(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 11757-11770 | Article Number: ijese.2016.854
Published Online: November 18, 2016
Abstract
The content of the poetic text concept and concept as ways of author's subjectivity representation and a modality as generation of discursive practice of the poet is opened. Features of development poetic the text and a concept as ways of author's subjectivity representation and a modality where the mentality and culture are reflected are revealed. In the course of study, the authors summarize the notion of modality. For the purposes of practical analysis, the works of English poetry were selected and studied. Taking into account the interrelation of author’s subjectivity and modality with the expression of attitude to the reality, the authors have analyzed them in the context of effect they make in the text. The research required analysis of the basic publications and studies that allowed the authors to found out main features, types and characteristics of modality in the text. The modality is researched on the different levels of its realization, such as lexical, phonetic and stylistic ones, in order to show its unique nature in each sentence. The author’s subjectivity was studied as the way of effecting on the reader’s mind. The Model of the poetic text formation and concept as ways of author's subjectivity representation and a modality is developed.
Keywords: author’s intentions; lexical units; stylistic device; semantic meaning; language category
References
American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. (2003). Retrieved from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/
Boyd, J., & Thorne, J. P. (1969). The semantics of modal verbs. Journal of Linguistics, 5(1), 57. http://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670000205X
Britsyn, V. M. (2006). Modal grammar of discourse as one of the directions of the semantic-syntactic researches. Linguistics2, (2–3), 101–110.
Butler, C. S. (1988). Politeness and the semantics of modalised derectives in English. In Linguistic in a systemic perspective (pp. 119–153). Amsterdam, Philadelphia.
Bybee, J., & Fleischman, S. (1995). Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins publ. со.
Coates, J. (1995). The expression of root and epistemic possibility in English. In The verb in contemporary English: Theory and description (pp. 145–156). Cambridge.
Collins English Dictionary. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/
Conradie, C. J. (1995). On subjectification in modal adverbs. In Historical linguistics (pp. 93–103). Amsterdam, Philadelphia.
Dickenson, E. (1862). The Poems. Retrieved from http://www.poemhunter.com/emily-dickinson/
Edgar, A.P. (2011). Complete Tales and Poems. Retrieved from http://www.web-books.com/
Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 828–852. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x
Hult, F. M. (2008). The History and Development of Educational Linguistics. In The Handbook of Educational Linguistics (pp. 10–24). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694138.ch2
Islamova, I. F. (2011). Theoretical issues of the modality category. Philology. Scientific Tatarstan, (4), 195–198.
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ldoceonline.com/
Macdonald, C. (1987). Modality in language and thinking: Some developmental psycholinguistic considerations. African Studies, 46(2), 211–227. http://doi.org/10.1080/00020188708707675
Mikhailenko, V. V. (2009). Modus marker in the structure of discourse. The Digest of Zhytomir State University, (45. Philological sciences), 30–33.
Momma, H. (1997). The composition of Old English poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Muldoon, P. (2003). Charles Baudelaire: “The Albatross.” Retrieved from http://www.everseradio.com/charles-baudelaire-the-albatross-by-paul-muldoon/
Natsuko, T. (2008). Linguistic Research and Language Teaching. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(2), 251–263.
Pennycook, A. (2008). Critical Applied Linguistics. In The Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 784–807). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch32
Random House Kernerman Webster’s College Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ldoceonline.com/
Sadovnikova, G. V. (2016). Distinctive Cognitive Features of Automotive Terminology Structure in American English and German Language. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1281–1296.
Shelley, P. B. (2003). The complete poetical works. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4800
Vintoniv, M. (2009). Sentences and expression in the modern linguistics: basic approaches to the analysis. Retrieved from http://archive.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/soc_gum/MV/2009_8/27.pdf
Vus, N. J. (2006). Modality and its interpretation in the works of scientists. Retrieved from http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/Soc_Gum/Slzb/2006_12/13_SlZb12_Vus.pdf