(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 11771-11790 | Article Number: ijese.2016.855
Published Online: November 18, 2016
Abstract
Modern education is aimed at training competent specialists, which requires modernizing the training process by implementing innovative technologies, especially information technologies. Information technologies allow quickly accessing necessary data, which speeds up the training process. This paper deals with issues related to training bachelors of transport for using information technology. The study offers the system of bachelor training for using information technology. The authors analyzed and substantiated the information-related disciplines, identified their setbacks and the necessity of using IT tools in the academic process of the university. The results show that using information technologies improves the level of education significantly. Students were found to be more interested in learning. Information technologies allow holding online conferences, which gives students the opportunity to share experience, discuss relevant issues, and seek ways to solve them. The results of the experiment showed that the group that trained according to the suggested methodical complex based on information technologies improved its level of professional competence by 25%.
Keywords: pedagogical system; information technology; organizational and technological activity; advanced technologies; abilities and skills (KAS).
References
Anton J.H. Boonen. (2014). The role of visual representation type, spatial ability, and reading comprehension in word problem solving: An item-level analysis in elementary school children International. Journal of Educational Research, 68, 15–26.
Bayne, S. (2015). “Posthumanism and Research in Digital Education.” In SAGE Handbook of E-learning Research, edited by Caroline Haythornthwaite. London: SAGE.
Benassi, V. A., Overson, C. E., & Hakala, C. M. (2014). Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum. Retrieved from the Society for the Teaching of Psychology web site: http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php
Bespal'ko V.P., Tatur Y.G. (1989). Systemic and methodological support of the education process related to specialist training.: Study Guide. M., Higher School, 144.
Bespal'ko V.P. (2008). Nature-aligned Pedagogy. М.: Public Education., 512.
Brown A., Bimrose J. (2014). Model of Learning for Career and Labour Mar.ket Transitions Research in Comparative and International Education September, 9: 270-286
Fry H., Ketteridge S. (2008). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: enhancing academic practice. Stephanie Marshall. 3rd ed.
Gabitova E.M., Vakhidova L.V., Steinberg V.E. (2015). Additional professional competence in the present-day expert training. Educational Technology, 4, 59-64.
Hamilton, Edward C., Friesen. N. (2013). “Online Education: A Science and Technology Studies Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(2),1–21.
Hamish Macleod, Christine Sinclair, Jeff Haywood & Amy Woodgate, (2016) Massive Open Online Courses: designing for the unknown learner. Teaching in Higher Education 21:1, pages 13-24.
Kuvshinov S.V. (2013). Conceptual foundations of the new Russian project “Digital Education”. Educational Technology, (3),58-61.
Laurillard, D. (2011). Productivity: Achieving Higher Quality and More Effective Learning in Affordable and Acceptable ways. A draft research-briefing document from the technology‐enhanced learning research programme. Accessed http://www.tlrp.org/docs/ProdBeta.pdf.
Macdonald, R. (2009). Academic Development. In: The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education. Edited by Malcolm Tight, Ko Ho Mok, Jeroen Huisman and Christopher. Morphew. New York: Routledge.
Makarenko A.S. 1978. The problem of school education. Selected pedagogical works in 2 volumes. 1. M.: Higher School, 367.
Ospanbekova M.N., Duisebekova A. E., Dauletova A. S., Bizhanova G. K. and Kara. A. B. (2016). Training Prospective Elementary School Teachers for Developing Reflection in Pupils Based on Innovative Technologies. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(7),2137-2150
Report to the European Commission on New modes of learning and teaching in higher education Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2014, 68.
Savvides N. (2014). Methodological Issues in International, Intercultural and Comparative Education Research in Comparative and International Education,9(4),370-374
Sergeev. S.F. (2013). Usability of information systems in education: basic methods of usability testing. Educational Technology. (3)96-102.
Simon, E. and Pleschová, G. (2012). Teacher Development in Higher Education. Existing Programs, Program Impact, and Future Trends. New York: Routledge.
UNESCO (2011). Summary of Progress towards Education for All. Working Document Prepared by UNESCO. Tenth Meeting of the High-Level Group on Education for All. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/ED/ED_new/pdf/Summary%20of%20 progress%20towards%20EFA-colors.pdf
Veledinskaya S.B., Dorofeeva M.Y. (2015). Effective support of e-learning: technologies aiming at the engagement and retention of pupils. Educational Technology. (3)104-115.
Yegorov V.V., Smirnova G.M., Zhilbaev Zh.O. (2005). Vocational education as a pedagogical system. Bulletin of the Karaganda University, (1),8-13.