(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 10413-10422 | Article Number: ijese.2016.753
Published Online: November 09, 2016
Abstract
Interest to axiosphere as the sphere of values and its correlation with the ever-progressive noosphere as sphere of knowledge of a person is due to comprehension of the modern period in the evolution of society. The aim of the article is to describe an axiological aspect of the research of identity as an element of human and language universes. The material of research is made by the term identity and the ways of its representation in Russian and French (nouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives). For achievement of a goal of research, we use the cognitive, discursive and semantic approaches to the studying of the axiological aspect of the identity. The article deals with the modern linguistic axiological analysis and offers a detailed account of ‘ethnosemimetry’ as one of its possible implementations. The work specifies the principles and contexts of the method employment and features an axiological analysis of the lexeme “identity’ in the French and Russian languages. The term identity is in the spotlight of the modern anthropocentric vector of research. It is recommended that interdisciplinary development of research of identity should include complex methods of analysis of the identity as an element of human and language universes.
Keywords: Identity, human and language universes, linguistic axiological analysis, ethnosemimetry
References
Augé, M. (1992). Non-Lieux: Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 158 p.
Barreto, A. (2004). Exclusions et maladies d'âme. Paris: Éditions UNESCO, 545 p.
Charaudeau, P. (2002). Identité. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 385 p.
Dictionary of Foreign Words. (1988). Мoscow: The Russian Language, 608 p.
Dictionnaire de l’altérité et des relations culturelles (2010). Paris: Armand Colin, 354 p.
Dictionnaire historique de la langue française. (2006). Paris: Robert, 4304 p.
Drapeau Contim, F. (2010). Qu’est-ce que l’identité? Paris: LIBRAIRIE PHILOSOPHIQUE, 128 p.
Kulagina, О.А. (2012). Language Portrait of a Stranger as a Way of Representing Ethno-Cultural Dissonance in French. Мoscow: MCU, 201 p.
Linguistics and Axiology: Ethnosemimetry of Evaluative Meanings (2011). Moscow: THESAURUS, 352 p.
Mikhailova, S.V. (2012). Feminine Identity and the Means of its Objectification in the French Literature of the XVII Century. Moscow: MCU, 249 p.
Noiriel, G. (2007). À quoi sert «l'identité nationale». Marseille: Agone, 154 p.
Portella, E. (2004). La culture au XXIe siècle: clonage ou métissage? Paris: Éditions UNESCO, 321-327.
Ricoeur, P. (2008). Self as Another. Moscow: Humanitarian Literature Publishing House, 416 p.
Serebrennikova, E.F. (2008). Semimetry of the Word "Strange" within the Comparative Cultural Aspect of the Analysis. Irkutsk: ISLU, 558 p.
Shayegan, D. (2004). Une «schizophrénie apprivoisée»? Paris: Éditions UNESCO, 227 p.
Shevlyakova, D.А. (2011). Dominant Features of National Identity of the Italians. Мoscow: University book, 496 p.
Skrelina, L.М. (2009). Guillaume's school: psychological systematics. Мoscow: The higher school, 367 p.
Trunov, D.G. (2011). Phenomenology of Self-Cognition: Regions of Self-Existence. Perm: PSU, 318 p.
Vikulova, L.G. & Kulagina, O.A. (2013). National İdentity in the Context of Otherness: Language Representation of the Oppositions "Personal – Others'" in the French Literature of the 20th Century. MCPU Bulletin. Vol. "Philology. Theory of Language. Language Education", 2(12), 33-42.
Vikulova, L.G. & Serebrennikova, E.F. (2014). Structures of Modeling of Valuable Reference Points of a Social Reality Discourse in Mass Media Communicative Space. MCPU Bulletin. Vol. "Philology. Theory of Language. Language Education", 2(14), 55–63.
Zheltukhina, M.R. (2014a). Interkulturelle semantische und pragmatische Parallelen im modernen Mediendiskurs: der funktionale Aspekt. Interkulturalität unter dem Blickwinkel von Semantik und Pragmatik. Csaba Földes. Beiträge zur interkulturellen Germanistik. Tübingen: Narr, 257-275 p.
Zheltukhina, M.R. (2014b). Modern Media İnfluence: Human İdentity Manipulation. Moscow: Academia, 237 p.
Zheltukhina, M.R. (2015). Institutional, Stereotypical and Mythological Media Markers of Modern Society. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, 12(1), 913-920.
Zheltukhina, M.R., Krasavsky, N.A., Slyshkin, G.G. & Ponomarenko, E.B. (2016a). Utilitarian and Aesthetic Values in the Modern German Society (Through the Example of Print Media Advertisements). IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1411-1418.
Zheltukhina, M.R., Vikulova, L.G., Slyshkin, G.G. & Vasileva, E.G. (2016b). Naming as Instrument of Strengthening of the Dynastic Power in the Early Middle Ages (France, England, Vth–XIth Centuries). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 7195-7205.
Zheltukhina, M.R., Zinkovskaya, A.V., Katermina, V.V. & Shershneva, N.B. (2016c). Dialogue as a Constıtuent Resource for Dramatıc Dıscourse: Language, Person And Culture. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15), 7408-7420.