(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 10751-10759 | Article Number: ijese.2016.777
Published Online: November 11, 2016
Abstract
During The aim of the multi-year study, conducted by the authors of present article, is to reveal the characteristics of social-cultural portrait of 9-16-year-old children, who grow up in the XXI century, along with the influence of modern children’s vision of life on their perception of art. In order to solve the problem, the authors used the results of the survey and testing of two types: questionnaire survey and test tasks in the conditions of an in-depth interview. As a result of the study, the authors revealed three types of mutual influence of axiological orientations of the modern social-cultural environment and aesthetical advantages of art perception. The first stage of child’s art perception actualizes a relative harmony between author’s solution to the work of art and its perception by a recipient. A child perceives an integral content of work and does not contradict its aesthetic essences. In the second type of perception, a child assigns the axiological pathos, therefore narrowing the aesthetic essences of the work but accepting it emotionally. The third type implies the choice of other life values (wealth, career, external beauty), which replace aesthetic essences of the classical art by the mass culture’s criteria. The types of social-cultural environment influence on the art perception of children, who grow up in the XXI century, have been revealed for the first time.
Keywords: aesthetic development, social-cultural environment, perception of art, life values, pedagogics of art
References
Alekseeva, L.L. (2009). Evolutsiya khudozhestvenno-esteticheskogo obrazovaniya na starshey stupeni shkoly. [Evolution of artistic-aesthetic education in high school]. Moskva: Sputnik+.
Bakushinsky, A.B. (2009). Artwork and Upbringing. Moscow: Tot.
Burt, C. (1933). The Psychology of Art. How the mind works. London.
Bychkov, V.V. (2004). Estetika. [Aesthetics]. Moskva: Gardariki.
Child, I.L., and Iwao S. (1977). Young children’s preferential responses to visual art. Scientific Aesthetics1(4), pp. 291–304.
Esteticheskoe mirovospriyatie detey raznykh vozrastnykh grupp: Sbornik statey. [Aesthetic perception of the world by children of different age groups: Collection of articles]. (2007). Moskva: IKHO RAO.
Eysenk, H.J. (1940). The general factor in aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 31, pp. 94–102.
Favorskiy, V.A. (1965). Soderzhanie formy. [Content of shape]. Dekorativnoe iskusstvo, 1, p. 3.
Fomina, N. (2015). Odarennyy rebenok: Problemy khudozhestvenno-tvorcheskogo razvitie. Nauchno-metodicheskoe posobie. [Gifted child: Problems of artistic-creative development. Scientific-methodic handbook]. Moskva: VTSKHT.
Polosukhina, I.A. (2012). Predstavleniya sovremennykh podrostkov o tsennosti khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva (testirovanie 2011 g.). [Modern adolescents’ ideas about the value of artistic creative work (testing of 2011)]. Pedagogika iskusstva, 1. Retrieved from: URL: http://www.art-education.ru/AE-magazine/archive/nomer-1-2012.
Savenkova, L.G. (2011). Didaktika khudozhestvennogo obrazovaniya kak sostavlyayuschaya chast pedagogiki iskusstva: novoe znanie. [Didactics of artistic education as a part of pedagogics of art: new knowledge]. M. IKHO RAO.
Semiotika i iskusstvometriya. Sbornik perevodov. [Semiotics and measuring art. A collection of translations]. (1972). (Combined and edited by Yu.M. Lotman, V.M. Petrov). Moskva: Mir.
Torshilova, E.M. (1988). Mozhno li proverit algebroy garmoniyu (Kriticheskiy ocherk eksperimentalnoy estetiki)? [Is it possible to evaluayte harmony with algebra (Critical essay of experimental aesthetics)? Moskva: Iskusstvo.
Torshilova, E.M. (1993). Kak vosprinimayut esteticheskuyu garmoniyu russkie, amerikanskie i yaposnkie deti. [How aesthetical harmony is perceived by Russian, American and Japanese children]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 14(2).
Torshilova, E.M. (2012). Tendentsii i urovni razvitiya khudozhestvennogo vkusa detey i podrostkov v epokhu sotsiokulturnogo krizisa. [Tendencies and levels of artistic sense of style development in children and adolescents in the period of social-cultural crisis]. M.: IKHO RAO.
Torshilova, E.M. (2014). Monitoring dinamiki tsennostnykh orientatsiy sovremennykh detey i podrostkov. [Monitoring the dynamics of axiological orientations in modern children and adolescents]. Materiály X mezinárodní vědecko-praktická conference «Moderní vymoženosti vědy - 2014». Díl 22. Psychologie a sociologie. Praha: Edukation and Science, 2014.
Torshilova, E.M., Zhbankova (Polosukhina), I.A., Puchkova, N.D. (2011). Ya i Pushkin. Razvitie literaturnogo vkusa sovremennykh detey i podrostkov. [Pushkin and I. Developing literature sense of style in modern children and adolescents]. M.: IKHO RAO.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Psikhologiya iskusstva. [Psychology of art]. Moskva: Iskusstvo.