Dynamics of International Economical Relationships in The Global Context of Innovative Modernization

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Ushakov, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Ushakov, D. (2016). Dynamics of International Economical Relationships in The Global Context of Innovative Modernization. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), 12937-12945.

Harvard
In-text: (Ushakov, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Ushakov, D. (2016). Dynamics of International Economical Relationships in The Global Context of Innovative Modernization. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), pp. 12937-12945.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Ushakov 2016)
Your Bibliography: Ushakov, Denis (2016). "Dynamics of International Economical Relationships in The Global Context of Innovative Modernization". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (18):12937-12945.

Abstract

Innovative modernization of economy provides abilities to rapidly change the internal and external economic interactions in the countries, to increase level of their own integration into global economic space; but also, generates a number of socio-economic problems associated primarily with asynchronous dynamics of innovation processes in the world. The paper based on the macroeconomic indicators analysis determines patterns of innovatization global dynamics, tests a hypothesis about countries’ positioning in the global modernization process, supposes forecasts on global high-tech and innovative products’ markets development, taking into account modern competition’s dynamics.

Keywords: Innovative modernization, high-tech markets, technology, innovative industries, innovative potential.

References

Atkinson, R. & Leigh, A. (2003). Customer-oriented e-government: Can we ever get there? In Gurtin, G., Sommer, M., (2003). The World of E-Government (pp. 80-98). Binghampton, NY: Haworth Press.

Dunleavy, P., Margetta, H., Bastow, S. & Tinkler, J. (2005). New Public Management is Dead – Long Live Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3).

Giddens, A. (2007). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

Howlett, M., Rayner, J. (2006). Globalization and Governance Capacity: Explaning Divergence in National Forest Programs as Instances of “Next-Generation” Regulation in Canada and Europe. Governance, 19(2).

Hutton, W. (2007). The Writing on the Wall: China and the West in the 21st Century. London: Little, Brown.

Ingraham, P. (2005). Performance: Promises to Keep and Miles to Go. Public Administration Review. 65(4).

Lundvall, В. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Printer Publishers.

Mann G. (2002). Global Electronic Commerce. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

Marchand D. (2009). How to keep up with the hyper competition. Mastering Information Management. February

Montri Chulavatnatol (2006). Iminovation TM. National Innovation Agency. Bangkok. Thailand.

Skufina T.P., Baranov S.V., Samarina V.P. (2016). Dependency between economic development of Russian regions and their level of informatization, 7(181).

Smart, B. (2009). Postmodernity. London, New York: Routledge.

The Global New E-Economy Index: A Cyber-Atlas (2012). 5th Edition.

Tiihonen, S. (2004). From Governing to Governance. A process of change. Tampere: Tampere University Press.

Tymoshenko O.V. (2016). Globalization impact on economic development of the state. Actual Problems of economics, 6(180).