The relevance of the study is conditioned by a radical impact on the learning process of the university by information technology, which put start a new phase in its transformation.  According to experts at the present time the main factor of efficiency of university’s activity becomes the expansion of students’ learning activities, realized on the basis of new technologies in educational environments which they create with the changed learning functions. In the prevailing socio - pedagogical conditions the earlier  priority educational - cognitive function fades into the background, giving way to a constructively – projective one, performing the role of not only the means of instruction and formation of students' creative work competences, but also of didactic conditions for extrapolation of changed functions of training in information technology. In this regard, the focus in this article is devoted to the establishment of the theoretical - methodical approach to projecting of the structure and content of constructively- projective function of students’ learning as a didactic direction of educational process’s transformations in university, extrapolated for the implementation of information technologies. The leading method of research is the pedagogical modeling, allowing justifying of theoretical and practical effectiveness of the structure and content of constructively- projective learning function of student, extrapolated in the implementation of information technology in the educational process. The article presents the discourse of the concept “constructive - projective function of students' learning”; based on the results of the study the didactic structure and content of constructive-projective function of students’ learning is justified, which is extrapolated on the target, content, procedure and evaluation components of the modified functions of information technology; practice - oriented approaches of extrapolation of constructively - orienting function on the model of a specialist is established;  the effectiveness of the identified structure and content of the functions using the quality criteria of information technologies is proved: conceptuality, integrity diagnostic ability, predictability, controllability, efficiency, reproducibility, creativity are proved. Presented in the paper results of the study can be useful for the practice of teachers, managers, trainers, facilitators of universities.

Artigue, M. & Perrin-Glorian, M. (1991). Didactic engineering, research and development tool: Some theoretical problems linked to this duality. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11, 13-17.

Artigue, M. (1992). Didactic engineering. Recherches en Didactique des Mathematiques. Special book ICME. V11.

Bespal’ko, O.B. (1995). Education and advanced training technologies. Moscow: Pedagogy.

Bloom, V. (2000). Taxonomy. St.Petersburg: Peter.

Choshanov, M.A. (2013). Evolution of views on didactics: whether the time has come for a new didactics? Didactics of vocational school. Collection of scientific papers. Kazan: Publishing house "Danis".

D`Angelo, G. (2007). From Didactics to e – Didactics: e – learning Paradigms  Models and Techniques. Napoli: Liguori.

Dewey, J. (1997). Psychology and Pedagogy of thinking. Moscow: Sovershenstvo.208.

Douady, R. (1997) Didactic engineering. In T. Nunes, and P. Bryant (Eds). Learning and Teaching Mathematics: An International Perspective. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd.

Erdniyev, P.M. (1992). Consolidation of didactic units as a learning technology. Moscow: Prosvescheniye.

Isaev, I.F. (2001). US University Teacher: Professional - pedagogical training. Belgorod: Publishing house of BSU.

Kalimullin, A.M. & Islamova, Z.I. (2016). Formation of Information-Educational Environment in the Partner Universities of University of Shanghai Cooperation Organization. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1879-1890.

Khutorskoy, A.V. (2001). Modern didactics. St.Petersburg: Peter.

Klarin, M.V. (2002). Learning Technologies: the ideal and the reality. Moscow: Nauka.

Kuzmina, N.V. (1979). Skills, gift, talent of a teacher. Leningrad: Publishing house "Znaniye".

Leont’ev, A.N. (1977). Activity, consciousness, personality. Moscow: Politizdat.

Logvinov, I.I. (2005). Basics of didactics. Moscow: MPSI.

Mitra, S. (2005). Self organizing systems for mass computer literacy: Findings from the «hole in the vall»  experiments. International Journal for Development Issues, 4(1), 71 – 81.

Novikov, A.M. (2006). Education Methodology. Moscow: "Egves".

Polat, E.S. (2000). Internet in Humanities. Moscow: Vlados.

Ruthven, K. (2002). Linking researching with teaching: Towards synergy of scholarly and craft knowledge. London: LEA.

Slastenin, V.A. & Podymova L.S. (1997). Education: Innovation activities. Moscow: NPC "Master".

Talyzina, N.F. (1975). Control of learning process. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow University.

Yakimanskaya, I.S. (2000). Technology of personality - oriented education. Moscow: September.

Yepisheva, O.B. (2003). Mathematics learning technology based on activity approach. Moscow: Prosvescheniye.

Zagvyazinsky, V.I. (2001). Training theory: A modern interpretation. Moscow: Academy.

Zizek, S. (1996). From virtual reality to the virtualization of reality. New York: Aperture.