(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 10623-10633 | Article Number: ijese.2016.771
Published Online: November 09, 2016
Abstract
The urgency of the stated in the article the problem stems from the fact that in modern conditions when the information has become not only a means of knowledge, the subject of communication but also a means of control, impact on the socio-economic relations, the issues of formation and state regulation of the information space occur. The purpose of the article is to determine the mechanism of legal regulation of information and the creation of structures of information law. On the basis of various scientific approaches category information space is regarded as a universal sphere of information circulation, as a set of objects of information relations and as a system of information relations, which are the subject of special legal regulation. The main object of the study is mechanism of information relations legal regulation, its consistency and specificity. The leading method of this issue investigation is the simulation method which allows to reconstruct a model of social relations legal regulation, chosen by the legislator by examining the reasons that prompted the legislator to take a decision and identify main ideas laid the basis for the legislator legal model. Subjecting the study of the Kazakhstan information legislation, the authors seek to identify inherent in any development of the modern state legal ideas that underlie the regulation of the information space. As a result, the features of the mechanisms in information space legal regulation are revealed, the stages of information legislation development are evaluated. The authors studied different scientific definitions of information, information society, common information space, information resources, information infrastructure, legal and informational relationships and information law. In order to justify the need for the provision of information law the analysis of national legal system was conducted. There was proposed a system of information law.
Keywords: Information law, information rights, legislative regulation of information
References
Ackerman, J.M. & Sandoval-Ballesteros, I.E. (2006). The global explosion of freedom of information laws. Administrative Law Review, 58, 85-130.
Bachilo, I.L., Lopatin, V.N. & Fedotov, M.A. (2001). Information Law. Sankt-Petersburg: Legal Center Press, 789 p.
Bently, L. & Sherman, B. (2014). Intellectual property law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1440 p.
Birkinshaw, P. (2010). Freedom of Information: the Law, the Practice and the Ideal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 578 p.
Bradbury, J., Beaumont, J. & Barlow, T. (2016). An Evolving Landscape: From Information Gatekeeper to Knowledge Professional. Legal Information Management, 16(3), 124-130.
Brent K., McGee, J., McDonald, J. (2015). The Governance of Geoengineering An Emerging Challenge for International and Domestic Legal Systems. Journal of Law, Information and Science, 24(1), 1-33.
Coppel, P. (2014). Information rights: Law and practice. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 342 p.
Cornish, W., Llewelyn, G.I. & Aplin, T. (2013). Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1008 p.
Dahiyat, E.A. (2016). The legal recognition of online brokerage in UAE: is a conceptual rethink imperative? Information and Communications Technology Law, 25(2), 173-189.
Dietz, T. (2014). Global Order Beyond Law: How Information and Communication Technologies Facilitate Relational Contracting in International Trade. London: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, 270 p.
Ehrett, J.S. (2016). E-judiciaries: a model for community policing in cyberspace. Information and Communications Technology Law, 25(3), 272-291.
Gorodov, O.A. (2009). Information Law. Moscow: Prospect, 454 p.
Isaac-Henry, K. & Barnes, С. (2000). Information and Communication Technologies: Assessing Public Attitude and Local Government Resolve. Public Policy and Administration, 15(3), 20-31.
Ivanets, G.I. & Chervonyuk, V.I. (2003). Globalization. State. Law. State and Law, 8, 87-94.
Kobersy, I.S., Karyagina, A.V., Karyagina, O.V. & Shkurkin, D. (2015). Law as a social regulator of advertisement and advertising activity in the modern Russian information space. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 9-18.
Leoni, B. (2012). Freedom and the Law. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 420 p.
Lloyd, I. (2014). Information Technology Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 600 p.
Mendel, T. (2003). Freedom of information as an internationally protected human right. Comparative Media Law Journal, 1(1), 39-70.
Pollitt, C. (2011). Mainstreaming Technological Change in the Study of Public Management. Public Policy and Administration, 26(4), 377-397.
Rassolov, I.M. (2010). Information Law. Moscow: Lawyer, 72 p.
Roberts, A.S. (2000). Less government, more secrecy: Reinvention and the weakening of freedom of information law. Public Administration Review, 60(4), 308-320.
Sharma, A. (2013). State Transparency after the Neoliberal Turn: The Politics, Limits, and Paradoxes of India's Right to Information Law. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 36(2), 308-325.
Sokolova, S.N. & Seniv, J.M. (2013). Information Law and State Regulation of Information Security. Information Law, 2(33), 3-7.
Spahiu, I. (2015). Between the right to know and the right to forget: looking beyond the Google case. European Journal of Law and Technology, 6(2), 1-25.
Ward, J. (1986). The Impact of Freedom of Information Legislation on Senior Civil Servants. Public Policy and Administration, 1(3), 11-19.