The article analyzes reading as a sociocultural phenomenon in terms of the philosophy of culture. The purpose of the study is the identification of reading functions in contemporary culture. Research concept is defined by reading comprehension as a multifunctional phenomenon. In the course of reading genesis research it is revealed that reading performs informational and communicative, socializing, worldview, culturesaving, ideological, axiological, aesthetic, expressive, ritually applying, semiotic, educational, suggestive functions. It is proved that among the functions carried out by reading in the life of an individual (company) informational-communicative function is a leading one. The role of reading in today's culture is not only in the storage and transmission of specific information with the help of specific symbolic means, but also in the creation of etiquette regulations, moral guidelines of culture and shaping real, practically useful strategies for successful behavior. In the course of studying the nature of reading, the view on reading as a kind of topical unfolding dialogue of semantic structures of the author with the reader’s semantic structures representing a certain experience of understanding the author's thoughts, and leading to the generation of reader's senses is formed. It has been shown that reading serves as a basic skill which is necessary for human life in the sociocultural environment.

Bakhtin, M.M. (1988). Aesthetics of verbal creativity. Mosсow: Art, 424 p.

Brudnyy, A.A. (1998). Psychological hermeneutics. Moscow: Knowledge, 336 p.

Derrida, J. (1967). Of Grammatology. Paris: Edition de Minuit, 416 p.

Dilthey, W. (2010). Hermeneutics and the Study of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 411 p.

Eco, U. (1979). Lector in fabula. The interpretative cooperation in narrative texts. Milano: Bompiani, 239 p.

Foucault, M. (2002). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Hove: Psychology Press, 32-34.

Fromm, E. (2005). To have or to be? London: Bloomsbury Academic, 216 p.

Ingarden, R., Peter J. & McCormick (1985). Selected works in the aesthetics. Munich: Philosophia Verlag, 364 p.

Kagan, M.S. (1997). Philosophy of culture. Saint-Petersburg: Petropolis, 205 p.

Karsavin, L.P. (1991). The state and the crisis of democrac]. New world, 1, 189-199.

Lazutina, T.V. & Lazutin, N.K. (2015). The language of music as a specific semiotic structure. Asian social science, 7, 201-207.

Lazutina, T.V. & Lazutin, N.K. (2016).  The polyfunctionality of design language in the education system of the design-student. International journal of environmental & science education, 10, 3412-3422.

Leontyev, A.N. (2005). Activities. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Sense, 587 p.

Leontyev, D.A. (2007). Sense psychology: nature, structure and dynamics of the sense of reality. Moscow: Sense, 425 p.

Lotman, Yu.M. (2010). Semiosphere. Saint-Petersburg: Art-SPb, 318 p.

McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 518 p.

Peirce, C.S. (1958). Collected Papers. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1944 p.

Piaget, J. (1953) The Origins of Intelligence in Children. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 63-66.

Saussure, F. (2011). Course in General Linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press, 22-28.

Schleiermacher, F. (1998). Hermeneutics and Criticism and Other Writings (Hermeneutik und Kritik mit besonderer Beziehung auf das Neue Testament, 1838). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 312 p.

Solsberiyskiy, I. (1985). Polycratic or about fun of light and covenants of philosophers. Moscow: Book, 50-64.

Vygotskiy, L.S. (2012). Thinking and speaking. Moscow: Labirint, 397 p.

Wittgenstein, L.J. (1989). Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 890 p.

Zapesotskiy, A.S. (1996). Humanitarian culture and arts education. Saint-Peterburg: Publishing house of Saint-Petersburg Humanitarian University of Trade Unions, 334 p.

Zakirova, A.F. (2006). Educational Hermeneutics. Moscow: Shalva Amonashvili Publishing House, 664 p.