Based on the materials of federal statistical surveys and expert assessments, the article analyzes features, quantitative scale, and structural peculiarities of precarization of labor relations in modern Russia. Such unstable forms of employment as work on fixed-term employment contracts, part-time employment and work in the informal economy have been singled out and are characterized in a dynamic measurement as the employment crisis indicators. In addition, dynamics of employment, inadequate working conditions and failure of employers to payroll obligations have been considered as signs of precarization.

Antonova, G. The scope of application of temporary employment in the Russian Federation and the EU countries. Central Bureau of labor standards. http://cbnt.ru/analytics/rynok_truda/2012/13. Date accessed: 18.08.2016.

Bobkov, V.N., Verdyuk, O.V., Kolosova, R.P., Razumova, T.O. (2015). Employment and social precarisation in Russia: introduction to analysis. Moscow: The new chronograph.

Compiled according to the Federal State Statistics Service (2015). http://www.gks.ru. Date accessed: 01.08.2016.

Eurostat Statistics Database. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lfs/ data/database.

Fedorova, Ye.P., Yakovleva, A.V. (2014). Informal Employment in Russia: Trends, Causes. National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics. A series of Economics and Environmental Management, 1.

Fedorovaya, A.E., Parasyukevich, A.M. (2013). Precarization of employment and its impact on the socio-economic well-being of employees. Proceedings of the Ural State Economic University, No. 5.

Furlong, A. (2007). The zone of precarity and discourses of vulnerability: NEET in the UK (Comparative Studies on NEET, Freeter, and Unemployed Youth in Japan and the UK). Tokyo Metropolitan University, 42, 101-121

Gasyukova, Ye. N. (2015). Precarization: conceptual bases, factors and evaluation. The world and Russia. Problem analysis and public management design, 8, (6), 28-46.

Gialis, S., Tsampra, M. (2015). The diverse regional patterns of atypical employment in Greece: Production restructuring, re/deregulation and flexicurity under crisis. Geoforum, 62, 175-187.

Golenkova, Z.T., Goliusova, Yu.V. (2013). New social groups in modern systems of stratification of the global society. The sociological science and social practice, 3.

Golodets, O. (2013). 38 mln Russians are employed “in the middle of nowhere and what”. Vedomosti. https://www.vedomosti.ru/management/articles/2013/04/03/vicepremer_golodec_38_mln_rossiyan_zanyaty_neponyatno_gde_i. Date accessed: 9.08.2016.

Gonzales, A. (2016). Neoliberalism, the homeland security state, and the authoritarian turn. Latino Studies, 14 (1), 80-98.

Gorshkov, M.K., Petukhov, V.V. (2015). Russian society and the challenges of the time. Book Two. Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow: Ves Mir Publisher, 49-51.

Kidder, J.L. (2016). Hollywood, Bike Messengers, and the New Economy Critical Sociology, 42 (2), 307-322.

Kolot, A.M. (2014). Transformation of Employment Institute as a part of global changes in the social and labor sphere: the phenomenon of precarization. The labor market and employment, 3.

Pilling, D. (2014). Japan is creating jobs but workers do not prosper. Casualisation of the workforce is stifling the reflationary experiment. Financial Times.

Posukhova, O.Yu. (2015a). Formation of a professional career in modern Russian society. Rostov-on-Don: The Foundation of Science and Education.

Posukhova, O.Yu. (2015b). Categorization of professional careers in the context of the phenomenological interpretation of social reality. Bulletin of the Adygeya State University. Series 1: Area Studies: philosophy, history, sociology, law, political science, cultural studies, 3, 168-174.

Public Opinion Foundation. (2016). Survey of Russian citizens 18 years and older. 29 May 2016 53 the subject of the Russian Federation, 104 settlements, 1,500 respondents. Interview in the community. Statpogreshnost not exceed 3.6%. Russians on the work and the probability of employment in case of dismissal. http://fom.ru/Rabota-i-dom/12717. Date accessed: 07.08.2016.

Russia: Informal employment as a new phenomenon (2014). Center for Macroeconomic Research of Sberbank of Russia.

Shkaratan, O. I., Karacharovskiy, V. V., Gasyukova, Ye. N. (2015). Precariat: Theory and Empirical Analysis (on materials of surveys in Russia, 1994-2013). Sociological studies, 12, 99-110.

Standing, G. (2014). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. Moscow: Ad Marginem.

Syed, I. (2016). Labor Exploitation and Health Inequities among Market Migrants: A Political Economy Perspective. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 17(2), 449-465 

The European labor market has not recovered from the crisis of the late 2000s. (2016). Research portal RuBaltic.Ru. http://www.rubaltic.ru/article/politika-i-obshchestvo/270116-rynok-truda/. Date accessed: 11.08.2016.

Toma, S. (2016). The role of migrant networks in the labour market outcomes of Senegalese men: how destination contexts matter. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39 (4), 593-613;

Toshchenko, Zh. T. (2015). The Precariat: The New Social Class. Sociological studies, 6.

Waite, L. (2009). A place and space for a critical geography of precarity? Geography Compass, 3(1), 412-433.

Weeks, S. (2015). Longing for “Normal” Post‐Fordism: Cape Verdean Labor‐Power on a Lisbon Periphery in Crisis. Anthropology of Work Review, 36(1), 13-25.