(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 11351-11360 | Article Number: ijese.2016.822
Published Online: November 18, 2016
Abstract
The article deals with the analysis of peculiarities of language acquisition assessment system in Kazakhstan – KAZTEST. The author pays attention to the role of control as a way of assessment students’ skills, habits and knowledge. In addition, author determined the place and functions of tests as a form of control. The author explores the specificity of testing in the educational system of Kazakhstan. KAZTEST system is the Kazakhstani system based on international standards. The KAZTEST system plays an important role in social and political life of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Its national peculiarities, advantages and disadvantages are determined in the present research. The background of KAZTEST formation and its role in society are under discussion in the framework of official language policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. However, besides Kazakhstan, the language policy problems are the inherent part of national policy in many multinational and multilingual countries.
Keywords: Testing, language acquisition, KAZTEST, multilinguism, multinational society
References
Abdyhalikov, A. T. & Sadvakasova, M. G. (2012). Assessment of the level of state language proficiency in the Republic of Kazakhstan nationals by means of testing. Direct access: http://m.kazakhtest.kz/ru/science/publications/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=693
Alderson, J. C., & Banerjee, J. (2002). Language testing and assessment (Part 2). Language Teaching, 35(2), 79-113. doi: 10.1017/S0261444802001751.
Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal 56(1), 57-64.
Assyltayeva, E., Aldubasheva, Z., Tolen, Z., Assyltayeva, Z., & Alimzhanova, A. (2012). Central Asia and Kazakhstan: In Search of Civic Identity. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 6(8), 2103-2106.
Avanesov, V. V. (2007). Test as a pedagogical system. Journal of Education Measurement, 1, 33-55.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. doi: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
Fierman, W. (2006). Language and education in post-Soviet Kazakhstan: Kazakhmedium instruction in urban schools. The Russian Review, 65(1), 98-116. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9434.2005.00388.x.
Gu, L. (2014). At the interface between language testing and second language acquisition: Language ability and context of learning. Language Testing, 31(1), 111-133. doi: 10.1177/0265532212469177.
Ibraeva, K. J. (2015). The use of new information and communication technologies in technical and vocational educational system. Journal of World and Science, 1(17), 67-72.
Kadyraliyeva, A., Zholdubayeva, A., Alimzhanova, A., Zhiyenbekova, A., & Asanov, S. (2013). Cultural Integration as a Factor of Genesis of the Kazakh Nation in the Conditions of Multicultural Society. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 7(6), 1691-1696.
Kadyraliyeva, A., Zholdubayeva, A., Gabitov, T., & Alimzhanova, A. (2014). Kazakhstan’s experience in the enhancement of the intercultural dialogue in a multicultural society. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 912-915. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.526.
Mun, O. (2014). Re-imagining national identity through early literacy textbooks in Kazakhstan. Lehigh University. Direct access: http://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd/1567.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090.
Ó Beacháin, D., & Kevlihan, R. (2013). Threading a needle: Kazakhstan between civic and ethno-nationalist state-building. Nations and Nationalism, 19(2), 337-356. doi: 10.1111/nana.12022.
Pavlenko, A. (2008). Multilingualism in Post-Soviet Countries: Language Revival, Language Removal, and Sociolinguistic Theory. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(3-4), 275-314. doi: 10.1080/13670050802271517.
Pavlov, N., Artemov, A., Sidorov, T. & Frolov, V. (2000). Control of students' knowledge. Journal of Higher Education In Russia, 1, 116-121.
Perzadayeva, S. A. (2014). Actual problems of knowledge control systems creation. In Seyfullinskie reading-10: New Perspectives preparation of competitive personnel and the role of science in country's industrial and innovation policy development (pp. 66-68). Astana: S.Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University.
Sadybekova, S. I. (2013). Introduction of multilingual education in universities of the Republic of Kazakhstan: problems and prospects. In N.V. Gedranovich & V.V. Susz (Eds.). Lifelong Education: continuing education for sustainable development (pp. 157-160). Minsk Institute of Management, Belarus.
Sagindikov, I. & Abdyhalikov, A. T. (2010). KAZTEST testing system formation. Journal of Іlіm-Education, 3(51), 11-20.
Stricker, L. J., Rock, D. A., & Lee, Y.-W. (2005). Factor structure of the languedgeTM test across language groups. Princeton, NJ.
Zaitseva, L. & Prokofiev, N. O. (2004). Models and methods for adaptive knowledge control. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 4(7), 265-277.