(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 10829-10837 | Article Number: ijese.2016.783
Published Online: November 11, 2016
Abstract
he article is devoted to the problem of carrying out distinctions between hostility, dislike and aggression which have a considerable variety of forms of behavior among the population of various typological groups in the conditions of geopolitical changes. Special attention is paid to the questions connected with the peculiarity of approaches and the degree of readiness of this perspective within various scientific traditions. Particulars of representation of concepts are analyzed in the historical and chronological, scientometric and conceptual plan.The qualitative originality of the interpretation of concepts in the approaches of the representatives of the leading scientific schools exerting the impact on modern research of this phenomenon taking into account the changing geopolitical conditions is shown.
Keywords: Geopolitics, psychology, category, aggression, hostility, scientific research, methodological approach
References
Abakumova, I.V., Boguslavskaya, V.F. & Grishina, A.V. (2016a). Ethnoreligious attitudes of contemporary Russian students toward labor migrants as a social group. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(1), 112-120.
Abakumova, I.V., Ermakov, P.N. & Kolesina, K.Y. (2016b). On analyzing the results of empirical research into the life-purpose orientations of adults of various ethnic identities and religious affiliati. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(1), 155-163.
Barefoot, J.C., Beckham, J.C., Haney, T.L., Siegler, I.C. & Lipkus, I.M. (1993). Age differences in hostility among middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8(1), 3-9.
Barefoot, J.C., Patterson, J.C., Haney, T.L., Cayton, T.G., Hickman, J.R., Williams, R.B. (1994). Hostility in asymptomatic men with angiogaphically confirmed coronary artery disease. The American Journal of Cardiology, 74(5), 439-442.
Buss, A.H. (1961). The psychology of aggression. New York: Willey, 307 p.
Chaplin, J.P. (1982). Dictionary of psychology. New York: Dell, 389 p.
Ermakov, P.N., Skirtach, I.A. & Kovsh, E.M. (2015a). Features of Frequency-Spatial Organization of the Cerebral Cortex at Musicians during the Creation of Improvisation Based on Stimulus Material with Aggressive and Peaceful “Characters”. Russian psychological Journal, 12(4), 127-136.
Ermakov, P. & Fedotova O. (2015b). Characteristics of aggression reflection in the psychological educational books of the “Graphic Guide” type. Procedia – Social and behavioral Sciences, 214, 876-881.
Enikolopov, S.N. (2007). Hostility in clinical and criminal psychology. The National Psychological Journal, 1(2), 33-39.
Fedotova, O. (2013). The content of a site of the President of Russia as the information indicator of realization of counter-terrorism strategy in Russia. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 16(3), 392-396.
Fedotova, O. & Chigisheva, O. (2015). Comparative analysis: Methodological optics in the ideological context. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 26, 57-82.
Kovsh, E.M., Skirtach, I.A. & Bunyaeva, M.V. (2015). Psychological Features of Aggressiveness and Hostility of Youth of the South of Russia (on the Example of Russian and Karachay Girls). Russian psychological Journal, 12(4), 8-20.
Kryuchkova, A.S., Ermakov, P.N. & Abakumova, I.V. (2016). The Analysis of the Association of the MAOA Gene Polymorphism with Aggressive and Hostile Behaviour Strategies in Adolescents and Young People. Russian psychological Journal, 13(1), 115-124.
Mikhaylova, S., Husted, K., Minbaeva, D.B. & Pedersen, T. (2012). Knowledge-sharing hostility and governance mechanisms: An empirical test. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 754-773.
Myasishchev, V.N. (1995). Psychology of the relations. Moscow: Institute of practical psychology, 356 p.
Okhmatovskaya, A.V. (2001). Psychological features of hostility at patients with a psychosomatic disease: PhD Abstract. Moscow: Moscow State University, 22 p.
Sadovskaya, A.В. & Enikolopov, S.Н. (2000). Hostility and problem of health of the person. Journal of neurology and psychiatry of Korsakov, 7, 59–64.
Smith, T.W. (1992). Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health psychology, 11, 139-150.
Smith, T.W., Glazer, K., Ruiz, J.M. & Gallo, L.C. (2004a). Hostility, anger, aggressiveness, and coronary heart disease: An interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1217-1270.
Smith, T.W., Uchino, B.N., Bosch, J.A., Kent, R.G. (2014b). Trait hostility is associated with systemic inflammation in married couples: An actor-partner analysis. Biological Psychology, 102, 51-53.
Williams, R.B. (1987). Refining the Type a hypothesis: Emergence of the hostility complex. The American Journal of Cardiology, 60(18), J27-J32.
Williams, R.B. (2003). Invited commentary: Socioeconomic status, hostility, and health behaviors - Does it matter which comes first? American Journal of Epidemiology, 158(8), 743-746.
Williams, R.B., Surwit, R.S., Siegler, I.C., Ashley-Koch, A.E., Collins, A.L., Helms, M.J., Georgiades, A., Boyle, S.H., Brummett, B.H., Barefoot, J.C., Grichnik, K., Stafford-Smith, M., Kuhn, C.M. (2010). Central nervous system serotonin and clustering of hostility, psychosocial, metabolic and cardiovascular endophenotypes in men. Psychosomatic Medicine, 72(7), 601-607.