(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 15-24 | Article Number: ijese.2016.914
Published Online: December 21, 2016
Abstract
The urgency of the problem under investigation is reasoned by insufficient study of problems of offenses prevention, the causes of crime in different historical epochs. In this regard, this paper aims to identify the features of the genesis and evolution of the largest areas of criminological concepts: from moral and religious, social and biological beliefs to the level of political positions. The leading methods to the study of this problem is the historical method, which allowed to reveal the historical stages of development of criminological sciences, as well as the modeling method which allowed to consider the problem solving of crime prevention as a purposeful and organized process for improving the professional and general cultural and development of special competencies of criminologists experts needed them to deal effectively with the major causes of crime in modern society. The main results of the paper are: the rationale for considering criminology itself as extremely complex science, engaged in a comprehensive study of the nature of crime, as well as all other phenomena and processes that can facilitate or hinder their fulfillment; justification of criminology as an independent subsystem of the criminal law policy of the modern state. On the basis of research the authors conclude that there is no possibility of domination in the modern society of any one of the main directions in the study of the causes of crime and the need to consider the most criminology as extremely complex science dealing with comprehensive study of the nature of the crime and as well as all other phenomena and processes that can facilitate or hinder their fulfillment. Considering criminology as an important component of the fight against crime, the government has always faced with the problem of self-identification of criminology as a science or as a form of human activity, either as a State policy. This is evidenced a historical analysis of the main stages in the development of criminological views conducted by the authors. Paper Submissions may be useful for further study of issues of crime prevention, the causes of crime, as well as for scientific study of problem of self-identification of criminology as a science or as a form of human activity, either as a State policy.
Keywords: Offense, crime, criminology, criminological policy
References
Antonyan, Y.M. (2015). What is Criminology. Scientific Portal Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2, 33-38.
Babayev, M.M. (2008). About criminological component of criminal policy. Criminological magazine, 2, 5-6.
Babayev, V.K. (1993). General Theory of Law. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod University.
Batyr, K.I. & Polikarpova, E.V. (1996). Readings on the General History of State and Law. Moscow: Jurist.
Beccaria, C. (2004). On Crimes and Punishments. Composition. and foreword of V.S. Ovchinsky. Moscow: INFRA-M.
Bogomolov, S.A. (2004). History of political and legal doctrines. Moscow: Publishing House "Dashkov and K".
Delay, J. & Deniker, P. (1961). Métodes chimiothérapiques en psychiatrie. Paris: Masson et Cie.
Diogenes Laertius. (1979). On the life, teachings and sayings of famous philosophers. Moscow: Mysl.
Dolgova, A.I. (1997). Criminology. Moscow: Jurist.
Dubinin, N.P., Karpets, I.I. & Kudryavtsev, V.N. (1982). Genetics. Behavior. Responsibility. Moscow: Politizdat.
Èminov, V.I. (2009). The history of science Criminology. Lex Russica, 1, 74-75.
Ferry, E. (1908). Criminal sociology. Moscow: Publishing house of V.M. Sablin.
Foinitsky, I.J. (2000). The doctrine of punishment in connection with prison study. Moscow, publishing house "Gorodets, Dobrosvet-2000".
Gilinskiy, J.I. (2012). Some trends in the world of criminology . Russian Yearbook of Criminal Law, 6, 8-31.
Gresham, M. (1974). Rise of Critical Criminology . Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 2, 205-213.
Grudtsyna, L.Y. (2016). Comparative-legal characteristic of the structure and functions of the judicial systems of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Russian Federation. Education and Law, 4, 115-116.
Gurinskaya, A.L. (2010). Positivist tradition and a critical direction of criminological thought of the US and the UK: a comparison of theoretical approaches. Proceedings of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen, 134, 101-114
Inshakov, S.M. (1997). International criminology. Moscow: Publishing group of INFRA-M.
Ivanov, A. (2015). Russian legal science abroad XIX-XX centuries and the formation of the personal approach to punishment. Direct access: http:.www.lawmix.ru/comm/1043/.
Ivanov, A.A. (2009). From talion to the individualization of legal liability. Historical Sketch of development of legal principle. Moscow: UNITY-DANA.
Ivanov, A.A. & Ivanov, V.P. (2006). Offence and legal responsibility. The theory and legislative practice. Moscow: UNITY-DANA.
Kleimenov, I.M. (2011). Criminology in UK and USA . Bulletin of Omsk University. "Right" series, 4, 147-152.
Kudryavtsev, V.N. (1998). The genesis of crime. Experience of criminological modeling. Moscow: Infra-M Publishing House "Forum".
Lagutkin, A.V. & Grudtsyna, L. Y, (2016). Constitution as an archaic legal instrument. State and right, 7, 103-104.
Leist, O.E. (2000). History of political and legal doctrines. Moscow: Gorodets.
Lublinsky, P.I. (1914). On the action of punishment. New ideas in jurisprudence, 5, 10-11.
Markuntsov, S.A. (2011). On the concept and subject of the criminal law sociology. Bulletin of the Buryat State University, 2, 260-261.
Marx, K. (1955). The debate over the law on forests theft. Moscow: State Publishing House political literature.
Nazarenko, G.V. (2001). Criminal relevant states of persons who commited crime and socially dangerous acts. Moscow: Os-89.
Nersesyants, V.S. (2000). History of political and legal doctrines. Moscow: NORMA-INFRA-M.
Paz, O. (1979). Reflections: Mexico and United States. The New Yorker, 17 September. Direct access: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1979/09/17/mexico-and-the-united-states
Poletti, F. (1878). Le piu recenti scoperte ed applicazioni della psichiatria ed antropologia criminale. Roma: Fratelli Bocca, 34-35.
Poznyshev, S.V. (1904). Basic questions about the punishment exercises. Moscow: Universal Printing House.
Queteler, A.J. (1835). Sur L Ohomme et development de ses focultes, ou de physique sociale. Bruxelles: La Renaissance du Livre.
Radishchev, A.N. (1952). Selected philosophical and socio-political works. Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature.
Shagieva, R.V. (1989). Prevention of crime. Kazan: Publishing House of Kazan University, 45-46.
Stankevich, V.B. (1914). The fight against a dangerous condition as the main task of the new Criminal Law. New ideas in jurisprudence. St. Petersburg: Publishing house "Education".
Vladimirov, L.E. (1908). Course of Criminal Law. Moscow, 176-177.
Zernov, D.T. (1906). Critical analysis of the anatomical bases of criminal theory of Lombroso's. Moscow: University Printing House.