(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 11931-11941 | Article Number: ijese.2016.869
Published Online: November 28, 2016
Abstract
The article deals with the actual problems of the coordination activity of Ukrainian prosecution agencies in the fight against crime, which require urgent solution. They include insufficient legal support of the coordination activity of prosecution agencies; inadequate level of methodological developments regarding these issues; implementation by prosecutors of only a few directions and forms of the coordination activity; inadequate organization of the coordination activity; absence of effective criteria to assess its effectiveness. At the same time, the coordination activity of prosecution agencies is regarded as a component of criminological function of prosecution agencies.
Attention is drawn to the fact that criminological function, which is not directly enshrined in the legislation of Ukraine but is immanent to all activities of prosecution agencies that include maintenance of public prosecution, representation, supervision over compliance with laws by the agencies of inquiry and pre-trial investigation, supervision over the implementation of laws in the execution of judicial decisions in criminal matters, and coordination.
Keywords: Criminological function, crime, coordination activity
References
Alyona N. Klochko, Nikolay I. Logvinenko, Tatyana А. Kobzeva, Elena I. Kiselyova (2016). Legalizing proceeds from crime through the banking system. . Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law. 2016. vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 195 p
Conway G. (2013). Holding to Account a Possible European Public Prosecutor Supranational Governance and Accountability across Diverse Legal Traditions. Criminal Law Forum, 3(24): 371-401.
Golina V.V. (1981). The work of the bodies of internal affairs, court and prosecutor’s office on crime prevention. V.V. Golina. Jurid. in-t, p. 77.
Gudkov, L. (2013). Fatal continuities: From soviet totalitarianism to Putin’s authoritarianism. Osteuropa, 5 1 -6(63): 283-295.
Ivanov A.V. (2013). Century Criminological function of the bodies of the Prosecutor's office for the prevention of tax crimes. The fight against crime: Collection of research materials: V.I. Borisov et al. Pravo, Issue 25, 304 p.
Kononov A.L. (1993). History of supervision over observance of rights and legimate interests of citizens. A.L. Kononov. M.: NII problem ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka, pp. 42-52. (Sovetskaya prokuratura. Ocherki istorii).
Kozachuk O. (2014). The content and organization coordinating the activities of the bodies of the Prosecutor’s office for supervision over observance of law in the military sphere. O. Kozachuk. Vestnik prokuratury. No. 3, pp. 84-89.
Kornjakova T.V. (2004). The prosecutor’s office and agencies nondepartmental control: Dis. thesis for the degree of the Candidate of Juridical Sciences: 12.00.10, Odessa, 216 p.
Kosyuta M.V. (2002). Problems and ways of the development of the Prosecutor’s office of Ukraine in the conditions of building a democratic state: Thesis for the degree of the Doctor of Juridical Sciences: 12.00.10, Odesa, 467 p.
Kulish A.N., Klochko A.N. (2013). Some aspects of criminological security of financial institutions. Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law. 2013. № 4, 129 p.
Lagovier N. (1929) Task and role of the Prosecutor as the organizer of the crime. N. Lagovier. Ezhenedelnik sovetskoy yustitsii. No.47. pp. 112-115.
Manuel K.M., Garvey T. (2013). Prosecutorial discretion in immigration enforcement: Legal issues. Immigration Enforcement: Elements and Legal Issues. CRS, United States. 28р.
Miroshnichenko S.S. (2008). The activities of the Prosecutor's office on the prevention of organized crime. K. 212 p.
Modern problems and strategy of the fight against crime. Ed. By V.N. Burlakov, B. V. Volzhenkin. St. Petersburg, 2005, 592 p.
Monar J. (2013). Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor Perspective: From Cooperation to Integration in EU Criminal Justice? Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 3(14): 339-356.
On measures for further improvement of activity of bodies of Prosecutor’s office for combating crime and violations of the law. Sbornik deystvuyushchikh prikazov i instruktsiy Generalnogo prokurora SSSR. M., 1966. Ch.1.
Rott V. A. (1924). The interaction of the worker-peasant inspection and judicial bodies. Vestnik sovetskoj justicii (Ukraina). No.12. pp. 339-340.
Temporary regulation of the people’s Commissariat of justice of the RSFSR. Ezhenedelnik sovetskoy yustitsii. 1922. No. 28.
Vervaele J.A.E. (2014). The material scope of competence of the European Public Prosecutor's Office: Lex uncerta and unpraevia? ERA Forum, 1: 85-99.
Yakimchuk M.K. (2002). Legal framework of the management of the public Prosecutor’s office of Ukraine: Thesis for the degree of the Doctor of Juridical Sciences. Chernovcy, 396 p.