(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 57-67 | Article Number: ijese.2016.918
Published Online: December 22, 2016
Abstract
The relevance of the studied problem in the paper stems from the fact that the study of the issue of co-operative links between science and industry is quite acute at the moment, because it is a weighty problem in overcoming the backlog of Russian level of technological development from the developed countries. The purpose of the paper is to systematize the prerequisites of the gap between the scientific and industrial sectors in the manufacturing sector of Russian economy and give recommendations of economic models, the implementation of which will minimize the institutional gaps. The leading method to the study of this problem is the method of systematization of factors indicating the existence of institutional gaps in the innovation sector of the Russian economy. The paper presents the Russian practice of interaction between science and industry, reveals the national peculiarities of integrative links between science and industry, based on the problems identified as the minimization of institutional gap offers a "triple helix" a model and formed on its basis the model of technological platform. Paper Submissions are of practical value for the government authorities in the development and implementation of federal and regional programs of innovative development, of innovative infrastructure’s development, stimulating of innovation, and the use of tools of technological platforms.
Keywords: Integrative cooperation, innovative development, triple helix, the institutional gap, "steering gear", institutional "traps".
References
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. New York: Routledge.
Freudenthal, G. & McLaughlin, P.. (2009). Classical Marxist Historiography of Science: the Hessen-Grossmann-Thesis. The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 278, 1–40.
Galimulina, F.F., Shinkevich, A.I., Komissarova, I.P., Mayorova, A.N., Astafyeva, I.A., Klimova, N.V., Nabiullina, K.R. & Zhukovskaya, I.V. (2016). Technology Platforms as an Efficient Tool to Modernize Russia’s Economy. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(1), 163-168.
Galimulina, F.F. (2015). Managing the development of technology platforms in innovative sectors of the Russian economy: PhD Thesis, Kazan.
Hochberg, L. (2003). National Innovation System of Russia in the conditions of the "new economy." Problems of Economics, 3, 12-21.
Indicators of innovation. (2016). Statistical publication. Moscow: Moscow National Research University "Higher School of Economics", 320 p.
Katukov, D.D., Malygin, V.E., & Smorodinskaya, N.V. (2012). The institutional environment of the globalized economy: the development of network communications. Moscow: Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012.
Khokhlov, N.G. (1990). The integrated system of training in higher education abroad. Moscow: Mysl.
Kudryavtseva, S.S. (2016). Modelling of innovative development in the theory of open innovation. Economic Bulletin of the Republic of Tatarstan, 1, 49-54.
Lubnina, A.A. (2015). Improving the management of innovative development of the petrochemical complex of the Republic of Tatarstan. Economic Bulletin of the Republic of Tatarstan, 4, 40-44.
MacGregor, S.P. & Carleton, T. (2012). Sustaining Innovation. Collaboration Models for a Complex World. New York: Springer.
On measures of state support of development of cooperation of Russian higher education institutions and organizations implementing integrated projects for high-tech production. (2010). The site of the Russian newspaper. Direct access: http://www.rg.ru/2010/04/16/pravila-dok.html.
On the state of the business climate in Russia in 2015. (2015). Direct access: http://media.rspp.ru/document/1/4/9/49a7e7582a6770fb770f8ea535b63a6c.pdf.
Rudnik, P.B. (2011). Technology Platforms in the practice of the Russian innovation policy. Forsyth, 1, 16-25.
Russia by the Numbers. (2016). Krat.stat.sb. Moscow: Rosstat.
Saritas, O. (2013). Systemic Foresight Methodology, in: Science, Technology and Innovation Policy for the Future. Heidelberg: Springer.
Science. Innovation. Information Society. (2015). Science. Innovation. Information Society. Moscow: National Research University "Higher School of Economics".
Shinkevich, M.V. (2011). The institutionalization of sustainable innovation development of mezzo-sistems: models and management technologies. Kazan: Kazan. nat. resear. tehnol. University.
Sukhovey, A. (2009). Formation and actualization of the prerequisites of innovation development of the region. Direct access: http://rusk.ru/st.php?idar=114529, free.
The Global Competitiveness Report 2015–2016. Direct access: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/gcr/2015-2016/Global_Competitiveness_Report_2015-2016.pdf.