The paper considers key risks of cultural and civilizational integration of the Russian-Ukrainian border region. Proceeding from the sociological surveys conducted, the following typical cultural and civilizational identities of the population of border regions of Russia and Ukraine are singled out: Russian, Ukrainian, Slavic, European, mondialist and Eurasian. The first of the risks found is discrete perception of social time and space. For the bulk of representatives of the regional communities, social time breaks down into parts acting like periods that are devoid of the shared logics and are contrasting towards each other. The second is associated with chronotope pattern structure consisting in the presence of cognitive and value-related dissonance which characterizes the consciousness of the population – this is expressed in acceptance of value attitudes not only mismatching but even opposing each other frequently. The third risk consists in incongruity and controversy of heterostereotypes that are emotionally colored set ideas of communication subjects about their counterparties. Irrelevance of ideas about the future acts as the last risk that is caused by asynchrony of social processes in the area which used to be united that is manifested both at interstate and regional levels.

Adler, A. (2011). Social Interest: A Challenge to Mankind. New York: Faber and Faber Ltd, 224 p.

Anisimov, O.S. (2012). Identity: the types and conditions of their implementation on the basis of civilizational identity. World of Psychology, 1(69), 12-18.

Bauman, Z. (2002). Idealized society. Moscow: Logos, 390 p.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage, 260 p.

Chuprov, V I., Zubok, Yu.A. & Williams, K.Y. (2003). The society of risk. Moscow: Science, 161 p.

Douglas, M. & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 224 p.

Erikson, E. (1996). Identity: youth and crisis. New York: W.W.Norton & Co, 344 p.

Freud, A. (1936). Das Ich und die Abwehrmechanismen. Berlin: Fischer Taschenbuch, 217 p.

Freud, S. (1921). Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. Berlin: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, 265 p.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 256 p.

Golovnyova, E.V. (2013). Regional identity as a form of collective identity and its structure. Labyrinth. Journal of Social and Humanitarian Studies, 5, 42-50.

Gott, V.S. & Ursul, A.D. (1971). Certainty and uncertainty as a form of scientific knowledge. Moscow: Knowledge, 49 p.

Hogg, M.A. (2014). From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 338-342.

Jung, C.G. (2009). The Red Book. New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 600 p.

Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co, 13-32.

Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 178

Moscovici, S. (1984). The Phenomena of Social Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 170 p.

Rapaport, D. (1967). The conceptual model of psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books, 431 p.

Tajfel, N. (1981). Human groups and Social categories: Studies in Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 253 p.

Turner, J.C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in group processes: Theory and research, 2, 77-122.

Wildavsky, А. & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of Risk Perception: Who Fears What and Why? Daeudalus. 4 (119), 41-60.

Yadov, V.A. (1994). Social identification in the crisis society. Journal of Sociology, 1, 35-51.

Yanitsky, O.N. (2003). Risk Sociology. Moscow: LVS, 192 p.

Zubkov, V.I. (2009). Sociological theory of risk. Moscow: Academic prospect, 380 p.

Zubok, Yu.A. (2007). Risk phenomenon in sociology. Experience of the youth study. Moscow: Thought, 222 p.