(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 12167-12182 | Article Number: ijese.2016.888
Published Online: December 06, 2016
Abstract
The relevance of the investigated problem is conditioned by absence of the single approach to the common criteria and mechanisms of a pedagogical educational establishment’s assessment; the current assessment principles of planning and management are out-of-date. The aim of this article is to analyze theoretical approaches and concepts of management efficiency; to develop an assessment model to identify management efficiency of an educational establishment of pedagogical profile of higher education on the basis of the distinguished parameters, factors and criteria. This model was implemented in 6 universities of Russia and involved the participation of 212 teachers and 680 students. The main methods of our research are: theoretical analysis of scientific literature in area of philosophy, psychology, pedagogics and management to determine the concept “Management of a pedagogical institution of higher education”; designing a factor-criterion model, which would allow to consider this problem as a complex concept and assess the management efficiency of an educational establishment of pedagogical profile of higher education. The concepts (target, system, balance of interests, functional, compositional) and approaches (integral, level, time) of management efficiency assessment are analyzed in the article. Two groups of parameters of management efficiency of a higher educational establishment are distinguished. The first group includes parameters that characterize activity of an institution of higher education: economic efficiency, social efficiency, quality of education. In the second group, parameters that characterize management are included: orientation on innovations, human resources policy, and management system. These parameters embrace all aspects of an educational establishment activity and were chosen as the basis of factor-criterion model of management efficiency assessment of an educational establishment of pedagogical profile of higher education. Selected parameters in this model are specified by factors and criteria. The materials of the article present a practical value not only for educational establishments of pedagogical profile but also for the whole system of higher professional education. The presented factor-criterion model is a tool for assessing management efficiency of different educational establishments.
Keywords: Management, factor-criterion model, management efficiency assessment, parameters of management efficiency of an institution of higher education
References
Asau, A.N. & Karupov, B.M. (2007). Management of the higher education institution in the innovation economy. St. Petersburg: Gumanistika.
Bukina, V.M. (2006). Technology system: the reference summary. Kyiv: Kyiv National Polytechnic University.
Can, E. (2016). Open and distance education accreditation standards scale: validity and reliability studies. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 6344-6356.
Danilenko, L.I. (2007). Management of innovation in education. Kiev: School Peace.
Elnikova, G.V. (2004). Fundamentals of Adaptive Control. Kharkov: Publishing Group "Basis".
Gabdrakhmanova, R.G. & Guseva, T.S. (2016). Conditions of Social-Pedagogical Maintenance of Bilingual Children in Educational Institutions. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 6373-6380.
Garifullin, N.Y. (2011). Financial support dyatel'nosti budgetary educational institution providing educational services. Economics of Education, 1, 5-17.
Gorobets, D.V. (2014). Theoretical bases of management of development of technology of pedagogical college. Yalta: The problems of modern teacher education, 42, 24-31.
Ibragimov, I.D., Dusenko, S.V., Khairullina, E.R., Tikhonova, N.V. & Yevgrafova, O.G. (2016). Recommendations on the Textbooks Creation as Information and Teaching Tools of Education Management. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(3), 433-446.
Kamalova, L.A. & Raykova, E. (2016). The Quality and Criteria of Evaluation of Educational Work at the Universities of Russia at the Contemporary Stage. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 71-79.
Kanapinov, C.B. (2012). Formation of innovative strategy of the university and the evaluation of its effectiveness. Novosibirsk, Siberian Academy of Finance and Banking.
Kashina, S.G., Chudnovskiy, A.D., Aleksandrova, N.S., Shamov, I.V. & Borovaya, M.A. (2016). Management of Students’ Vocational Training in Conditions of Social Partnership between the University and Industry. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(3), 447-456.
Kashuk, L.I. (2007). Quality assurance system of higher education: evaluation and management mechanisms (on the Republic of Kazakhstan). Pavlodar: Pavlodar Innovative University of Eurasia.
Kondruh, M.B. (2003). Organizational-pedagogical conditions of the effective management of the development of professional-pedagogical college. Magnitogorsk: Magnitogorsk State University.
Konoplina, N.V. (2000). System-targeted management development of pedagogical high school. Surgut: Surgut State Pedagogical Institute.
Lobashev, V.D. (2005). Educational qualimetry learning outcomes. Standards and Monitoring in Education, 1, 21 - 25.
Lysikova, O.B. (2004). Management of development of the higher education institution (the example of the Modern Humanitarian Academy): Moscow: Modern Humanitarian Academy.
Marmaza, A.I. (2010). Quality control: signs forming agent. School of Management, 19, 42-47.
Masalimova, A.R., Schepkina, N.K., Leifa, A.V., Shaidullina, A.R., Burdukovskaya, E.A. (2014). Mentoring perfection in modern enterprises conditions: practical recommendations. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(7), 1152-1156.
Mazur, I.I. (2003). Effective management. Moscow: High School.
Nazarenko, L.N. (2016). Factors development management educational institution. Theory and methods of educational management, 1(17), 1-14.
Ostapenko, T.I. (2011). Reflexive control the development of innovative educational institution: educational and professional resource center. Chelyabinsk: Ural State University of Physical Education.
Rivchun, T.E. (2010). Conceptual bases of increase of efficiency of activity of the higher education institution. Moscow: Russian State University of Tourism and Service.
Shaidullina, A.R., Pavlova, N.A., Minsabirova, V.N., Burdukovskaya, E.A., Yunusova, A.B., Letyaev, V.A., Afanasev, A.S. (2015). Integration Processes in Education: Classification of Integration Types. Review of European Studies, 7(4), 27-31.
Sidorov, V.V. & Vorobyova, N.P. (2005). Multi-level governance model of educational activities of the university. Proceedings of the XII Scientific and Technical Conference"Telematica-2005". St. Petersburg, 236-238
Tsehmistrova, G.S. & Fomenko, N.A. (2005). Management in education and pedagogical diagnostics. Kiev: Publishing House "Word".
Zhuravlev, V.P., Kartashov, S.A., Mousov, N.K. & Odegov, U.G. (2004). Human Resources Management Technology. Moscow: "Exam" Publishing House.