(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 10185-10196 | Article Number: ijese.2016.730
Published Online: November 01, 2016
Abstract
In contemporary literary studies one can clearly observe the process of different interpretation of former approaches to literary works and artistic legacy of some outstanding authors. The attention of scientists is focused on such categories that can contribute to the reconstruction of a complete picture of the writing career of an individual author or a specific period in the literary development of the country. One of these categories is an artistic thinking. Analysis of the artistic thinking allows us to study the works of the poet as a living dynamic system, paying attention to both the specific elements and their relationships. By selecting the concept “artistic thinking” out of other synonyms and categorizing it, we show absolutely different possibilities for the analysis of such difficult to interpret phenomena as cognitive processes and their reflection in pieces of writing. Such processes can’t be found in rationally oriented epic genres. We offer a kind of “matrix” of studying systematic artistic thinking that can be applied in the analysis of poetic worlds of different authors. This approach is seen to be productive and is recommended to be used by other literary critics as a possible way to get objective results while studying lyrics and lyrical systems.
Keywords: Artistic thinking, poetic world, figurative-semantic categories, lyrics, systemic relations
References
Bahtin, M.M. (1975). Forms of time and chronotope in the novel: Essays on the historical poetics. Bahtin, M.M., (Ed.). Issues of literature and aesthetics. Studies over the years. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya Literatura, 235 p.
Belinskiy, V.G. (1953-1959). Complete set of works in 13 volumes. Moscow: Nauka, VII, 307.
Blanchot, M. (2015). The space of literature. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
Chudakov, A.P. (1986). Chekhov's world: The emergence and adoption. Moscow: Prosveshenie, 3 p.
Curtius, E.R. (2013). European literature and the Latin middle ages. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
de Chardin, P.T. (2015). The phenomenon of man. North Carolina: Lulu Press, Inc, 336 p.
Eco, Umberto. (1995). Sei passeggiate nei boschi narrativi. Milano: Bompiani, 73 p.
Fedorenko, N. (1985). Idea and image. Moscow: Nauka, 180 p.
Fedorov, F.P. (1988). Romantic artistic world: space and time. Riga: Zinatne, 9 p.
Gaspsarov, M., & Scheglov’s, Yu.K. (1995). Image of “wind” in the poetics of Anna Akhmatovam Issues of literature, 3, 138 p.
Grabec, I., & Sachse, W. (2012). Synergetics of measurement, prediction and control. Springer Science & Business Media, 68 p.
Hegel, G.W.F. (2012). The phenomenology of mind. New York: Courier Corporation, 481 p.
Kagan, M.S. (1979). Classification and systematization. Types in culture, 6-11 pp. Systemacity and integrity. http://www.ligis.ru/psylib/090417/books/_kagam01.htm.
Lavlinskiy, S.P., & Gurovich, N.M. (2008). Visual in the literature. Glossary of terms and concepts. Moscow: Intrada, 37 p.
Leiderman, N.L. (2004). Ideas of systems in the Russian literary of the twentieth century. Russian literature of the XX-XXI centuries: the directions and trends, 7, 15. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University.
Likhachev, D.S. (1968). The inner world of a piece of art. Issues of Literature, 8, 76 p.
Lomonosov, M.V. (1952). A brief guide to eloquence. Complete set of works Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 7, 241 p.
Lotman, Yu.M. (1988). School of the poetic word. Pushkin. Lermontov. Gogol. Moscow: Prosveshenie, 293 p.
Mamardashvili, M.K., Pyatigirskiy, A.M., & Simvol, I. (Eds.). (1997). We should take into account that these philosophers use the concept “consciousness” without linking it with the artistic world. Consciousness. Metaphysical reasoning about consciousness, symbolism and language (pp. 67-85). Moscow: LRC Publishing House.
Mikeshina, L.A. (2006). Philosophy of science: Epistemology. Methodology. Culture. Moscow: International University in Moscow Publishing House, 79 p.
Neupokoeva, I.G. (1976). History of World Literature. Problems of systematic and comparative analysis. Moscow: Nauka, 359 p.
Potebnya, A.A. (1905). Notes on the theory of literature. Kharkov:Pechatnoe Delo, 582 p.
Tleuova, A.Z., Baltymova, M.R., Niyazova, G.M., Tektigul, Zh.O., & Toxanbayeva, T.Zh. (2016). The World of Fantasy and the Trends in Modern Kazakh Fantastic Literature. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1591-1605.
Zamanskaya, V.V. (2002). Existential tradition in Russian literature of the twentieth century. Dialogues on the borders of the century: Textbook. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka, 17 p.