(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 181-188 | Article Number: ijese.2016.744
Published Online: November 10, 2016
Abstract
The goal of this research is to investigate whether there is a significant difference between constructivist approaches based instruction (CABI) and traditionally designed science instruction on Preservice Teacher 3rd grade students’ understanding of concept with the “Electric” unit and attitudes toward science. Two classes, each with 60 students were randomly selected. The experimental group was instructed though CABI strategies, whereas the control group was utilized with traditional methods. The measurement instruments utilized were Physics Achievement Test. As a result of this study it was found out that CAB, when compared to the traditional learning method, created positive effects on students’ success science as a school subject.
Keywords: Enhancing, Learning, Constructivist Approach, Science Education
References