Preparing Elementary School Teachers to Conduct Diagnostic Testing of the Elementary School Children Development

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Yarullin, Yangirova & Ignatovich, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Yarullin, I.F., Yangirova, V.M. & Ignatovich, V.G. (2016). Preparing Elementary School Teachers to Conduct Diagnostic Testing of the Elementary School Children Development. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(3), 317-326. doi: 10.12973/ijese.2016.317a

Harvard
In-text: (Yarullin, Yangirova and Ignatovich, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Yarullin, I., Yangirova, V. and Ignatovich, V. (2016). Preparing Elementary School Teachers to Conduct Diagnostic Testing of the Elementary School Children Development. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(3), pp. 317-326.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Yarullin, Yangirova and Ignatovich 2016)
Your Bibliography: Yarullin, Ilnar F., Venera M. Yangirova and Viya G. Ignatovich (2016). "Preparing Elementary School Teachers to Conduct Diagnostic Testing of the Elementary School Children Development". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (3):317-326. doi:10.12973/ijese.2016.317a.

Abstract

This article aims to design the theoretical and technological framework for preparing elementary school teachers to conduct diagnostic testing of elementary school children. The key research methods used in this work included testing, expert evaluation; direct, indirect and participant observation; analysing the output of the students', educators' and elementary school children’s activity, the study of best innovative practices, summative and formative experiments which allow to prepare the students to evaluate the development of elementary school children. The article deals with methodological, theoretical and technological aspects of preparing students to evaluate the development of elementary school children; identifies the information, values and tool inventory necessary to prepare the students to conduct diagnostic testing of the development of the elementary school children; defines psychological and pedagogical conditions and experimentally presents the components of such preparedness: intellectual, operational and practical.

Keywords: teachers, children, diagnostic testing, development, learning process, preparedness, interdisciplinary approach

References

Asadullin, R. M. (1999). Advancement of the student’s pedagogic activity in the process of higher education training. Ufa.

Bekhterev, V. M. (1923). The objective study of neuropsychic activity, Moscow, 63.

Bida, О. A. (2003). Theoretical and methodological foundations of the training of future teachers for natural science education in primary school. PhD Thesis. Uman.

Bitinas, B. P. & Kataeva L. I. (1993). Diagnostic testing: Essence, functions, perspectives. Pedagogika, 2.

Bleikher, V. M., Burlachuk, L. F. (1978). Psychological diagnostic testing of the intellect and personality. Vysshaya Shkola, 142.

Blonsky, P. P. (1961). Children’s age-related features. Collected works in pedagogic science. Moscow.

Brundrett, M., Rhodes, C.P. &Gkolia, C. (2006) Planning for leadership succession: creating a talent pool in primary schools.Education, 34 (3), 259-68.

Bruner D., Olver R. & Greenfeld P. (1971). Studies in cognitive growth. Moscow, 392.

Connect: UNESCO International Science, Technology & Environmental Education Newsletter. 1994. T. 19. 1, 3.

Ee training workshops for primary and primary secondary school teachers (ghana)

Gaysina, G. I. ( 2002). Culture-study approach in theory and practice of teacher training. PhD Thesis. Moscow.

Gromova, C. R. & Alimbekov, A. (2015). Egocentrism and Development of Students Identity (On the Example of Studying of Future Teachers). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10 (4), 571-578.

Hadfield, M., Kellow, M. & Day, C. (2002). Schools as learning communities: building capacity through network learning.Education, 2, 19-22.

Kapterev, P.F. & Maltsev, A. (1881). Experience of systematic observation of the children’s development. St.Petersburg, 46.

Khodusov, A. N. (1947). The Development of the teacher’s philosophy. PhD Thesis. Moscow.

Klarin, M. V. (2005). Teaching technologies: Image of an ideal. Shkol’nyye Tekhnologi, 1, 11-20.

Luria, A. R. (1966). Brain mechanisms and the problems of skill development. Sovetskaya Pedagogika, 8, 92 – 93.

Majar, N. E. (1996). Theoretical framework of developing the teacher’s creativity. PhD Thesis. Moscow.

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage.

Pavlov, I. P. (1949). Collected works. V.3. USSR Academy of Sciences.

Ravich–Scherbo, I. V. (1981). Genetic aspects of psychological diagnostics. Psychological diagnostics. Research and issues. Moscow.

Ravkin, Z. I. (1958). Research issues of the world historic and pedagogic process. Sovetskaya Pedagogika, 5, 53-58.

Rubinshtein, S. L. (1958). Of reasoning and its research. Moscow. USSR Academy of Pedagogical Science, 147.

Shatsky, S. T. (1962). Essays in pedagogic science in 4 Volumes. Moscow, 196.

Silyaeva, E. G. (2010). Synergic approach to specialist’s professional philosophy. Pedagogicheskoye Obrazovaniye i Nauka, 8, 35-42.

Slastenin, V. A. & Podymova, L. S. (1997). Pedagogic science: innovative activity. Moscow.

Teplov, B. M. (1961). Problems of individual distinctions. Moscow, RSFSR Academy of Pedagogic Science, 534.

Ushinsky, K. D. (1952). The Human As a Subject of Education. Collected works. Moscow, APS Publishing House.

Sadovaya, V. V., Khakhlova, O. N. & Reznikov, A. A. (2015). The Formation of Professional Readiness of a Social Teacher to Organization of Children’s Leisure Time Activities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10 (4),595-602.

Sharifzyanova, K. Sh., Shtreter, J. N. & Nauryzbayeva, R. N. (2015). Structural-Functional Model of Designing Individual Educational Path of Teacher’s Professional Development in Conditions of Information Educational Environment. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10 (4), 523-532.