The Boy Scouts of America’s Environmental Science and Engineering merit badges are two of their over 120 merit badges offered as a part of a non-formal educational program to U.S. boys. The Scientific and Engineering Practices of the U.S. Next Generation Science Standards provide a vision of science education that includes integrating eight practices that engage youth in inquiry-based learning and investigative design and interpretation.  This exploratory study uses document analysis triangulated with a questionnaire under the general principles of program evaluation as a case study to examine the potential alignment of the Boy Scouts of America’s Environmental Science and Engineering merit badges and the Scientific and Engineering Practices of the NGSS. Merit badge requirements were matched with specific elements of the S&EP as described by the NGSS Appendix F progressions for middle school aged youth. The cognitive demand of the requirements was also analyzed using Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. Questionnaires were sent to volunteer merit badge counselors for one Midwestern U.S. Boy Scout council. Their responses were used to inform the analysis of the merit badge requirements.  The requirements for both of these badges show connections to several of the S&EP, especially S&EP 3: conducting investigation and S&EP 6: constructing explanations and designing solutions. Triangulating data from merit badge counselors show that Scouts in Engineering merit badge do engage in the engineering design process very much and potentially engage them in investigations and construction of explanations with Environmental Science. Several of the merit badge counselors were highly educated scientists and engineers. Often, these counselors reported engaging Scouts in a manner closest to the vision of the NGSS S&EP. One of the limitations of the Environmental Science merit badge is that investigations are mostly elective options.  This exploratory study concludes that the requirements for Boy Scout merit badges are designed in manners that can engage youth in the S&EP. Counselors do affect the extent to which these practices are incorporated. Future studies should examine the learning by youth from merit badges as related to S&EP and general science and engineering content knowledge.

Allen, S., Gutwill, J., Perry, D. L., Garibay, C., Ellenbogen, K. M., Heimlich, J. E., Reich, C.A., & Klein, C. (2007). Research in Museums: Coping with complexity. In J. H. Falk, L. D. Dierking, & S. Foutz (Eds.) In principle, in practice:  Museums as learning institutions (pp. 229–245), Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education:  Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026.

Bouzo,  S.  (2012). Engaging underserved audiences in informal science education through community-based partnerships (master’s thesis). Retrieved   from   Colorado   State University, Fort Collins, CO.  https://dspace.library.colostate.edu/handle/10217/71618

Boy Scouts of America (BSA).  (2013).  Merit badge counselor information.  Retrieved from http://www.scouting.org/filestore/pdf/34405.pdf

Chyung, S.Y. Wisniewski, A., Inderbitzen, B., & Campbell, D.  (2013).  Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(3), 87-115.

Davidson, E.J. (2005).  Evaluation methodology basics:  The nuts and bolts of sound evaluation.  Thousand Oaks, CA:  SAGE.

Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: The visitor experience and the making of meaning.  Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

Falk, J. H., Scott, C., Dierking, L., Rennie, L., & Jones, M. C. (2004).  Interactives and visitor learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 47(2), 171–198.

Ferreira, M. (2001). The effect of an after-school program addressing the gender and minority achievement gaps in science, mathematics, and engineering. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Spectrum, Educational Research Services.

Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28, 87–112.

Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50.

Jan, S.J., Johnson, B.R., & Kim, Y.  (2012).  Eagle Scouts:  Merit Beyond the Badge.  Waco, TX:  Baylor University.  Retrieved from http://www.baylorisr.org/wp-content/uploads/Boy-Scouts-Report.pdf

Jarman, R. (2005). Science learning through scouting: an understudied context for informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 427-450.

Jolly, E., Campbell, P., & Perlman, L. (2004). Engagement, capacity, continuity: A trilogy for student success. St. Paul, MN: GE Foundation and Science Museum of Minnesota.

Martin, L. M. (2004). An emerging research framework for studying informal learning and schools. Science Education, 88(Suppl. 1), S71–S82.

Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13-17.

Miller, F.A. & Alvarado, K. (2005). Incorporating documents into qualitative nursing research.  Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(4):348-353.

National Research Council. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. Philip Bell, Bruce Lewenstein, Andrew W. Shouse, and Michael A. Feder, Editors. Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. (2009). Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas.  Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Polson, E. C., Kim, Y., Jang, S. J., Johnson, B. R., & Smith, B. (2013). Being prepared and staying connected: Scouting's influence on social capital and community involvement. Social Science Quarterly, 94(3), 758-776.

Rahm, J., & Ash, D. (2008). Learning environments at the margin: Case studies of disenfranchised youth doing science in an aquarium and an after-school program.  Learning Environments Research, 11, 49-62.

Ramey-Gassert, L., Walberg, H., & Walberg, H. (1994). Reexamining connections: Museums as science learning environments. Science Education, 78(4), 345–363.

Renninger, A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (2014). The role of interest in learning and development. New York: Psychology Press.

Rennie, L. J., & McClafferty, T. P. (2002). Objects and learning:  Understanding young children’s interaction with science exhibits. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums (pp.191–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Riedinger, K. (2015).  Identity development of youth during participation at an informal science education camp.  International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(3), 453-475.

Sample McMeeking, L. B., Weinberg, A. E., Boyd, K. J. and Balgopal, M. M. (2016), Student Perceptions of interest, learning, and engagement from an informal traveling science museum. School Science and Mathematics, 116: 253–264. doi:10.1111/ssm.12176

Scriven, M. (2007).  Key evaluation checklist.  Retrieved from www.wmich.edu/evalctr/archive_checklists/kec_feb07.pdf

Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement.  The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332.

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York, NY: The Guilford Press

Tai, R.H., Liu, C.Q., Maltese, A.V., & Fan, X. (2006).  Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143-1144.

Tran, N. A. (2011). The relationship between students’ connections to out-of-school experiences and factors associated with science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33(12), 1625–1651.

Webb, N. (1997). Research Monograph Number 6: Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments on mathematics and science education.  Washington, D.C.: CCSSO.

Webb, N. (August 1999). Research Monograph No. 18: Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states. Washington, D.C.: CCSSO.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.