(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 207-215 | DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.304a | Article Number: ijese.2016.045
Published Online: March 10, 2016
Abstract
The paper establishes that the change of an educational paradigm cannot be realized without developing a new view on teachers’ mission, their social and professional status, and, in particular, on the process of vocational training in general. Main problems of modern teachers’ training and the purpose of pedagogical education at the present stage are singled out in the paper; guidelines of pedagogical education modernization in Russia are updated. The paper reveals essential characteristics of a competence- and activity-based approach in the context of modern teachers’ training. The authors provide the analysis of master programs in Kazan Federal University applied for the training direction "Pedagogical education"; identify problems of content and organizational character in this context; highlight advantages and possible risks of a new organizational structure of Master in Pedagogy within a federal university; submit a substantial characteristic of Master’s degree programs for training subject teachers, variable trajectories of receiving pedagogical education, forms of educational results presentations. The paper is addressed to administrative and academic teaching staff of higher educational institutions realizing Master’s degree programs for the direction “Pedagogical education” and interested in their further modernization.
Keywords: Aydar M. Kalimullin, Vera K. Vlasova & Regina G. Sakhieva
References
Ananyev, B. G. (1977). About problems of modern human study. Moscow: Science.
Bolotov, V. A. (2013). Considerations on the reform of pedagogical education. Professional Education. Stolitza, 10, 6-10.
Bulin-Sokolova, E. I., Obukhova, A. S. & Semenova, A. L. (2014). Future pedagogical education. Direction of movement and first practical steps. Psychological Science and Education, 19(3), 207-226.
Gafurov, I. R. (2013). Pedagogical education at Kazan Federal University. Universum: Bulletin of Gertsen university, 2, 19-24.
Gilmanshina, S. I. & Vilkeev, D. V. (2004). Professional thinking of the teacher: scientific and pedagogical aspect.Psychological Science and Education, 2, 67-75.
Kalimullin, A. M. (2014). Improvement of teachers' qualification at Kazan Federal University. World Applied Sciences Journal, 30 (4), 447-450.
Kalimullin, A. M. (2014). Processes of reforming teacher training in modern Russia (experience of Kazan Federal University). American Journal of Applied Sciences, 11 (8), 1365-1368.
Kuzmina N. V., Rean A. A. (1993). Professionalism of pedagogical activity. St. Petersburg: Education.
Leontyev, A. N. (1975). Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Politizdat.
Margolis, A. A. (2014). Problems and prospects of pedagogical education development in the Russian Federation.Psychological Science and Education, 19 (3), 54-55.
Margolis, A. A. (2014). Requirements to BVEP modernization of teachers’ training according to the Professional Standard for the teacher: proposals on activity-based approach realization in teachers training. Psychological Sciences and Education, 19 (3), 120-121.
Piskunov, A. I. (2001). Pedagogical education: concept, contents, structure. Pedagogics, 3, 41-47.
Rubenstein, S. L. (2000). Fundamentals of general psychology. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg: Publishing house “Peter”.
Sharifzyanova, K. Sh., Shtreter, J. N. & Nauryzbayeva, R. N. (2015). Structural-Functional Model of Designing Individual Educational Path of Teacher’s Professional Development in Conditions of Information Educational Environment. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(4), 523-532.
Savenkov, A. I., Lvova, A. S., Vachkova, S. N., Lyubchenko, O. A. & Nikitina, E. K. (2014). A new generation of Master’s course for teachers. Pedagogical Science and Education, 19 (3), 197-206.
Sidorkin, A. M. Public pedagogical practice in teachers’ training (2014). Psychological Science and Education, 19 (3), 74-77.
Slastenin, V. A. (2000). Pedagogical process as a system. Moscow: MAGISTR-PRESS.
Talanchuk, H. M. (1996). New content of teachers’ general pedagogical preparation: system-synergetic theory. Kazan: Magarif.
The analytical statement about the course of pedagogical education modernization project implementation in the Russian Federation. MSPPU, SRI HSE, Moscow, 2015, http://pedagogical obrazovaniye.rf/news/show/105.
The Professional Standard “Teacher” (pedagogical activity in preschool, primary general, main general, secondary education (a tutor, a teacher).URL http://profstandart .rosmintrud.ru/web/ps235135.
Valeeva, R. A. (2013) Requirements to the teacher’s personality as a tutor in the context of humanistic pedagogics of the XX century. Issues of Education, 2, 80-88.
Vesmanov, S. V., Vesmanov, D. S., Zhadko, N. V. & Akopyan, G. A. (2014). Training of teachers in a research magistracy: experience of Moscow City Pedagogical University. Psychological Science and Education, 19 (3), 160-167.
Vilkeev, D. V. (1992). Formation of students’ pedagogical thinking: Study guide for students of teachers’ training colleges. Kazan: Magarif.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1991). Pedagogical psychology. Moscow: Science.
Zimnyay, I. A. (2004). Key competences as a resultative-goal foundation for a competence-based approach in education. Author's version. Moscow: Research center for quality specialists’ training.