANOVA test in 2 (type of learning) × 4 (age groups) × 8 (blocks) and Bonferroni test was used for paired comparisons. In acquisition phase for response time, significant main effects were observed for block (P = 0.031) and age (P = 0.001), not learning conditions (P = 0.431). For response accuracy, significant main effects were observed for block (P = 0.001), age (P = 0.001) and learning conditions (P = 0.003). In addition, the performances of groups across the two first blocks of practice on the second day were better compared with the first day in response time (P = 0.001) and accuracy (P = 0.001), which represented the consolidation of motor learning. The findings showed that among different age groups, there were age-related functional changes in the acquisition and consolidation of response time and accuracy for motor sequence task. Moreover, the various components of the movement (speed and accuracy) can be performed and consolidated in different ways. This matter should be considered in educational and rehabilitation interventions related to children and adolescents.

Alipour MA. (2009). Evaluate the reliability and validity of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory in Iran. Journal of Psychology Science, Vol. 6 -22.

Amanda S.Hodel, JulieC.Markant, SaraE.VanDenHeuvel. (2014). Developmental differences in effects of task pacing on implicit sequence learning. Frontiers in psychology, Vol. 25; 5: 153.

Barnea-Goraly N, Menon V, Eckert M, Tamm L, Bammer R. (2005). White matter development during childhood and adolescence: a cross-sectional diffusion tensor imaging study. Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 15:1848–1854.

Caroline L, Corinne C, Xavier S, Etienne Q. (2013). Age – related differences in perceptuomotor procedural learning in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 116:157-168.

Dima Amso, Juliet Davidow. (2010). The Development of implicit learning from infancy to Adulthood: Item Frequencies, Relations, and Cognitive Flexibility. Developmental psychobiology, Vol. 54,664-73.

Dorfberger Sh, Adi-Japha E, Karni A. (2007). Reduced susceptibility to interference in the consolidation of motor memory before adolescence. PLoS ONE, Vol. 2: 225-240.

Fischer S, Wilhelm I, Born J. (2007). Developmental differences in sleep's role for implicit offline learning: comparing children with adults. Journal Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 19:214–227.

Gallahue, D. L., & Ozmun, J. C. (2012). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults (7th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Garvey M, Ziemann U, Bartko J, Denckla M, Barker C. (2003). Cortical correlates of neuromotor development in healthy children. Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 114:1662–1670.

Hemminger C.SE, Shadmehr R. (2008). Consolidation Patterns of Human Motor Memory. Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 28(39): 9610 –9618.

Hikosaka O, Nakamura H, Sakai K, Nakahara H. (2002). Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Current Opinion Neurobiology, Vol. 12:217–222.

Janacsek. K, J. Fiser, and D. Nemeth. (2014).The Best Time to Acquire New Skills: Age-related Differences in Implicit Sequence Learning across Human Life Span. Developmental Science, Vol. 15(4): 496–505.

Nejati V, Ashayeri H, Garusi Farshi MT, Aghdasi MT. (2007). Dual task interference in implicit sequence learning by young and old adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2008, Vol. 23: 801-804.

Robertson E., Pascual -Leone A, Press D.Z. (2004). Awareness Modifies the Skill-Learning Benefits of Sleep. Current Biology, Vol. 14, 208-212.

Savion-Lemieux T, Jennifer A. Bailey, Penhune V. (2009) Developmental contributions to motor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, Vol.195:293–306.

Savion-Lemieux T, Penhune V. (2005). The effects of practice and delay on motor skill learning and retention. Experimental Brain Research, Vol.161:423–431.

Savion-Lemieux T, Penhune V. (2010). The effect of practice pattern on acquisition, consolidation, and transfer of visual - motor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 204:271–281.

Schmidt RA, Lee TD. (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (5th Ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Sekiya, H. and K. Fukuchi. (2004). Influence of rule complexity on implicit and explicit learning of a tracking task.  Sport and Exercise psychology, Vol. 26: 165-167.

Spencer RM, Gouw AM, Ivry RB. (2007). Age-related decline of sleep-dependent consolidation. Learning Memory, Vol. 14: 480–484.

Thomas K, Nelson C. (2001). Serial reaction time learning in preschool and school-age children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 79, 364–387.

Walker M P. (2005). A refined model of sleep and the time course of memory formation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 28:51-64.

Wilke M, Krageloh - Mann I, Holland S. (2007). Global and local development of gray and white matter volume in normal children and adolescents. . Experimental Brain Research, Vol.178:296–307.