In the article the questions of the organization of the specially protected natural reservationspecially protected natural reservations in the city and suburbs are considered. Tendencies in identification and creation of city SPNR are analyzed. On the example of Lipetsk the creation problems of local SPNR, typical for Russia, are revealed. In the city governance there was no idea that the created SPNR system had to be included in common regional structure of SPNR, had to be built considering the city development and, finally, to enter in the ecological framework of the city. The significant problem of SPNR creation is an administrative accessory of the land plots within the city and in close proximity to it. The unwillingness of the city authorities to consider large territories as potential local SPNR led them to the idea of creation of chain of especially protected natural objects (separate trees).  In most cases, park territories which by definition are created for the organization of population recreational activity have the SPNR status in the cities.  Therefore there is a need of combination of nature protection and recreational functions in these territories. SPNR make a basis for structure of the city ecological framework which needs to be divided into internal and external elements (internal and external ecological framework). External elements should be aimed to preservation of biological and landscape diversity and to be the buffer for closely guarded territories (nature reserves). The external ecological framework of the city has to cover the territory of the city and its suburbs. Internal elements should be aimed to preservation of the quasi natural environment in the city and to be the ecological corridors, making the city landscape ecologically transparent.

Adams, C. E., et al. (2006). Urban wildlife management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC. 331p.

Aune, K., et al. (2011). Assessment and planning for ecological connectivity: A practical guide. Direct access: http://www.wcs-ahead.org/kaza/ecological_connectivity_07_20_11_2.pdf.

Bobrov, V. V. (2014).The analysis of a representativeness chain of the projectible specially protected natural reservation of Moscow for preserving rare and endangered species of vertebrate animals (Vertebrata). Moscow State Humanitarian University Bulletin,1(2),55-69.

Buzmakov, S.A. & Sannikov P. Yu. (2012). The prospects of chain creation of specially protected natural reservation of Perm city. Bulletin Udmurtskogo State University, 6 (3), 14-22.

Cook, E. A. (2002). Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58, 269–280

Gridnev D. Z., Volynskaya A.A. (2010). Functioning of the natural territories in the city and the modes of their use. Science and the present. 5(1), 49-53.

Li, H., Chen, W. & He W. (2015). Planning of Green Space Ecological Network in Urban Areas:An Example of Nanchang, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12,12889-12904

Hess, G.R. & Fischer R. A. (2001). Communicating clearly about conservation corridors. Landscape and Urban Planning, 55,195-208

Knapp S., Kühn I., Mosbrugger V. & Klotz S. (2008). Do protected areas in urban and rural landscapes differ in species diversity? Biodiversity and Conservation, 17,1595-1612

Kochurov B. I., Gridnev D. Z. & Kurbatova A. S. (2010). The Natural and ecological framework in territorial planning of municipalities. Problems of regional ecology. 6, 186-194.

Ovdiyenko N. I. (2009). Ecological framework of the Stavropol city. Modern high technologies. Direct access: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekologicheskiy-karkas-goroda-stavropolya

Rodoman B. B. (2002). The polarized biosphere. Smolensk,  336 p.

Sannikov  P. Yu. (2014). Overview of evaluation methods of a representativeness of SPNR chains. Geographical messenger, 2 (29), 107-115.

Trzyna T., et al. 2014. Urban Protected Areas: Profiles and best practice guidelines. Direct access: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/PAG-022.pdf