(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 9753-9771 | Article Number: ijese.2016.693
Published Online: November 01, 2016
Abstract
The aim of the article is to study the nature of liberalization as a specific economic process, which is formed and developed under the influence of the changing conditions of the globalization and integration processes in the society, as well as to identify the characteristic differences in the processes of liberalization of Turkey and Azerbaijan economies (using the method of comparative analysis of these countries' development indices). The objectives of this study: the characterization of the liberalization process as a specific economic process; a comparative analysis of the Turkey and Azerbaijan economic development conditions; the improvement of the theoretical justification of influence the process of economic liberalization on the development of society. The article presents the comparative analysis of the Turkey and Azerbaijan economic development conditions by using new research method as index of leftness (rightness) of economy. It was revealed that the Azerbaijan economy compared with the economy of Turkey is using more “right” methods of economy regulation. The Turkish economy is more prone to fluctuations in the studied parameters, at the same time, a main way of Turkish economy development is the direction towards increased liberalization, while the simultaneous growth of indicators of the human development. In this context, the Azerbaijani economy is more liberalized and less regulated.
Keywords: Index of Leftness (Rightness) of economy, Human development index, liberalization, state intervention, Comparative analysis, Market relations, Economic freedom
References
Abdymanapov, S. A., Toxanova, A. N., Galiyeva, A. H., Abildina, A. Sh., & Aitkaliyeva, A. M. (2016). Development of Public-Private Partnership in the Republic of Kazakhstan. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1113-1126.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2013). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. London: Profile Books.
Ahmed, F. Z., Greenleaf, A., & Sacks, A. (2014). The paradox of export growth in areas of weak governance: The case of the readymade garment sector in Bangladesh. World Development, 56, 258-271.
Based upon "Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises" report designed by the World Bank (See: Doing Business 2014: Dealing üith Construction Permits. Direct access: http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploretopics/dealing-with-construction-permits; latest review-August 2014).
Bumann, S., Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2013). Financial Liberalization and Economic Growth: A Meta-analysis. Journal of International Money and Finance 33, 255-281.
Carrieri, F., Chaieb, I., & Errunza, V. (2013). Do Implicit Barriers Matter for Globalization? Review of Financial Studies 26, 1594-1739.
Co-convener of "Neoliberalism and Democracy beyond the Economic Crisis" research group. (2015). Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. Direct access: http://www.vanleer.org.il/sites/files/ MANDELKERN%20CV%20updated%2010.4.16.pdf
Cohen, J. N. (2010). How Prosperous was the World Economy in the Age of Neoliberalism? Working Paper at Munich Personal RePEc Archive. University Library of Munich, Germany. Direct access: http://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/22437.html
Cohen, J. N., & Centeno, M. A. (2006). Neoliberalism and Patterns of Economic Performance, 1980-2000. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 606, 32-67.
Greenwald, J. (1989, Monday). Harvard Debt Doctor's Controversial Cure. Magazine "Time" Nov. 06. Direct access: http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,958962,00.html
Heath, R., & Mobarak, A. M. (2014, Sept.). Manufacturing Growth and the Lives of Bangladeshi Women. Cato Institute. Research Briefs in Economic Policy, 10, 72-79.
Hidalgo, J. C. (2014, Janu. 23). Growth without Poverty Reduction: The Case of Costa Rica. Cato Institute. Economic Development Bulletin, 18, 23-28.
Hill, R. V. (2010). Liberalization and Producer Price Risk: Examining Subjective Expectations in the Ugandan Coffee Market. Journal of African Economics, 19(4), 433-458.
McCartney, M. (2015). Economic growth and development: A comparative introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Musumba, M., & Rajorshi, S. G. (2013). Transmission of World Prices to Ugandan Coffee Growers in a Liberalised Economy. Development Policy Review, 31(2), 219-234.
Müzəffərli, N. (2014, Səh. 63). İqtisadiyyatın sosialyönlüyü sağçı və solçu sistemlərdə. Şərq-Qərb Nəşriyyat Evi. Bakı.
Sally, R. (2013, June 5). Asia's Story of Growing Economic Freedom by Razeen Sally. Cato Institute. Policy Analysis, 725, 1-12. Direct access: http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/ pa725-revised.pdf
Schaefer, P. F., & Schaefer, C. (2014, Dec. 3). An Innovative Approach to Land Registration in the Developing World: Using Technology to Bypass the Bureaucracy. Cato Institute. Policy Analysis, 765, 1-12. Direct access: http://object.cato. org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa765.pdf
State Statistical Committee (SSC) [Azerbaijan] and Macro International Inc. (2008, May). Azerbaijan Demographic and Health Survey 2006. Calverton, Maryland, USA: State Statistical Committee and Macro International Inc. Direct access: http://dhsprogram.com/ pubs/pdf/ FR195/FR195.pdf
Swaminathan, S., Aiyar, A., Debroy, B., & Bhandari, L. (2014). Economic Freedom of the States of India 2013. New Delhi: Friedrich Naumann Foundation and Cato Institute.