Published Issues

Volume 14 (2019)
Volume 14 Issue 9

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 8

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 7

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 6

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 5

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 4

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 3

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 2

(2019)
Volume 14 Issue 1

(2019)
Volume 13 (2018)
Volume 13 Issue 10

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 9

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 8

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 7

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 6

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 5

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 4

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 3

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 2

(2018)
Volume 13 Issue 1

(2018)
Volume 12 (2017)
Volume 12 Issue 10

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 9

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 8

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 7

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 6

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 5

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 4

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 3

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 2

(2017)
Volume 12 Issue 1

(2017)
Volume 11 (2016)
Volume 11 Issue 18

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 17

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 16

Special Issue - (2016)
Volume 11 Issue 15

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 14

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 13

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 12

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 11

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 10

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 9

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 8

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 7

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 6

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 5

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 4

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 3

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 2

(2016)
Volume 11 Issue 1

(2016)
Volume 10 (2015)
Volume 10 Issue 6

(2015)
Volume 10 Issue 5

(2015)
Volume 10 Issue 4

Special Issue - (2015)
Volume 10 Issue 3

(2015)
Volume 10 Issue 2

(2015)
Volume 10 Issue 1

(2015)
Volume 9 (2014)
Volume 9 Issue 4

(2014)
Volume 9 Issue 3

(2014)
Volume 9 Issue 2

(2014)
Volume 9 Issue 1

(2014)
Volume 8 (2013)
Volume 8 Issue 4

(2013)
Volume 8 Issue 3

(2013)
Volume 8 Issue 2

(2013)
Volume 8 Issue 1

(2013)
Volume 7 (2012)
Volume 7 Issue 4

(2012)
Volume 7 Issue 3

(2012)
Volume 7 Issue 2

(2012)
Volume 7 Issue 1

Special Issue - (2012)
Volume 6 (2011)
Volume 6 Issue 4

(2011)
Volume 6 Issue 3

(2011)
Volume 6 Issue 2

(2011)
Volume 6 Issue 1

(2011)
Volume 5 (2010)
Volume 5 Issue 4

(2010)
Volume 5 Issue 3

(2010)
Volume 5 Issue 2

(2010)
Volume 5 Issue 1

(2010)
Volume 4 (2009)
Volume 4 Issue 4

(2009)
Volume 4 Issue 3

(2009)
Volume 4 Issue 2

(2009)
Volume 4 Issue 1

(2009)
Volume 3 (2008)
Volume 3 Issue 4

(2008)
Volume 3 Issue 3

(2008)
Volume 3 Issue 2

(2008)
Volume 3 Issue 1

(2008)
Volume 2 (2007)
Volume 2 Issue 4

(2007)
Volume 2 Issue 3

(2007)
Volume 2 Issue 2

(2007)
Volume 2 Issue 1

(2007)
Volume 1 (2006)
Volume 1 Issue 2

(2006)
Volume 1 Issue 1

(2006)

Volume 9 Issue 2 (2014)

Modeling the Relationship between High School Students’ Chemistry Self-efficacy and Metacognitive Awareness

Zubeyde Demet Kirbulut

pp. 177-196   |  Article Number: ijese.2014.010
Published Online: April 10, 2014

Full text PDF Citation
APA 6th edition
In-text: (Kirbulut, 2014)
Your Bibliography: Kirbulut, Z.D. (2014). Modeling the Relationship between High School Students’ Chemistry Self-efficacy and Metacognitive Awareness . International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(2), 177-196.
Harvard
In-text: (Kirbulut, 2014)
Your Bibliography: Kirbulut, Z. (2014). Modeling the Relationship between High School Students’ Chemistry Self-efficacy and Metacognitive Awareness . International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(2), pp. 177-196.
Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Kirbulut 2014)
Your Bibliography: Kirbulut, Zubeyde Demet (2014). "Modeling the Relationship between High School Students’ Chemistry Self-efficacy and Metacognitive Awareness ". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 9 (2):177-196.

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between students’ chemistry self-efficacy beliefs and metacognitive awareness was investigated utilizing a path model. There were 268 chemistry high school students (59% 10th grade and 41% 11th grade) participated in the study. The students took two-hour chemistry course in the 9th and 10th grade and three-hour chemistry course in the 11th grade. To measure students’ self-efficacy toward chemistry, the High School Chemistry Self-efficacy Scale was used. Students’ metacognition was assessed via Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. The hypothesized model for the relationship between high school students’ chemistry selfefficacy and metacognitive awareness was tested by conducting confirmatory factor analysis by using LISREL 9.1 for Windows with SIMPLIS command language. The results of this study showed that high efficacious students were more aware of knowledge about their cognitive abilities and their regulation of cognitive processes.

Keywords: metacognition; self-efficacy; path model; chemistry

References