(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 11239-11247 | Article Number: ijese.2016.814
Published Online: November 11, 2016
Abstract
Our personality develops gradually, and this process is influenced by various factors, with language being one of the most important. We need to communicate with other people, to speak as much, as we need occupation, and this need determines the development of our personalities. Language is deeply embedded in our conscious and subconscious. Through language we perceive most of the information about the world and the way it is organised. It helps children identify themselves. By learning language, we acquire cognitive frames and schemes of possible actions, as well as behaviour models and patterns we can employ in various situations.
The article presents the analysis of the other works on the problem, performed in order to define dialogic communication, its characteristics, functions, and the role it plays in the development of personality. It also demonstrates why dialogic communication should be used more widely in schools.
The experiments conducted allowed us to determine the psychological and pedagogical conditions required for effective development of dialogic communication between teenagers. We also came to a conclusion that the effectiveness of dialogic communication in schools depends on the combination of various pedagogical conditions, including the teacher’s determination and motivation, the use of didactic literature, education methods, link between education and real life, speech norms, and communication standards.
Keywords: dialogue, dialogic communication, dialogic communication functions, communicant, dialogic speech
References
Agapova, S.A. (2004) Osnovy mezhlichnostnoj i mezhkul'turnoj kommunikacii [Foundations of interpersonal and intercultural communication]. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, pp. 288.
Bastrikova, E. M. (2004) Kommunikativnaja kompetencija kak lingvodidakticheskij fenomen [Communicative competence as a linguo-didactic issue]. Russian and contrastive linguistics: linguistic and cultural aspects. Kazan Federal University, Faculty of Philology, pp. 43-48.
Bloh, M.Ja. (2007) Dialog, monolog i faktor slushajushhego [Dialogue, monologue, and the factor of addressee]. Nauchn. tr. Moskovskogo pedagogicheskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologicheskie nauki: sb. Statej [Proceedings of Moscow State Pedagogical University. Philology]. Moscow, Prometej: MSPU Publishing House, pp. 159-168.
Bohm, D. (1996) On Dialogue. Edited by Lee Nichol. London, New York: Routledge.
Crossley, M. L. (2013) Narrativnaja psihologija. Samost', psihologicheskaja travma i konstruirovanie smyslov [Introducing narrative psychology: self, trauma and the construction of meaning] (O.V.Gritchina, Trans.), pp. 284.
Cypik, N. S. (2005) Pedagogicheskie osnovanija razvitija psihicheskoj motivacii shkol'nikov v processe obuchenija obshheniju [Pedagogical basis for psychological motivation for communication in schools]. Communication problems arising in school education process. Proceedings of scientific conference. Bashkortostan State Pedagogical University. Ufa, pp. 139-145.
D'jakonov, G. V. (2006) Psihologija dialoga: teoretiko-metodologicheskoe issledovanie [Psychology of dialogue - theory and methodology]. Kirovograd: Kirovohrad Volodymyr Vynnychenko State Pedagogical University, pp. 693.
Florenskaja, T. A. (2001) Dialog v prakticheskoj psihologi: nauka o dushe [Dialogue in applied psychology - the study of soul]. Moscow: Vlados Publishing, pp. 208.
Galickih, E. O. (2004) Dialog v obrazovanii kak sposob stanovlenija tolerantnosti: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie [Dialogue in education as a means of building up tolerance: study guide]. Moscow, Academichesky project, 240 p.
Harash, A. U. (1986) «Drugoj» i ego funkcii v razvitii «Ja» [Influence of “the other” on the development of “me”]. In A.A.Boldyrev (Eds.), Communication and psychogeny. Moscow: Publishing House of the Research Institute of General and Pedagogic Psychologi of the Academy of Pedagogical Science of the USSR, pp. 31-46.
Karpova, T.V. (2013) Obshhenie v kontekste socializacii shkol'nika [Communication as part of socialization in school]. Proceedings of Adyghe State University. Series 3: Pedagogics and Psychology, 2. http://vestnik.adygnet.ru/files/2013.2/2457/karpova2013_2.pdf
Lishin, O.V. (2007) Podrostok v jepohu peremen [Teen in an era of change]. World of psychology, 4 (52): 11-26.
Sedov, K. F. (2004) Diskurs i lichnost': jevoljucija kommunikativnoj kompetencii [Discourse and personality: Evolution of communicative competence]. Moscow: Labirint, pp. 320.
Sturikova, M.V. (2009) Ritorizacija obrazovatel'nogo processa kak razvitie kommunikativnoj kompetencii uchashhihsja i studentov [Discourse of the education process and developing communicative competence in pupils and students]. Education and Science. Ural Division of the Russian Academy of Education, 11.
Titova, S. V., Brychkova, Ja.V. and Fisenko, E.Ju. (2007) Smysloobrazujushhee obuchenie v obshheobrazovatel'noj shkole [Sensemaking education in schools]. Moscow, St. Petersburg.
Tokareva, N.N. (2013) Konstruktivnye modeli obshhenija podrostkov v formate uspeshnogo modelirovanija lichnosti [Prevention of deviant behavior in Russian youth as a social studies issue]. Historical and social-educational ideas, 6, 136-141.
Vaclavik, P., Bivin, D. and Dzhekson, D. (2000) Pragmatika chelovecheskih kommunikacij: izuchenie patternov, patologij i paradoksov vzaimodejstvij [Pragmatics of human communication: a study of patterns, pathologies and paradoxes]. Moscow: EKSMO.
Zabrodin, Ju. M. (2005a) Psihologicheskij analiz struktury otnoshenij i dinamiki lichnosti v social'no-psihologicheskom prostranstve [Psychological analysis of the personality’s structure and dynamics in socio-psychological space]. In O.Ya. Yemelianova Eds.), Proceedings of the international scientific conference Polycultural education space. Voronezh: Novy Vzglyad, pp. 20-29.
Zabrodin, Ju. M. (2005b) Social'noe prostranstvo v issledovanijah lichnosti [Social space and its role in the study of personality]. Social'no-psihologicheskie aspekty adaptacii i zashhishhennosti lichnosti: materialy mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo seminara [Social and psychological aspects of personality adaptation and safety -Proceedings of the international scientific workshop]. Voronezh: Voronezh State University, pp. 15-18.
Zhuravlev, A. L. (2007) Social'no-psihologicheskoe prostranstvo samopredeljajushhegosja subjekta: ponimanie, harakteristiki, vidy [Socio-psychological space of the person: definition, characteristics, types]. Journal of practical psychology of education, 2 (11), 7-13.