The research consists in studying the level of population's trust in nasleg administration (in the administrative-territorial unit) of MS "Khatyryksky nasleg" of Namsky ulus using the case study. The leading research methods for the problem are empirical methods that allow revealing the level of population's trust in administration. The population of Khatyryksky nasleg is satisfied with the quality of state services provided by the nasleg administration. The index of the nasleg administration is higher than that of the ulus administration, although both values exceed the high population trust index mark. The population's satisfaction with the activity of local government agencies is an index by which the efficiency of activity of the local self-government agencies can be determined in the sphere of municipal administration organization. This index characterizes the extent of the population's satisfaction with the activity of the local self-government agencies and its level of trust in government. It has been revealed that the population of MS "Khatyryksky nasleg" of Namsky ulus is not frank enough in expressing their opinion about the authorities. This research will allow administration  enhancing the efficiency of using the tools for implementation of social and economic strategies and municipal structures development programs which influence the welfare and quality of life of the population.

Autonomous Nonprofit Organization Analytical Center of Yuri Levada (ANO Levada Center) (2016). Direct access: http://www.levada.ru/

Bijlsma-Frankema, K. & Costa, A.C. (2005). Understanding the Trust-Control Nexus. International Sociology, 20, 259-282.

Buyukcan-Tetik, A., Finkenauer, C., Siersema, M., Vander H,K. & Krabbendam, L. (2015). Social Relations Model Analyses of Perceived Self-Control and Trust in Families. Journal of Marriage & Family, 77, 209-223.

Elgar, F.J. (2010). Income Inequality, Trust, and Population Health in 33 Countries. American Journal of Public Health, 11, 2311-2315.

Fedotova, O. & Chigisheva, O. (2015). Comparative analysis: methodological optics in the ideological context. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 26, 57-82.

• , H. & Sang-Chin, Ch. (2011). Trust Working in Interpersonal Relationships: A Comparative Cultural Perspective with a Focus on East Asian Culture. Comparative Sociology, 10(3), 380-412.

Hung-Baesecke, F.Ch., Yi-Ru Ch.R. & Boyd, B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility, media source preference, trust, and public engagement:the informed public’s perspective. Public Relations Review, 4, 591-599.

Isiguro, I. & Okamoto, Y. (2013). Two ways to overcome social uncertainty in social support networks: A test of the emancipation theory of trust by comparing kin/nonkin relationships.  Japanese Psychological Research, 1, 1-11. 

Jovanović, V. (2016). Trust and subjective well-being: The case of Serbia. Personality & Individual Differences, 98, 284-288.

Kashima, I.T.,   Kashima, Yo., Farsides, E.S., Kim, T., Strack, U., Werth, F. & Masaki L.Yu. (2008). Culture, trust, and social networks. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 88-101.

Laborde, N.D., Van Dommelen-Gonzalez, E. & Minnis, A.M. (2014). Trust – that's a big one: intimate partnership values among urban Latino youth. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 9, 1009-1022.

• , J.M.,   Di Giacomo, M.,   Currow,  D.C. & Davidson, P.M.  (2014). Social capital in a lower socioeconomic palliative care population: a qualitative investigation of individual, community and civic networks and relations. BMC Palliative Care, 13, 1-18.

Mihajlova, A.V. & Popova, L.N. (2015). Sociological analysis of the quality of medical services in the Republic of Sakha Yakutia. Contemporary research of Social Problems, 7, 529-548.

Mohseni, M. & Lindstrom, M. (2007). Social capital, trust in the health-care system and self-rated health: The role of access to health care in a population-based study.  Social Science & Medicine, 7, 1373-1383.

Moravcsik, A. (2014). Trust, but Verify: The Transparency Revolution and Qualitative International Relations. Security Studies, 4, 663-688.

Pevnick, R.  (2009). Social Trust and the Ethics of Immigration Policy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 146-167.

Rouchier, J., O'Connor, M. & Requier-Desjardins, M. (2002). Building Context in Everyday Life. Foundations of Science, 4, 367-392.

Schilke, O., Reimann, M. & Cook, K.S. (2013). Effect of relationship experience on trust recovery following a breach. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 38, 15236-15241.

Tjonnis, F. (2002). Unity and society. Basic concepts of pure sociology. St.Petersburg: Vladimir Dal - 452 p.

Wang, M. & Ma, Ju. (2016). A novel recommendation approach based on users' weighted trust relations and the rating similarities. Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies & Applications, 10, 3981-3990.

Wilson, R.P. (2016) Trust but verify: Ministerial policy advisors and public servants in the Government of Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 3, 337-356.

Wu, J.W. & Francisco, Ch. (2014). A social network analysis trust–consensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 59, 97-107.

Yee, J. (2015). Social Capital in Korea: Relational Capital, Trust, and Transparency / International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 1, 30-47.

Zimmel, G. (1999). Philosophy of money. Moscow: Kanon-Press, 383 p.

Zolfaghar, K. & Aghaie, A. (2012). A syntactical approach for interpersonal trust prediction in social web applications: Combining contextual and structural data. Knowledge-Based Systems, 26, 93-102.