This research reconstructs the traditions of scientific enlightenment in Russia. The turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries was chosen as the most representative period. The modern age saw the establishment of the optimal model for advancing science in the global context and its crucial segment – Russian science. This period was characterized by significant scientific and sociopolitical changes. The level of education in Russia was extremely low; good education was accessible only to the upper class. Therefore, a program for popularizing science was launched. This research investigates the means and methods that were used to popularize science in Russia. In order to achieve the set goal, a set of complementary methods was used, including analysis, didactic method, and structural-functional analysis. The research also generalizes the experience of Russian and foreign experts in the subject at hand and applies the principles of historicism, systematicity, and dialectic unity of the historical and the logical. The main means of popularization of science were as follows: publication of popular-science periodicals, granting of considerable autonomy to higher educational institutions, and establishment of out-of-school institutions. During the soviet period, the popularization of science continued, but in the light of Marxism-Leninism, which included the launch of a state program for eliminating illiteracy.

Apokov, A.I. (2012).  Popularization of science as a crucial link in the propaganda and advancement of research. Akopov A.I. Journalism: Research Papers, Articles, Notes, and Essays: Collection of Papers. Rostov-on-Don: North Caucasus Higher Education Research Center of the South Federal University Academy of Pedagogical and Social Sciences. 116-117.

Bailes, K.E. (2015). Technology and society under Lenin and Stalin: origins of the Soviet technical intelligentsia, 1917-1941. Princeton University Press.

Balashova, Yu.B. (2007). School journalism during the Silver Age. SPb.: Saint Petersburg University Publishing House, 114.

Chamberlin, W. H. (2014). The Russian Revolution, Volume I: 1917-1918: From the Overthrow of the Tsar to the Assumption of Power by the Bolsheviks. Princeton University Press.

Dagnino, R., Lima, M. T. & das Neves, E. F. (2016).  Popularization of Science in Brazil: getting onto the public agenda, but how? Democracy.28: 07.

Daly, J. (2014). Russian Citizenship: From Empire to Soviet Union. By Eric Lohr. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 278.

Elementary and secondary education in Saint Petersburg. (2000). Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries: Collection of Documents. SPb.: Liki Rossii, 172.

Ewing, E. (2014). History of 20th century fashion. Pavilion Books.

Ivanov, A.Ye. (1999). Russian students in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries: social and historical fate. M.: Russian Political Encyclopedia, 250, 251.

Kappeler, A. (2014). The Russian empire: A multi-ethnic history. Routledge.

Kusber, J. (2014). Cultural transfer as a field for the observation of historical cultural studies. The example of the Russian empire. Quaestio Rossica. 2: 233-251.

Landy, M. (2016). British Genres. Princeton University Pres.

Muravyeva, I.A. (2004). The modern age: panorama of life in the capital city. SPb.: Pushkin Foundation Publishing House, 2: 86.

Platonova, R.I., Shkurko, N.S., Lukina, T.N., Sentizova, M.I. & L.P. Bugaeva. (2016). Historical and Organizational Aspects of Pedagogical Practice Development within the System of Higher Education. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(7): 2515-2526.

Rindisbacher, H.J. (2014). Writing and Power: Soviet Literature of the 1920s and 1930s.

Rogaeva, I.E. (2015).  Study of the History the Russian Empire in Contemporary American Historiography: New Trends. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166: 647-650.

Von Haxthausen, B. (2013). The Russian Empire: Its People, Institutions and Resources (2 Vols). Routledge.

Wirtschafter, E.K. (2015). Social Identity in Imperial Russia. Northern Illinois University Press.