(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 12431-12447 | Article Number: ijese.2016.910
Published Online: December 15, 2016
Abstract
The article revels the management issues of the modern stage of the government programs implementation in Russia using the example of the Russian Federation Government Program “Development of Science and Technology” for the period of 2013-2020 and also suggests their solutions. Transition from the ROR method to the Results-based budgeting at the RF budgeting by accepting long-term government programs causes the necessity of improving the methods for estimating their implementation. The article also considers the methods for efficiency estimate of the government programs applied in the USA (PART system). These methods are tested at estimate of the regional target program in the Ulyanovsk Region with the purpose of comparative analysis of the obtained results. Having investigated the reasons of non-correspondence of the Russian specialists’ estimate and the results of the conducted calculation and detecting the disadvantages of the current Russian methods, the authors have developed a suggestion to integrate the main criteria of the PART system into the Russian practice. They also revealed that despite such a positive role of targeted programs in the life of a state, their implementation in the RF practice is far from ideal, because both the regulatory base and the practice of its implementation require significant corrections. Imperfection of the Russian practice of targeted program approach to the government regulation is manifested in numerous repetitions of the events and measures in terms of various programs (projects) of the executive authorities, chronic lack of financing, long-standing time lag of their implementation, inefficient system of control over the achievement of the goals and the estimate of the justification of the budget costs. It is defined that considering the issue of development, implementation and estimate of efficiency of the targeted programs through the example of our country and moreover comparing it with the other countries it is notable that Russia have been implementing state policy in the conditions of market relations for just 20 years (considering the nonmarketable practice of state programming this period is certainly longer). The ways of the situation improvement are revealed and the planning trend lines on general increase in the government control efficiency are built up.
Keywords: State program of the Russian Federation, management quality, coordination, mechanism of cooperation, assignment of responsibilities, monitoring
References
Budget Code of the Russian Federation No. 145-FZ. (1998). Direct access: http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/pe/BudgetLaws/Budget_Code_Russia_Eng1998.pdf
Chaffin, M., Bard, D., Bigfoot, D.S. & Maher, E.J. (2012). Is a structured, manualized, evidence-based treatment protocol culturally competent and equivalently effective among American Indian parents in child welfare? Child Maltreatment, 17, 242-252.
Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2009). Early childhood home visitation program models: An objective summary of the evidence about which are effective. Washington: Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy.
Consultative bodies. (2007). List of coordination and advisory bodies, formed by the Russian Federation Ministry of Education and Science. Direct access: http://minobrnauki.rf/ministry/.
Daro, D. (2006). Home-visitation: Assessing progress, managing expectations. Chicago: Ounce of Prevention Fund and Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
Decree of the Russian Federation Government No. 1101-r. (2010). On Authorization of the Program of the RF Government on Improving the Efficiency of the Budget Costs up to 2012. Moscow.
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2433. (2012). On Governmental Program of the Russian Federation ‘Development of Science and Technologies’. Moscow.
Decree of the Russian Federation Government No. 2593-r. (2013). On Authorization of the Program of Improving the Efficiency of the Pubic (State and Municipal). Finances for the period up to 2018. Moscow.
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 260. (2004). On Procedural Rules of the RF Government and Provision of the Central Office of the Government of the Russian Federation. Moscow.
Decree of the RF Government No. 301. (2014). On Authorization of the Government Program of the Russian Federation ‘Development of Science and Technology’ for the period of 2013 – 2020. Moscow.
Decree of the Russian Federation Government No. 588. (2010). On Approval of the Procedure of Development, Implementation and Estimate of the Efficiency of the Government Programs of the Russian Federation. Moscow.
Decree of the RF Government No. 594. (2005). On Implementation of the Federal Law ‘On Products Supplies for the Federal Needs’. Moscow.
Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 599. (2012). On Measures on Implementation of the Government Policy in the Sphere of Education and Science. Moscow.
Design Options for Home Visiting Evaluation. (2012). Overview of observational measurement instruments available for home visiting. Design Options for Home Visiting Evaluation: Home visit observation brief. Washington,: Design Options for Home Visiting Evaluation. Direct access: http://www.mdrc.org/.
Dmitrishina, E.V. & Uskov, D.A. (2015). The Issues of Covering Science and Technical Policy of Modern Russia in the Strategic Planning Documents. European Research Studies, 18, 57-74.
Dunst, C.J. & Trivette, C.M. (2009). Let’s be PALS: An evidence-based approach to professional development. Infants & Young Children, 22, 164-176.
Durlak, J.A. & DuPre, E.P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327-350.
Federal Law No. 172-FZ. (2014). On Strategy Planning in the Russian Federation. Direct access: http://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=68617
Fixsen, D.L. (2014). Scaling an effective intervention: How to build implementation capacity, replicate with fidelity, and produce consistent outcomes. Baltimore: Social Solutions.
Fixsen, D.L., Naoom, S.F., Blasé, K.A., Frideman, R.M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication #231). Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute.
Hanft, B.E., Rush, D.D. & Shelden, M.L. (2004). Coaching families and colleagues in early childhood. Baltimore: Brookes.
Knjazev, S.N. (2002). Management: Art, Science and Practice: Study Guide. Minsk: Armita-Marketing.
Orders of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation No. 582. (2016). On Approval of the Methodic Guidelines on Development and Implementation of the Government Programs of the Russian Federation. Moscow.
The development of science and technology as a tool for the formation of basic knowledge. (2014). The project: Formation of proposals for the revision of the State program of the Russian Federation (the unique identifier of the agreement - № RFMEFI60314X0001). Moscow.
The development of science and technology for 2013-2020. (2012). The project: Methodological support and development of proposals on improvement of the Russian Federation, the state program management mechanism (the unique identifier of the agreement - RFMEFI60314X0004). Moscow.