(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 10987-10997 | Article Number: ijese.2016.797
Published Online: November 11, 2016
Abstract
The relevance of the study is conditioned by intensive introduction of information technologies in the educational process of the University. Analysis of practical activities of University groups shows that in the absence of science–based approaches to the implementation of information technologies in the educational process, there are increasing numbers of side effects among the students and graduates: moral and ethical indifference, a decrease in the level of personal communication, interpersonal communication, motivation to learn, and strengthening of computer and network addiction, the substitution of virtual reality, alienation from professional activities and other real-world problems, "escape" into virtual reality. In this regard, priority attention in the paper is devoted to establishing the theoretical and methodological approaches to realization of social–pedagogical priorities of the educational process at the University, which are presented as didactic components (target, content, procedural and technological, resource) of information technology. The paper presents the discourse of the concept "social–pedagogical priorities of the educational process at the University"; on the basis of the results of the study the complex of social and pedagogical priorities of the educational process is revealed, which are presented as the target, content, procedural and technological, resource components of information technology; pedagogical approaches to the design of new, hybrid types of information technologies are justified; the efficacy of the established set of priorities with the help of motivational, cognitive, axiological and activity-related criteria is proven.
Keywords: Socio–pedagogical priorities, educational process of modern University, teaching tools, information technology, network technology, hybrid technology
References
Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1995). The social construction of reality: a Treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Moscow: A Medium.
Bono, E. (1998). Lateral thinking. St.Petersburg: Peter.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Structure. Habitus. Practices. Modern social theory. St. Petersburg: Aletheia.
Choshanov, M.A. (2013). Evolution of views on didactics: is it time for a new didactics? Didactics of vocational schools. Kazan: Publishing House "Danis".
D`Angelo, G. (2007). From Didactics to e – Didactics: e – learning Paradigms Models and Techniques. Napoli: Liguori.
Delors, J. (1996). Education: a hidden treasure. Paris: UNESCO.
Erdniev, P.M. (1992). Integration of didactic units as technology training. Moscow: Education.
Isaev, I.F. (2001). High school teacher in U.S. Professional teacher training. Belgorod: Publishing House in BSU.
Khutorskoy, A.V. (2001). Modern didactics. St.Petersburg: Peter.
Klarin, M.V. (2002). Learning technology: the ideal and the reality. Moscow: Nauka.
Marchenkova, N.G. (2009). Socio-pedagogical aspects of prevention of computer dependency of students. Orenburg: Print – service.
Mitra, S. (2005). Self organizing systems for mass computer literacy: Findings from the «hole in the vall» experiments. International Journal for Development Issues, 4(1), 71 – 81.
Nordkvelle Y.T. (2003). Didactics: From classical rhetoric to kithen – Latin. Pedagogy. Coulture & Society, 11(3), 315 – 330.
Novikov, A.M. (2006). Methodology of education. Moscow: Agues.
Ostrovsky, A.M. (2003). The optimization of social management by human – computer systems in technical University. Belgorod: Belaudit.
Ruthven, K. (2012). The didactical tetrahedron as a heuristic for analyzing the incorporation of digital technologies into classroom practice in support of investigative approaches to teaching mathematics. ZDM, 44(5), 627 – 640.
Schoenfeld, A. (2012). Problematizing the didactical triangle. ZDM, 44(5), 587 – 599.
Selevko, G.K. (2006). Encyclopedia of educational technology. Moscow: Publishing house Research Institute of school technologies.
Stromfeldt, М. (1996). Window dressing. Clicking in: hot links to a digital culture. In L.H Leeson (Eds.). Seattle: Bay Press, 140-147.
Polat, E.S. (2000). The Internet in Humanities education. Moscow: Vlados.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Vjugina, S.V. (2010). Methodological basis of development of intellectual potential of students in technological University. Kazan: Publishing house: KSTU.
Yakimanskaya, I.S. (2000). Technology of personality – oriented education. Moscow: September.
Young, K.S. (1997). What makes the Internet Addictive: potential explanations for pathological Internet use. Paper presented at the 105th annual conference of the American Psychological Association. Chicago. IL.
Zizek, S. (1996). From virtual reality to the virtualization of reality. Electronic culture: technology and visual representation. In T.Druckrey (Eds.). New York: Aperture, 290-296.