Characteristics of the Creative Development Technologies Applying During the Work With Students

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Krinitsyna, Nikitin & Boyakov, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Krinitsyna, A.V., Nikitin, O.D. & Boyakov, E.V. (2016). Characteristics of the Creative Development Technologies Applying During the Work With Students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), 11709-11720.

Harvard
In-text: (Krinitsyna, Nikitin and Boyakov, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Krinitsyna, A., Nikitin, O. and Boyakov, E. (2016). Characteristics of the Creative Development Technologies Applying During the Work With Students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), pp. 11709-11720.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Krinitsyna, Nikitin and Boyakov 2016)
Your Bibliography: Krinitsyna, Anastasiya Vyacheslavovna, Oleg Denisovich Nikitin and Ekaterina Vyacheslavovna Boyakov (2016). "Characteristics of the Creative Development Technologies Applying During the Work With Students". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (18):11709-11720.

Abstract

Present article explores the characteristics of the influence of creative influence technologies for school and college students on their professional and personal self-identification.

The aim of the study is students’ creative development, which represents the process of integration of mental, emotional and physical personality components, which is corrected by the psychological technologies.

Methodological bases of the study are the ideas about an integrative nature of development within the inseparable emotional, intellectual and personality domains; about creative work as a cultural-historic and social-cultural phenomenon; about aesthetic and creative cultures; and about creativity.

The result of the study consists of revealing the following directions of creative development as self-identification factors: students’ professional orientation, development of communicative skills and overcoming the difficulties in communication, exploring oneself and the world, adaptation to the educational environment and motivation towards creative activity.

The novelty of the study consists of developing a model and technologies that facilitate students’ creative resources actualization, which helps their creative development. Using the technologies of creative self-expression in the process of working with school and university students allows improving the level of students’ acquisition of the new knowledge and expands the field of application of this knowledge in further professional activity.

Keywords: creativity, students, school students, self-identification, creative technologies

References

Andreeva, G.M. (1980). Sotsialnaya psikhologiya. [Social psychology]. Moscow: Publisher Moscow University.

Bakushinskiy, A.V. (1981). Issledovaniya i statii. [Studies and articles]. Moscow: Sov. Khudozhnik.

Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. (2002). Psikhologiya tvorcheskikh sposobnostey: Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedeniy. [Psychology of creative skills: Textbook for students of higher educational institutions]. Moscow: “Akademiya”.

Druzhinin, V.N. (1996). Psikhodiagnostika obschikh sposobnostey. [Psychological diagnostics of general skills]. M: “Akademiya”.

Goldstein, D. and Kreger, O. (2014). Tvorcheskaya lichnost: Kak ispolzovat silnye storony svoego kharaktera dlya razvitiya kreativnosti. [Creative person: How to use strong sides of your personality for creativity development]. M: "Mann, Ivanov and Ferber".

Golubeva, E.A. (1993). Sposobnosti i individualnost. [Skills and individuality]. M: Prometheus.

Guilford, J. (1969). Tri storony intellekta. [Three sides of intelligence]. In: Psikhologiya myshleniya. Moscow: Progress, pp. 434-437.

Ilyin, E.P. (2012). Psikhologiya tvorchestva, kreativnosti, odarennosti. [Psichology of creating, creativity and giftedness]. St. Petersburg: Peter.

Jung, C. (1991). Arkhetip i simvol. [Archetype and symbol]. Moscow: Renaissance.

Kiseleva, M.V. (2006). Art-terapiya v rabote s detmi. [Art-therapy in working with children]. St. Petersburg: Speech.

Lebedeva, L.D. (2005). Praktika art-terapii: podkhody, diagnostika, sistema zanyatiy. [Art-therapy practice: approaches, diagnostics and system of lessons]. St. Petersburg: Speech.

Maslow, A. (1999). Motivatsiya i lichnost. [Motivation and personality]. St. Petersburg: Eurasia.

Melik-Pashaev, A.A. (2000). Mir khudozhnika. [The world of an artist]. Mjscow: Progress-Traditsiya.

Ponomarev, Ya.A. (1994). Psikhologiya tvorchestva: perspektivy razvitiya. [Psikhology of creating: perspectives of development]. Psychological journal, 6: 38-50.

Mironova E. E. (2006). Sbornik psikhologicheskikh testov. Chast II: Posobie. [Collection of psychological tests. Part II: Handbook]. Minsk: Female Institute ENVILA.

Tunik, E.E. (2002). Psikhodiagnostika tvorcheskogo myshleniya. Kreativnye testy. [Psychological diagnostics of creative thinking. Creative tests]. St. Petersburg: Publishing house “Didaktika Plyus”.

Vagin, Yu. (2002). Kreativnye i primitivnye. Osnovy ontogenetecheskoy personologii I psikhopatologii. [Creative and primitive. Fundamentals of ontogenetic personality studies and psychopathology]. Perm: PONICAA.

Vygotskiy, L.S. (1987). Psikhologiya iskusstva. [Psychology of art]. In M.G. Yaroshevskiy (Ed.). Moscow: Pedagogika.

Vygotskiy, L.S. (1991). Voobrazhenie i tvorchestvo v detskom vozraste. [Imagination and creativity in the childhood]. Moscow: Prosveschenie.

Yusov, B.P. (2004). Vzaimosvyaz kulturogennykh faktorov v formirovanii sovremennogo khudozhestvennogo myshleniya uchitelya obrazovatelnoy oblasti “Iskusstvo”. Izbrannye trudy po istorii, teorii i psikhologii khudozhestvennogo obrazovaniya i polikhudozhestvennogo vospitaniya detey. [Relation between culture-genetic factors in the development of a modern artistic thinking of a teacher in the educational area of Art. Selected works on history, theory and psychology of artistic education and multi-artistic mentoring of children]. Moscow: The company Sputnik +, pp. 76-84.