(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 11957-11967 | Article Number: ijese.2016.870
Published Online: December 02, 2016
Abstract
It is shown that in the last decades, geography has expanded so much, that it has lost its object of study. It was not clear, what the geographical science does, and, as a consequence, households have an extremely low level of geographical cultures and geographical education. Each geography is extremely isolated, has its own object of study. Especially the big gap still lies between the physical and socio-economic geography. As a result, each geographical science was so moving away from geography that actually merges with the adjacent sciences – physics, geology, economics, sociology, biology, political science etc.
To solve this problem proposed to define the human environment as the object of geography study. The environment was defined as an area where natural sphere (geographical envelope), anthropogenic (man-made) sphere and the social sphere interact with each other. At the same time narrow scientific branches, not in charge of environment, should move to the appropriate related sciences, is now actually happening. Thus, we propose a new geographical paradigm, where the geography will become less scattered, and will take single or synergistic nature.
Keywords: environment; the study object of geography; scattered geography natural sphere; anthropogenic sphere; social sphere; single geography; synergetic geography
References
Anuchin, V. A. (1972). Theoretical foundations of geography. Moscow: Mysl, 360.
Baranskiy, N. N. (1980). Selected works. Scientific principles of geography. Moscow: Mysl.239.
Gerasimov, I. P. (1976). Soviet constructive geography: objectives, approaches, results. Moscow: Nauka, 208.
Gladkiy, Y. N. (2016). Humanitarian geography as scientific knowledge. Moscow-Berlin. 544.
Golubchik, M. M., Evdokimov, S. P., Maksimov, G. N., & Nosonov, A. M. (2005). Theory and methodology of geographical science. Moscow: Humanitarian publishing center “VLADOS”, 463.
Gorbanov, V. A. (2015). New – old geography. Current issues and trends in modern science. Proceedings of II International research and practical conference. Makhachkala, 6-21.
Gorbanyov, V. A. (2014) Social geography of foreign world and Russia. Moscow: Yuniti-Dana, 487.
Granberg, A. G. (2009). About the program of fundamental research of spatial development in Russia. Region, Volume 2, 166-178.
Gumilev, L. N. (1967). On the "single" geography: (landscape and ethnos). Leningrad University bulletin, 6(1), 120-129.
Grigoriev A. A. (1937) Experience analytical characteristics of the composition and structure of physical and geographical envelope of the globe. Leningrad-Moscow.
Gumilyov L. N. (1967). On the " single " geography: (landscape and ethnos). Leningrad University bulletin, Issue 6(1), 120-129.
Haggett P., Chorley R.J., (2013). Models, Paradigms and the New Geography// Integrated Models in Geography, Routledge. 19-39.
Haggett P. (1975) Geography: A Modern Synthesis. New-York-London: Harpen International Edition. 671-674.
Harvey D. (1969) Explanation in Geography. London: Edward Arnold. 521.
Hettner A. Die (1927). Geographie, Ihre Geschichte, ihr Wesen und ihre Methoden. Breslau: Hirt
Isachenko, A. G. (2004). Theory and methodology of geographical science. Moscow: Akademia, 396.
Kalesnik, S. V. (1970). On the significance of Lenin's ideas for Soviet geography. Leningrad: USSR geographical society, 14.
Kotlyakov, V. M. (2012). Geography as a critical science of the environment. Ecology and life, 1, 36-42.
Maksakovskiy, V. P. (1998). Geographical culture. Moscow: Vlados, 415.
Minakir, P. A., Demianenko, A. N., & Piliasov, A. N. (2013). The conceptual framework of the spatial approach. Fundamental problems of spatial development of the Russian Federation: interdisciplinary synthesis. Moscow: Media-Press. 31-43.
Mukitanov, N. K. (1985). From Strabo to the present day. Moscow: Mysl, 237.
Preobrazhensky, V. S. (2001). I am a geographer. Moscow: GEOS, 291.
Reymers, N. F. (1992). Hope for the mankind survival. Conceptual ecology. Moscow: Rossiya molodaya, 368.
Saushkin, Y. G. (2001). Selected works. Smolensk: Universum, 416.
Seliverstov, Y. P. (2000). Modern geography – environmental science. Proceedings of XI Russian Geographical society congress - Thesis. St. Petersburg State University, I, 3-24
Slater D. (1974) Contribution to a Critique of Development Geography. Canadian J. of African Studies, 8. 325-354.
Trofimov, A. M., & Sharygin, M. D. (2007). General geography. Issues of theory and methodology. Perm, 494.
World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. The World Bank, Washington. 385.