Published Issues

Volume 14 (2019)
Volume 14 Issue 9

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 8

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 7

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 6

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 5

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 4

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 3

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 2

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 1

(2019)
Volume 13 (2018)
Volume 13 Issue 10

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 9

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 8

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 7

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 6

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 5

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 4

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 3

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 2

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 1

(2018)
Volume 12 (2017)
Volume 12 Issue 10

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 9

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 8

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 7

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 6

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 5

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 4

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 3

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 2

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 1

(2017)
Volume 11 (2016)
Volume 11 Issue 18

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 17

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 16

Special Issue - (2016)
Volume 11 Issue 15

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 14

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 13

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 12

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 11

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 10

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 9

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 8

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 7

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 6

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 5

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 4

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 3

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 2

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 1

(2016)
Volume 10 (2015)
Volume 10 Issue 6

(2015)
Volume 10 Issue 5

(2015)
Volume 10 Issue 4

Special Issue - (2015)
Volume 10 Issue 3

(2015)
Volume 10 Issue 2

(2015)
Volume 10 Issue 1

(2015)
Volume 9 (2014)
Volume 9 Issue 4

(2014)
Volume 9 Issue 3

(2014)
Volume 9 Issue 2

(2014)
Volume 9 Issue 1

(2014)
Volume 8 (2013)
Volume 8 Issue 4

(2013)
Volume 8 Issue 3

(2013)
Volume 8 Issue 2

(2013)
Volume 8 Issue 1

(2013)
Volume 7 (2012)
Volume 7 Issue 4

(2012)
Volume 7 Issue 3

(2012)
Volume 7 Issue 2

(2012)
Volume 7 Issue 1

Special Issue - (2012)
Volume 6 (2011)
Volume 6 Issue 4

(2011)
Volume 6 Issue 3

(2011)
Volume 6 Issue 2

(2011)
Volume 6 Issue 1

(2011)
Volume 5 (2010)
Volume 5 Issue 4

(2010)
Volume 5 Issue 3

(2010)
Volume 5 Issue 2

(2010)
Volume 5 Issue 1

(2010)
Volume 4 (2009)
Volume 4 Issue 4

(2009)
Volume 4 Issue 3

(2009)
Volume 4 Issue 2

(2009)
Volume 4 Issue 1

(2009)
Volume 3 (2008)
Volume 3 Issue 4

(2008)
Volume 3 Issue 3

(2008)
Volume 3 Issue 2

(2008)
Volume 3 Issue 1

(2008)
Volume 2 (2007)
Volume 2 Issue 4

(2007)
Volume 2 Issue 3

(2007)
Volume 2 Issue 2

(2007)
Volume 2 Issue 1

(2007)
Volume 1 (2006)
Volume 1 Issue 2

(2006)
Volume 1 Issue 1

(2006)

Volume 3 Issue 2 (2008)

Computer Attitude, Ownership and Use as Predictors of Computer Literacy of Science Teachers in Nigeria

Babalola J. Ogunkola

pp. 53-57   |  Article Number: ijese.2008.016
Published Online: April 10, 2008

Full text PDF Citation
APA 6th edition
In-text: (Ogunkola, 2008)
Your Bibliography: Ogunkola, B.J. (2008). Computer Attitude, Ownership and Use as Predictors of Computer Literacy of Science Teachers in Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(2), 53-57.
Harvard
In-text: (Ogunkola, 2008)
Your Bibliography: Ogunkola, B. (2008). Computer Attitude, Ownership and Use as Predictors of Computer Literacy of Science Teachers in Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(2), pp. 53-57.
Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Ogunkola 2008)
Your Bibliography: Ogunkola, Babalola J. (2008). " Computer Attitude, Ownership and Use as Predictors of Computer Literacy of Science Teachers in Nigeria". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 3 (2):53-57.

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of computer attitude, ownership and use on the computer literacy of science teachers in Nigeria.  One hundred and twenty (120) science teachers drawn from the four political divisions of Ogun State, Nigeria were used for the study.  Two valid and reliable instruments namely Computer Attitude, Ownership and Use Scale (CAOUS) and Computer Literacy Self Assessment Scale (CLSAS) were used to collect the needed data.  Percentages, standard deviation and multiple regression statistics were employed for data analyses.  The findings revealed that the science teachers have positive attitude towards computer.  Also, a little above half of the science teachers had personal computers and not all the teachers used computers frequently.  Finally, computer attitude, ownership and frequency of use jointly predicted the science teachers’ computer literacy with the influence of computer ownership being the highest when considered individually. Suggestions based on these outcomes were presented in this paper.
 

Keywords: Computer attitude, Literacy, Science Teachers

References