(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 10911-10922 | Article Number: ijese.2016.791
Published Online: November 11, 2016
Abstract
The relevance of the investigated problem is caused by the need for monitoring the impact of the Unified State Examination (USE) on the level of mathematical culture and the level of geometric literacy of applicants and students of modern engineering universities of Russia. The need to determine the position of Descriptive Geometry in the structure of modern higher engineering education. The aim of the article is to study the USE impact on the overall level of training, including the level of geometric literacy of applicants and students of technical universities in Russia. The identification of the specific features of the modern structure of higher engineering education in Russia. The determination of the position of Descriptive Geometry in this structure. The leading approach to the study, which is in the solution of this problem, is to monitor the current USE system, and to monitor the structure of modern higher engineering education in Russia. This is an integrated approach, which allows to address this issue as a process of purposeful national formation of the best overall level of mathematical culture to students of technical universities in Russia. The article presents the results of monitoring of the USE impact on the overall level of training, including the level of geometric literacy of applicants of technical universities in Russia. The results of monitoring of the specifics of the existing structure of modern higher engineering education in Russia. The place of Descriptive Geometry in it. The structure of training of students of Descriptive Geometry at the St. Petersburg Mining University. Article Submissions are of practical value to teachers of technical universities, their adaptation to modern conditions of professional work in higher engineering education.
Keywords: Unified State Examination (USE), the structure of higher engineering education, teaching and methodical complex (TMC), descriptive geometry (DG), the state-funded places, the applicants, the level of geometric literacy
References
Berzin, B.Y., Berzin, A.B. & Maltsev, А.V. (2016). Uniform State Exam: management novella or a vital necessity? Teacher education in Russia, 6, 160-165.
Dale, R. (2005). Globalization, knowledge economy and comparative education. Comparative Education Review, Chicago, 2, 117-149.
Dale, R. (2009). Different Roles, Purposes and Outcomes of National and Regional Models of Education. Educ. Soc., 30, 108-119.
Heifetz, A.L. (2016). Descriptive geometry as "Running in the bags." Quality problems of graphic preparation of students in a technical college: tradition and innovation, 1, 298-325.
Khairullina, E.R., Pochinova, T.V., Khisamiyeva, L.G., Sakhipova, Z. M., Fedorova, L.V., Ablyasova, A.G., Aksenova, & N.N. (2015). The competences model of competitive process engineer. Journal of sustainable development, 3, 250-255.
Kondo, K., Mende, K. & Suzuki, K. (2005). Present Status of Graphics Science and Graphics Representation Education in Japan. Journal for Geometry and Graphics, 9, 77–87.
Levina, E.Y., Voronina, M.V., Rybolovleva, A.A., Sharafutdinova, M.M., Zhandarova, L.F. & Avilova, V.V. (2016). The Concepts of Informational Approach to the Management of Higher Education’s Development. International journal of environmental & science education, 11, 9913-9922.
Moroz, O.N., Voronina M.V. & Tretyakova Z.O. (2016). The use of modern technologies in the teaching discipline "Engineering graphics" for foreign students. Modern education: content, technology, quality, 1, 323-324.
Moroz, O.N., Folomkin, A.I. & Tretyakova, Z.O. (2016). The development of e-learning systems for descriptive geometry. Proceedings of the all-Russian scientific-practical conference "Informational systems and technologies in modeling and control". Yalta: Humanitarian-pedagogical University of Federal State Autonomous educational institution, Kazan Federal University V.I. Vernadsky named; Saint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University V.I. Ulyanov (Lenin) named ("LETI"), 182-184.
Prahov, I.A. (2015). Barriers to access to quality higher education in the conditions of the exam: the family and the school as a deterrent. Education, 1, 88-117.
Russian Education (2016). Federal portal. Direct access: http://www.edu.ru/abitur/act.96/index.php.
Saprykin, D.L. (2005). State and fundamental education: national models. High education in the Russian, 1, 148-156.
Saprykin, D.L. (2013). The “golden age” of Russian science and technology and the “classical” approach to engineering education. Questions of history of natural science and technology, 1, 28-66.
Saprykin, D.L. (2012a). Engineering education in Russia: history, conception, future trends. High education in the Russian, 1, 125-137.
Saprykin, D.L. (2012b). The history of engineering education in Russia, Europe and the USA: the development of institutions and quantitative assessment. Questions of history of natural science and technology, 4, 51-90.
Stachel, H. (1994). Descriptive Geometry, the Art of Grasping Spatial Relations. Proceedings 6th ICECGDG in Tokyo, 2, 533-535.
Surinkova, P. (2014). Modern descriptive geometry. Proceedings of the conference on mathematics teachers of all types and levels of schools. Czech Republic, 199-204.
Suzuki, K. (2002). The activities of the Japanese Society of graphic science - research and education. Geometry and Graphics Magazine, 6(2), 221-229.
Tretyakova Z.O. & Voronina M.V. (2016). Geometric modeling in descriptive geometry. Modern education: content, technology, quality. Saint-Petersburg, Russia: Saint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University V. I. Ulyanov named, 324-326
Tretyakova, Z.O. (2012). The place and importance of graphic preparation of specialists of technical specialties in higher education. The collection of materials of the VIII International scientific-practical conference "Education and Science of the XXI century" Volume 24 "Pedagogical sciences". Prague, 3-4
Tretyakova, Z.O. (2015). The role of the graphic preparation of the engineering staff in the modern world. Proceedings of the II International Scientific Conference "Modern educational technology in the teaching of natural sciences and the humanities". Saint-Petersburg, Russia: Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 433-437.
Valeeva, R.A. & Bushmeleva, N.A. (2016). Forming Analytical Competency of Higher School Students. IEJME Mathematics Education, 11(8), 3137-3148.
Voronina M.V., Moroz, O.N. & Tretyakova, Z.O. (2016). Application of parametric of implied dependencies in the course "Computer graphic". Proceedings of the III International scientific-methodical conference "Modern educational technology in the teaching of science and the humanities". Saint-Petersburg, Russia: Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 259-264.
Voronina M.V. & Tretyakova Z.O. (2015). Training foreign students learning the subject "Descriptive geometry, engineering and computer graphics" in the Technical Russian University in Russian language as foreign language: problems and solutions. Proceedings of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference "Actual problems of the humanities in the Technical University". Saint-Petersburg, Russia: Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 274-277.
Zaitseva, E.V., Lebedev, O.V., Sokolov, V.M. & Kruglov, S.S. (2011). The results of the exam and the success of training physical and mathematical disciplines of students of the first university courses. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University, Lobachevsky named, 3, 47-54.