The paper analyzes the role of art in the process of upbringing of the rising generation. Revealing the specific nature of mechanisms of artistic images influencing the personality of an individual perceiving a work of art has brought about the analysis of the nature of symbols creation, thus giving grounds for the use of semiotic approach to the artistic idiom. The methodology of the study involves the systemic approach that allows considering art as a hierarchic system. The ethic trend of art has resulted in using the axiological approach to art which helps understanding the specific character of the value component of human relationships and leads to realizing that personality is a top value. The distinction of the study lies in updating the existing methodology of pedagogical science, which fulfills the need of upgrading the technology of artistic and pedagogical analysis and promotes understanding the concealed author's meanings built in into the image system of the art work allowing one to view the dynamics of the nature of human relationships captured in art by symbolic means. It has been determined that perception of art implies empathy for the character of the art work, interiorizing the social experience contained in art, adjusting the personal meanings up to the author's idea. It is proven that understanding and accepting "another" person in art promotes transferring the universal experience of human relationships into the daily life of the rising generation.

Abdel, A.K. (1970). L`islam et la question racial. UNESCO, 13 p.

Bahtin, M.M. (2000). The author and the hero. The philosophical foundations of human Sciences.  St.Petersburg: ABC book, 893 p.

Buber, M. (1966). Ich und Du. Direct access: http://www.plam.ru/camosov/duhovnost_-formy_principy_podhody_tom_i/p3.php

Burov, A.I. (1956) Aesthetic essence of the art. Moscow: Gosud, Publishing house Art, 292 p.

Cain, M. (2015). Musics of ‘The Other’: Creating musical identities and overcoming cultural boundaries in Australian music education. British Journal of Music Education, 32, 71-86.

Danina, M.M., Kiselnikova, N.V., Kuminskaya, E.A., Lavrova, E.A. & Markova, S.V. (2015). Theoretical and empirical approaches to using films as a means to increase communication efficiency. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 8(4), 23-34.

DeNora, T. (2003). Music sociology: getting the music into the action. British Journal of Music Education, 20(2), 165-178.

Hegel, G.W. (1826)  Philosophie der Kunst der Asthetik. Nach Hegel. Im Sommer 1826 Mitschrift Fridrich Carl Hermann Victor von Keller. Hrsg. A. Gethmann-Siefert und B. Collenberg-Plotnikov. Munchen: Wihhelm Fink, 76 p.

Lazutina, T.V. & Lazutin, N.K. (2015). The Language of Music as a Specific Semiotic Structure Asian Social Science, 11(7), 201-207.

Lesgaft, P.F. (1990). Selected pedagogical works. Moscow, 10-18.

Malyukov, A.N. (1999). Psychology experiences and artistic development of the individual. Dubna: Printing Centre «Phoenix», 526 p.

Medushevsky, V.V. (1976). About regularities and means of artistic influence of music. Moscow: Music, 232 p.

Melik-Pashaev, A.A. (2000). The world of the artist. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 269 p.

Nemensky, B M. (1981). The wisdom of beauty: on the problem of aesthetic education. Moscow: Education, 255 p.

Oehler, E. (1999). Kinder brauchen kinder. Bildung und Wissenschaft, 4, 2-6.

Oehrle, E. (1996).  Intercultural education through music: towards a culture of tolerance. British Journal of Music Education, 13(2), 95-100.

Ovsyannikova,  O.A. (2008). Forming tolerant attitude of the senior preschool children to peers by means of art. Tyumen: Togirro, 28-32.

Ovsyannikova, O.A. (2016). Development of the art experience of teenagers by the ways of art synthesis. Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(8), 15-18.

Plutarh (1927-1975) Moralia. Harvard: Harvard University Press. 480 p.

Smakovskaya, N.E. (2015). Realizing potential of art in the system of engineering education. International Journal of Advanced Studies, 5, 8-16.

Tagiltseva, N.G. (2002). Art in raising consciousness of students. Moscow: Editorial office of the journal «Art and education», 554 p.

Torshilova,  E.M. (1989). Aesthetic education in the family. Moscow: Art, 144 p.

Vinogradova, N.A. (1972). Chinese landscape painting. Moscow:  Art, 160 p.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1968). Psychology of art. Moscow: Publishing house Art, 480 p.

Маslow, А.Н. (1987). Мotivation and Personality. New York: Addison-Wesley, 349 p.