(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 10289-10300 | Article Number: ijese.2016.738
Published Online: November 01, 2016
Abstract
This article deals with the problem of students’ giftedness development. Students’ test results (n=851) for "IQ level" and "creativity level" indicators demonstrated the need to improve the quality of work in reference to students’ professional giftedness development at the university. Designed complex of pedagogical conditions involves students’ giftedness development on organizational-pedagogical, psycho-pedagogical and didactic levels. Results can be used in educational practice of higher educational institutions of any type as methodological recommendations in work organization with gifted students, as well as in specialists training.
Keywords: Giftedness diagnosis, students’ technical training, IQ level, psycho-pedagogical training conditions, the Republic of Kazakhstan
References
Baas, D., Castelijns, J., Vermeulen, M., Martens, R., & Segers, M. (2015). The relation between Assessment for Learning and elementary students' cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 33–46.
Dal Forno, L., Bahia, S., & Veiga, F. (2015). Gifted amongst Preschool Children: An Analysis on How Teachers Recognize Giftedness. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education, 5, 707–715.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (2005). IQ tests. Astrel Publishing house.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1987). Personality and individual differences. Plenum.
Fugelova, T. A. (2013). Professional mobility of students of a technical college as a social and pedagogical problem. Journal of Man and Education, 3(36), 83–86.
Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley
Hannafin, M. J. (2012). Student-centered learning. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 3211–3214). Springer US.
Ivanenko, N. A., Khairova, I. V., Fajzrakhmanova, A. L., Khalilova, T. V., Kharisova, G. M., Lisitzina, T. B., & Shaimukhametova, S. F. (2015). Competitiveness of professional education: Purposes, tasks and factors of its participation in the international educational services market. Asian Social Science, 11(1), 369.
Kalimullin, A. M., & Masalimova, A. R. (2016). Editorial: Actual issues of national education: Theory and practice. IEJME-Mathematics Education.
Karadağ, F., Karabey, B., & Pfeiffer, S. (2016). Identifying Gifted Preschoolers in Turkey: The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish-Translated Version of the GRS-Preschool/Kindergarten Form. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(10), 8–16.
Kwiek, M. (2014). Structural changes in the Polish higher education system (1990–2010): a synthetic view. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 266–280.
Lebedeva, Ya. P. (2004). Mathematical models as an educational means. Pedagogy, 2, 11–19.
Lyusin, D. V., Ushakov, D. V. (Ed.) (2004). Social Intelligence: Theory, measurement, research. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 176.
Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., Salovey, P. (1999). Emotional Intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267–298.
Peyre, H., Ramus, F., Melchior, M., Forhan, A., Heude, B., Gauvrit, N., & EDEN Mother-Child Cohort Study Group. (2016). Emotional, behavioral and social difficulties among high-IQ children during the preschool period: Results of the EDEN mother–child cohort. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 366–371.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 119–130.
Reis, S., & McCoach, D. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170.
Ren, N., Guo, J., & Pan, F. (2013). College students' part-time working experience and the competitiveness in the labor market using Beijing Normal University as an example. Money China, 15, 266–268.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davison (Eds.). Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 361–368.
Sternberg, P., Forsyth, J., Hadland, J., Horvard, J. A., Wagner, R. K., Williams, V. M., Snook, S. A., Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Practical intelligence. St. Petersburg: "Peter" Publishing House.
Stimac, H., & Simic, M. L. (2012). Competitiveness in higher education: A need for marketing orientation and service quality. Economics & Sociology, 5(2), 23.
The concept of identification, development and support of gifted children in the Republic of Kazakhstan (1999). Methodology collection, 3, 3–24. Almaty: Republican Scientific and Practical Center "Daryn".
Tunick, E. E. (2013). The best tests on creativity. Diagnosis of creative thinking. St. Petersburg: "Peter" Publishing House.