(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 10999-11006 | Article Number: ijese.2016.798
Published Online: November 11, 2016
Abstract
The relevance of the research problem is conditioned by the fact that with the increasing number of crimes against the international ecological safety the unresolved issues of jurisdiction of courts on Affairs about crimes of this type give rise to the problem of determining of the proper court, which in accordance with the regulatory order may consider and render decisions on cases of crimes of this type. The purpose of this paper is to determine the mechanisms influencing the decision of the jurisdictional questions. As a leading approach to the study of the problem a comparison of the studied materials on international treaties, conferences and meetings are selected focused on efforts aimed at institutionalization of the ability to attract individuals to international criminal responsibility who are accused of encroachment on the natural environment. The study of the legal nature of liability for acts that infringe on international environmental security, the necessity of creating mechanisms of these decisions is justified, the conclusion about the necessity of a decision’s making or the establishment of an international specialized court or the jurisdiction’s spreading of the international criminal court on the above-mentioned acts is formulated. The paper may be useful for the validation and regulatory consolidation of the concepts and characteristics of these offences, as well as to address enforcement issues to determine the proper court.
Keywords: International environmental security, environmental crime, international jurisdiction, hearing of criminal cases in the courts
References
Bechor, G. (2007). The Sanhuri Code and the Emergence of Modern Arab Civil Lav (1932 to 1949). London: BRILL, 344 p.
Brinchuk, M.M. (2008). Environmental security as a legal category. The state and law, 9, 30-42.
Ecological Bulletin. (1977). 98 p.
Ferenz, B. (1983). Enforcing international Law – A Way to World Peace. London: Rutledge, 85 p.
Gaevskaya, E.Y. (2015). Criminal law as a means of ensuring environmental security. Russian law journal, 1, 117 - 123.
Grotius, H. (1956). On the law of war and peace. Moscow: Znanie, 395 p.
Hefendehl, R. (2006). Europäisches Strafrecht: bis wohin und nicht weiter? Ibid, 6, 229 – 236.
Henke, C.C. (2015). Legitimation und richterliche Entscheidung: Weshalb eine behutsame Fortentwicklung der traditionellen juristischen Methode zweckmäßig ist. Zeitschrift für internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik (ZIS). Kiel, 110-118.
Khludneva, N.I. (2014). Defects of legal regulation of environmental protection. Moscow: Znanie, 248 p.
Kibalnik, A.G. & Solomonenko, I.G. (2004) Crimes against the world and security of mankind. St. Petersburg: Law center Press, 383 p.
Krasnova, I.O. (2014). Environmental security as a legal category. Lex russica, 5, 543 - 555 p.
Maksimov, A.M. (2015). Criminal policy in the sphere of ensuring safety of the animal world: criminal law and criminological aspects (Doctoral dissertation). Krasnodar.
Momirov, A. & Fourie, A.N. (2009). Vertical comparative law methods: tools for conceptualising the international rule of law. Erasmus Law Review, 2(3), 82– 86.
Neshataeva, T.N., Djachenko, E.B. & Myslinskiy, P.P. (2015). Eurasian integration: the role of the court. Moscow: Norma, 326 p.
Nikishin, V.V. (2015). Ways to protect the rights of nature users: the experience of judicial practice on cases arising from public legal relations. St. Petersburg lawyer, 5(9), 143-150
Petrov, V.V. (2009). Environmental code of Russia (for adoption by the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation Law "On environmental protection"). Environmental law, 2, 111-125.
Popov, I.V. (2014). Crimes against the natural environment: the theoretical basis and practice of application (Doctoral dissertation). Ekaterinburg.
Schepel’kov, V.F. & Lukjanov, V.V. (2014). Criminal law of Russia. Special part. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University, 764 p.
Schwarze, J. (2002). Judical review in EC law some reflections on the origins and the actual legal situation. International and comparative law, 51(1), 1733 p. Cit. by: the Social Sciences and Humanities. (2003). Domestic and foreign literature. Series 4: state and law, 174-176.
Shibaeva, E.A. (1986). Law of international organizations: issues of theory. Moscow: Nauka, 386 p.
The Constitution of the Russian Federation: adopted by popular vote in December 12, 1993. (2003). Direct access: http://russianunesco.ru/rus/article/747
Tikhomirov, Y.A. (1995). Public law. Moscow: Znanie, 428 p.
Tranin, A.A. (2014). Legal problems of environmental development of modern Russia. Moscow: Nauka, 214 p.
Vasiljeva, M.I. (2012). On the balance of interest and public rights in environmental offences. Environmental law, 4, 28 – 33.
Vinogradova, E.V. (2001). Crimes against environmental safety (Doctoral dissertation). Stavropol.
Waldock, H. (1962). General couts on public international law. Records of Couts, 1, 129-131.
Zhalinsky, A.E. (2009). Criminal law in anticipation of changes: theoretical and instrumental analysis. Moscow: Znanie, 429 p.
Zharikov, Y.G. (2015). Environmental priorities in natural resource law. Journal of Russian law, 2, 5-15 p.