(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 11175-11193 | Article Number: ijese.2016.810
Published Online: November 11, 2016
Abstract
This article analyses the information and communications technology competencies (ICTC) of Master’s degree students in Kazakhstan. It defines the ICTC. Research results suggest that the majority of Master’s degree students have a low level of ICTC. Of prime importance is the fact that the level of research and educational aspects of the ICTC of Master’s degree students in the study is lower than the subject matter aspect. The research shows that teachers and advisers are faced with certain difficulties in organising Master’s students’ scientific research and educational internship. This leads to the need to create additional tools to provide a means of controlling the ICTC-shaping process of Master’s students. The research found that one the most effective tools promoting optimization while working with Master’s students in scientific research, educational and research internship is blended learning technology integrated into the university’s virtual and educational environment.
Keywords: Master’s Degree Student’s ICT competency, internship, virtual and educational environment, research activity, educational activity
References
Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., and Viñes, J. M. (2005). An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of educational technology, 36(2), 217-235. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00454.x.
Bailey, M., and Sorensen, P. (2013). Reclaiming the ground of master’s education for teachers: lessons to be learned from a case study of the East Midlands Masters in Teaching and Learning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 39(1), 39-59. DOI: 10.1080/02607476.2012.733190.
Bianchi, M., Hernández-Lara, A. B., and Gualdi, D. (2015). The contribution of virtual enterprises to competence-based learning: an assessment from the students’ perspective: Case study. Technology, Innovation and Education, 1(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1186/s40660-015-0005-x.
Bonk, C. J., and Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley and Sons.
Bourke, S., and Holbrook, A. P. (2013). Examining PhD and research masters theses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(4), 407-416. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2011.638738.
Brooks, C., Brant, J., Abrahams, I., and Yandell, J. (2012). Valuing initial teacher education at Master’s level. Teacher development, 16(3), 285-302. DOI: 10.1080/13664530.2012.688674.
Brown, C. (2002). Simple and effective-teacher roles remain a powerful framework to embed ICT within the practice of teaching. Technology and teacher education annual, 2, 1252-1256.
Castle, K., Peiser, G., and Smith, E. (2013). Teacher development through the Masters in Teaching and Learning: a lost opportunity. Journal of Education for Teaching, 39(1), 30-38. DOI: 10.1080/02607476.2012.733189.
Gerova, N. (2014). Methodical system of future teachers’ information training in higher education. In SGEM Conference on Psychology and Psychiatry, Sociology and Healthcare, Education (Vol. 3, pp. 541-547). September 1-9. DOI: 10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2014/B13/S3.072.
Harrison, P., and Edwards, C. (2012). A partnership approach to action learning within a masters educational program. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 9(1), 45-50. DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2012.656890.
Kehm, B. M., and Teichler, U. (2006). Which direction for bachelor and master programs? A stocktaking of the Bologna process. Tertiary Education and Management, 12(4), 269-282. DOI: 10.1007/s11233-006-9008-1.
Keys, M. (2015). Evaluating the Impact on Practice of Online Child Protection Education at Master’s level. Social Work Education, 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2015.1117065.
Lapchik M. (2007). The ICT Competency of Teaching Staff – Omsk: OmGPU Publishing, 144 p.
Larsen, A. K., Sanders, R., Astray, A. A., and Hole, G. O. 2008. E‐teacher Challenges and Competences in International Comparative Social Work Courses. Social Work Education, 27(6), 623-633. DOI: 10.1080/02615470802201671.
Lavonen, J., Lattu, M., Juuti, K., and Meisalo, V. (2006). Strategy‐based development of teacher educators' ICT competence through a co‐operative staff development project. European Journal of Teacher Education, 29(2), 241-265. DOI: 10.1080/02619760600617433.
Lub, A., van der Wende, M., and Witte, J. (2003). Bachelor‐master programs in the netherlands and Germany. Tertiary Education & Management, 9(4), 249-266. DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2003.9967108.
McGarr, O., and O'Brien, J. (2007). Teacher professional development and ICT: an investigation of teachers studying a postgraduate award in ICT in education. Irish Educational Studies, 26(2), 145-162. DOI: 10.1080/03323310701295872.
Porlán, I. G., and Sánchez, J. L. S. (2016). Evaluation and development of digital competence in future primary school teachers at the University of Murcia. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 5(1), 51-56. DOI: 10.7821/naer.2016.1.152.
O'Reilly, D. (1996). Becoming a Master in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Some issues raised by problematizing ‘Mastery’ on a learner‐led MA program. The International Journal for Academic Development, 1(2), 73-79. DOI: 10.1080/1360144960010210.
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., and Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS quarterly, 401-426. DOI: 10.2307/3250989.
Pombo, L., and Costa, N. (2009). The impact of biology/geology school teachers masters courses on the improvement of science education quality in Portugal. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(1), 31-44. DOI: 10.1080/02635140802658818.
Roberts, K. A., and Wilson, R. W. (2002). ICT and the research process: Issues around the compatibility of technology with qualitative data analysis. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2).
Rogers, L., and Twidle, J. (2013). A pedagogical framework for developing innovative science teachers with ICT. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(3), 227-251. DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2013.833900.
Rowland, S. (1996). Relationships between teaching and research. Teaching in higher education, 1(1), 7-20. DOI: 10.1080/1356251960010102.
Savin-Baden, M., Gourlay, L., Tombs, C., Steils, N., Tombs, G., and Mawer, M. (2010). Situating pedagogies, positions and practices in immersive virtual worlds. Educational Research, 52(2), 123-133. DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2010.482732.
Sipilä, K. (2014). Educational use of information and communications technology: teachers’ perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(2), 225-241. DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2013.813407.
State Obligatory Standard of Postgraduate Education. Approved by the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated August 23. (2012). No. 1080.
Stiles, M. J. (2000). Effective learning and the virtual learning environment. In Proceedings: EUNIS 2000–Towards Virtual Universities, Instytut Informatyki Politechniki Poznanskiej.
Suleymenov, Y. Z. and Kulevskaya Y. G. (2007). Training Top-Qualification Specialists for Innovative Development of Kazakhstan. The Materials of the International Applied Science Conference “Training Top-Qualification Academic Staff in the Conditions of Innovative Economy Development. The Regional, Trans-Regional and International Aspects”, Minsk, May-June 30th–1st.
Suzuki, K. (2009). From Competency List to Curriculum Implementation: A Case Study of Japan's First Online Master’s Program for E-Learning Specialists Training. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(4), 469-478.
Toni Mohr, A., Holtbrügge, D., and Berg, N. (2012). Learning style preferences and the perceived usefulness of e-learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(3), 309-322. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2011.640999.
The descriptor for the second cycle in the Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area corresponds to the learning outcomes for EQF level 7 https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/en/content/descriptors-page.
Twalib, S., Lynton, A., Buttsworth, A., Boyes, C., Goessmann, F., Ricketts, M., and Lynton, S. (2012). Survey report: ICT in the Research Workflow.
Van Raaij, E. M., and Schepers, J. J. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838-852. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001.
Verhoeven, J. C., Heerwegh, D., and De Wit, K. (2016). ICT learning experience and research orientation as predictors of ICT skills and the ICT use of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 21(1), 71-103. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-014-9310-3.
Vesterinen, O., Toom, A., and Krokfors, L. (2014). From action to understanding–student teachers’ learning and practical reasoning during teaching practice. Reflective Practice, 15(5), 618-633. DOI: 10.1080/14623943.2014.900028.