(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 10229-10240 | Article Number: ijese.2016.733
Published Online: November 01, 2016
Abstract
An important issue in the development of transitional societies at the present stage of historical development is the impact of "global democracy" system of government. Trends of such influence in the post-Soviet space, in particular, are becoming more tangible in the context of globalization and especially after the so-called "color revolutions" that took place in Georgia, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan and which, of course, led to violation of the existing social-political balance. The main problem that arises due to associated with the fact that global democracy is now replaced by the Americanization. On this basis there are no guarantees that the system of democratic values, which polarized American society, and could be a priority within the global community. Issues examined on the basis of the democratic potential of Kazakhstan. To ensure the democratization of the state governance system in Kazakhstan, it is expedient to establish clear rules of fairness, such as the creation by citizens, civil society, the exclusion of the state from the private sphere of interests, ensure the rule of law, civil initiatives and human rights. These are the main criteria by which developing Western civilization, and they may be adapted to the realities of the development of any type of society, especially Kazakh.
Keywords: Global democratization; politics of Kazakhstan; modernization of the state; democratic society; the system of social values
References
Ahmetova, K. S. (2014). Collective appeals (petitions) and national law-making initiative in democracy system in Kazakhstan and Russia. Constitutional and municipal law, 6, 37-42.
Belispaev, A. M. (2010). Power decentralization Institutes. Perm University bulletin, 3, 45-50, Jurisprudence Series.
Bhuiyan, S. H. (2010). E-Government in Kazakhstan: Challenges and Its Role to Development. Public Organization Review, 10, 31-47.
Bossuyt, F., & Kubicek, P. (2015). Favouring Leaders over Laggards: Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. The Substance of EU Democracy Promotion: Concepts and Cases, edited by A. Wetzel & J. Orbie, 177-192. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brudney, J. L., & Nezhina, T. G. (2005). What is Old is New Again: Achieving Effectiveness with Volunteer Programs in Kazakhstan. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 16, 293-308.
Bukikkio, D., Bljer, T., & Krol, D. (2015). Kazakhstan trend: from totalitarianism to democracy and the rule of law (by sight). Law and the state, 3 (68), 12-15.
De Vries, M. S., & Sobis, I. (2014). Reluctant Reforms: The Case of Kazakhstan. Public Organization Review, 14, 139-157.
Evseev, V. V. (2013). Authoritarianism in Central Asia (for example, Kazakhstan). Moscow State Institute of International Relations bulletin, 5(32), 101-107.
Fawn, R. (2013). The Kazakhstan Chairmanship of the OSCE: Internal Conditionality and the Risks of Political Appeasement. In International Organizations and Internal Conditionality: Making Norms Matter, 195-230. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hasanov, M. S., & Petrova, V. F. (2015). Genesis and development of democracy in Kazakhstan. Collection of: Priorities of world science: experiment and scientific discussion. Materials of the 9 International Scientific Conference, 157-161
Kudrjashova, J. A. (2014). Features of the political system formation in the Republic of Kazakhstan (end of XX – beginning XXI centuries). Caspian region: politics, economy, culture, 4(41), 118-126.
Matveev, Y.V., Valieva, E.N., Trubetskayam O.V., Kislovm A.G. (2016). Globalization and Regionalization: Institution Aspect. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(8), 3114-3126.
Muhamedzhanov, J. B. (2011). Kazakhstan: a step towards European democracy? Modern Europe, 2(46), 26-36.
Muradjan, V. (2010). Kazakhstan as a "partner for democracy stabilization". Central Asia and the Caucasus, 13(2), 173-179.
Narbaev, B. N., & Zhaksybekov, A. S. (2013). Open Society in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Natural humanities research, 2, 123-128.
Nowicki, M. E. (2000). Kazakhstan's Nonprofit Sector at a Crossroad on the Great Silk Road. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 11, 217-235.
Nurligenova, Z. N., Nygmetova, N. T., & Zhienbaev, M. B. (2015). Democracy in Kazakhstan: from the beginnings to the present day. Collection of The Seventh International Conference on Eurasian scientific development Proceedings of the Conference, 146-150.
Nurmakov, A. (2016). Kazakhstan and the Global Industry of Mega Events: A Case of Autocratic Management. Mega Events in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Shifting Borderlines of Inclusion and Exclusion, edited by A. Makarychev & A. Yatsyk, 99-129. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ospanov, K. I. (2012). Some aspects of the initial phase of the development of democracy in modern Kazakhstan. Kyrgyz Russian Slavic University bulletin, 12(12), 110-113.
Sordi, A. D. (2016). Legitimation and the Party of Power in Kazakhstan. Politics and Legitimacy in Post-Soviet Eurasia, edited by M. Brusis, J. Ahrens, & M. S. Wessel, 72-96. London: Palgrave Macmillan.