(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 10875-10883 | Article Number: ijese.2016.787
Published Online: November 11, 2016
Abstract
The need to ensure equal rights to different age groups without discrimination in our country necessitates the study of international experience. One of the traditional and at the same time, urgent problems in the USA is the problem of age equality and the overcoming of discriminatory theory and practice. The goal of the study is to analyze the genesis of the system of legal safeguards against age discrimination in the U.S. legislation and the practice of the United States Supreme Court. Methodological potential includes methods of comparative historical and legal analysis. The development of the United States Supreme Court and other federal courts on age discrimination was investigated, the grounds for the institute emergence were analyzed, and its discriminatory nature, causes and conditions of its assessment in the decisions of the US Supreme Court were revealed.
Keywords: Constitutional principle of equality, US Supreme Court, age discrimination, employment, US higher education
References
Age Discrimination (1967). US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Direct access: https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/publications/age.cfm
Ageism in America (2006). In: The Anti-Ageism. Taskforce at The International Longevity Center. New York: The International Longevity Center-USA, 113 p.
Almanac. Facts about Higher Education in the United States. Each of 50 States and D.C. (2006).The Chronicle of Higher Education, 1, 3-91.
Barnes, P.G. (2016). Overcoming Age Discrimination in Employment: An Essential Guide for Workers, Advocates and Employers. Milton Keynes: Lightning source inc., 249 p.
Faust, R.M. (2003). Discrimination because of age – are professors different? Direct access: https://www.midwestacademyorg/Proceedings/2003/papers/faust.doc
Feder, J. (2010). The Age Discrimination in Employment Act. A Legal Overview Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, 16 p.
Friedman, L.M. (2005). A History of American law. New York: A Touchstone book, 620 p.
Gover, J. & McClure, G. (2004). The realities of Age discrimination. Direct access: http:// www.todaysengineer.org/2004/Feb?age.discrimination.asp
Helping to Ensure Equal Access to Education. Report to the President and Secretary of Education. FY 2009-2012. (2012). U.S. Department of Education. Office for Civil Rights. Washington: GPO, 65 p.
Kaplin, W.A. & Lee, B.A. (2007). The Law of Higher Education. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons Inc, 713 p.
Kena, G., Musu-Gillette, L., Robinson, J., Wang X., Rathbun, A., Zhang, J., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., Barmer, A. & Dunlop, V.E. (2015). The Condition of Education 2015. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, 305 p.
Kolpina, L.V. (2015). Gerontological ageism in healthcare institutions and social protection and its overcoming directions. Scientific bulletin. Series Medicine. Pharmacy, 10(207), 144-151.
Lahey, J. (2008). State Age Protection Laws and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The Journal of Law & Economics, 3, 433-460.
Landsberg, B.K. (2004). Major Acts of Congress. New York: MacMillan Reference, 375 p.
Miklyaeva, A.V. (2009). Research methods of ageism: the foreign experience. Herald of Herzen SPU, 100, 148-155.
Modernizing the Older Americans Act. Recommendations for the 112th Congress (2011). Washington: Age Action, 36 p.
Neumark, D. & Song, J. (2013). Do stronger age discrimination laws make social security reforms more effective? Journal of Public Economics, 108, 1-16.
Nikolaev, B.V. (2012). Constitutional and legal principle of equality in the US higher education system. Legislation and law enforcement practice. Moscow: Unity-dana, 175 p.
Okulich, A.I. (2015). Theoretical and legal analysis of the problem of protecting the individual against age discrimination in the implementation of the right to work. Law Issues, 5(53), 165-169.
Raymond, F.G. (2001). Age Discrimination in the American Workplace: Old at a Young Age. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 267 p.
Sargeant, M. (2006). Age discrimination in employment. Aldershot: Gower; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, viii, 233 p.
Shrestha, L.B. & Heisler, E.J. (2011). The Changing Demographic Profile of the United States. CRS Report for Congress. Washington: Congressional Research Service, 36 p.
Taormina-Weiss, W. (2012). The Issue of Ageism in America Today. Disabled World. Direct access: http://www.disabled-world.com/editorials/ageism.php
Vasilieva, Т.А. (2013). To combat discrimination on grounds of age as a necessary part of modern social policy. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1, 191-214.
Yakupov, N.M. (2012). Ageism in Russia. Law and Regulations, 2, 33-35.