Education Reform at the Science University and the New Strategy for Training Science Teachers

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Gabdulchakov, Kusainov & Kalimullin, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Gabdulchakov, V.F., Kusainov, A.K. & Kalimullin, A.M. (2016). Education Reform at the Science University and the New Strategy for Training Science Teachers . International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(3), 163-172. doi: 10.12973/ijese.2016.300a

Harvard
In-text: (Gabdulchakov, Kusainov and Kalimullin, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Gabdulchakov, V., Kusainov, A. and Kalimullin, A. (2016). Education Reform at the Science University and the New Strategy for Training Science Teachers . International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(3), pp. 163-172.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Gabdulchakov, Kusainov and Kalimullin 2016)
Your Bibliography: Gabdulchakov, Valerian F., Askarbek K. Kusainov and Aydar M. Kalimullin (2016). "Education Reform at the Science University and the New Strategy for Training Science Teachers ". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (3):163-172. doi:10.12973/ijese.2016.300a.

Abstract

The urgency of the problem of designing a new strategy of teacher training due to the reform of education in universities: decrease of pedagogical disciplines, strengthening fundamental (subject) training, etc. The goal of the article lies in identification of the main components of the new strategy of teacher training. A leading approach to the study of this problem was personological. The result was a new model of teacher training. Undergraduate students are deepening their knowledge of the core subjects (be it Mathematics and Physics or Chemistry and Biology), while graduate students are making a choice: whether to be an engineer, researcher, scientist (which means keep deepening one’s knowledge) or be a teacher (which means master psychology, pedagogics, and the methodology of teaching a chosen discipline). The new approach has helped identify the indicators and determinants of pedagogical craftsmanship. The results of the study can be useful in designing new strategies for training teachers

Keywords: education reform at the University, teacher training, personal developmental model, indicators of pedagogical skill of the teacher

References

Belyakova, Ye. G. (2009). Meaning-Making in Pedagogical Interaction. PhD thesis, Tyumen.

Feldstein, D. I. (2011). A Link between Theory and Practice in Forming the Psychological-Pedagogical Foundations of the Organization of Modern Education. VoprosyVospitaniya, 2, 18-20.

Gabdulchakov, V. F. (2011a). Of Linguistic Education in Kindergartens. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(2),185-188.

Gabdulchakov, V. F. (2011b). Technology of Formation of an Individual Image of Speech Behaviour. The collection: Scientific Potential of the World. Przemysl, 72-74.

Gabdulchakov, V. F. (2011c). The Developing Approach to Training in the Conditions of Polycultural Language Formation.The collection: Scientific Potential of the World. Przemysl, 50-51.

Gabdulhakov, V. F. (2013a). Design of Technology of Personification. Modern Scientific Achievements: materials of the international scientifically-practical conference. Dil 35 Pedagogika.Prague, 85-87.

Gabdulhakov, V. F. (2013b). Indicators of Professional Skill of the Teacher in the Context of Determinants of Gifted and Deviation. Modern Scientific Achievements: materials of the international scientifically-practical conference. Dil 35 Pedagogika. Prague, 68-71.

Gabdulhakov, V. F. (2013c). Tutor as a Technology for the Development of Creativity. Modern Scientific Achievements: materials of the international scientifically-practical conference. Dil 35 Pedagogika. Prague, 83-85.

Korneyeva, L. I. (2004). The Making of Professional Learning and Career Enhancement in Germany: A Logical-Historical Analysis. Obrazovaniye i Nauka, 3, 53-60.

Matyushkina, M. D. (2013). A Prospective Assessment of the Quality of Post-Diploma Pedagogical Education. PhD thesis, Saint Petersburg, 43-45.

McClelland, D. C. (2003). Illustrator 10: The Complete Guide. Saint Petersburg: DiaSoftYuP, 848.

Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in Personality, N.Y., 34-45.

Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test: Manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 3-7.

Murray, H. A. (1951). Toward a Classification of Interaction. In Toward a General Theory of Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 23-34.

Murray, H. A. (1994). Thematic Apperception Test: Manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 34-45.

Petrovsky, V. A. (2002). The Idea of Free Causality in the Psychology of Personality.In The Psychology of Personality in the Works of National Psychologists. Saint Petersburg: Piter (Seriya “Khrestomatiyapo Psikhologii”), 436-448.

Petrovsky, V. A. (2007). Individuality and Self- Regulation: The Experience of Multi-Subject Theory. Moscow. www.bim-bad.ru/biblioteka/article_full.php?aid=500&binn_rubrik_ pl_articles=173

Rostovtseva, V. M. (2005). Diversification as a Condition for the Preparation of Higher Education Pedagogical Human Resources by Means of Language Education. PhD thesis, Saint Petersburg, 425-427.

Sleeter, C. E. (1996). Multicultural Education as Social Activism. State University of New York Press, 337.

Sorokopud, Yu. V. (2012). The Development of a System of Preparation of College Instructors. Doctor of Education thesis abstract, Moscow, 44-45.