(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 9741-9752 | Article Number: ijese.2016.692
Published Online: November 01, 2016
Abstract
This research analyzes the illegal and unreasonable practice of court rulings that aim to accelerate the major construction of problematic long-delayed apartment blocks in the Russian Federation. The authors express their critical attitude to the widespread wrongful approach that violates the laws in effect and allows courts to apply branch-specific legal regulation to public relations, which should be regulated by different laws. The authors support the supremacy of law over the administrative and economic expedience, which often prevails in modern Russia, and analyze the legal status of the victims of unscrupulous real estate developers, including that of persons who took mortgage loans and bore additional costs due to increased interest rates, and the financial losses of banks that were forced to create additional reserves for potential losses from bad debts with security in the form of apartments in buildings, the construction of which was delayed indefinitely.
Keywords: major construction, apartment block, unfinished apartment, homeowner association, urban planning law
References
Filippov P.M., Inshakova A.O., and Goncharov A.I. (Eds.) 2016. Housing Law: a textbook. Moscow: Jurisprudence Publishing House.
Order of the Ministry of Regional Development of Russia dated 20.09.2013 No. 403 “On the Approval of the Criteria for Classifying Citizens, whose Funds Were Used to Construct Apartment Blocks and whose Rights Were Violated, as Aggrieved Persons, and the Rules for Registering Citizens, whose Funds Were Used to Construct Apartment Blocks and whose Rights Were Violated” // “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” (Russian Newspaper), No. 286, 19.12.2013.
Housing Code of the Russian Federation dated 29.12.2004 No. 188-FZ (revised on 06.02.2016) // “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” (Russian Newspaper), No. 1, 12.01.2005.
Government Decree dated 28.01.2006 No. 47 (revised on 25.3.2015, amended as of 02.03.2016) “On the Approval of the Provision for Recognizing Premises as Housing Accommodations, Recognizing Housing Accommodations as Unsuitable for Dwelling, and Recognizing an Apartment Block as Failing and Subject to Demolition or Reconstruction” // “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” (Russian Newspaper), No. 28, 10.02.2006.
Urban Development Code of the Russian Federation dated 29.12.2004 No. 190-FZ (revised on 12.30.2015) (revised and extended, in force from 10.01.2016) // “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” (Russian Newspaper), No. 290, 30.12.2004.
Government Decree dated 13.08.2006 No. 491 (revised on 12.25.2015) “On the Approval of Rules of Maintenance for Communal Property in an Apartment Block and Rules of Changing the Payment for the Maintenance and Repairs of Residential Accommodations in Case of Delivery of Service and Performance of Works for Management, Maintenance, and Repairs of Communal Property in an Apartment Block of Substandard Quality and (or) with Delays that Exceed the Set Duration” // “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” (Russian Newspaper), No. 184, 22.08.2006.
The Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part One) dated 30.11.1994 No. 51-FZ (revised on 05.23.2016) // “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” (Russian Newspaper), No. 238-239, 08.12.1994.
Ruling of the Krasnooktyabrskiy District Court of Volgograd on Case No. 2-4393 / 2015 dated November 30, 2015.
Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part Two) dated 26.01.1996 No. 14-FZ (revised on 23.05.2016) // “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” (Russian Newspaper), No. 23, 06.02.1996, No. 24, 07.02.1996, No. 25, 08.02.1996, No. 27, 10.2.1996.
Kryukova E. M. et al. Financing of social housing stock in Russia and abroad // World Applied Sciences Journal. – 2014. – Vol. 30. – No. 12. – P. 1746-1748.
Borisova E. I., Polishchuk L., Peresetsky A. Collective management of residential housing in Russia: The importance of being social // Journal of Comparative Economics. – 2014. – Vol. 42. – No. 3. – P. 609-629.
Mah A. Housing the New Russia // Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews. – 2014. – Vol. 43. – No. 3. – P. 434-435.
Stephens M. Housing the New Russia //Housing Studies. – 2014. – Vol. 29. – No. 4. – P. 568-570.
Flaming K. H. Review: Housing the New Russia // Journal of Planning Education and Research. – 2015. – Vol. 35. – No. 2. – P. 230-232.
Curtin E. Housing the New Russia (Zavisca) // Anthropology of East Europe Review. – 2015. – Vol. 33. – No. 1. – P. 87-89.
Moiseev A. K., Cherkovets M. V. Forecast of mortgage-lending development in Russia subject to socioeconomic factors //Studies on Russian Economic Development. – 2014. – Vol. 25. – No. 5. – P. 509-513.
Sarsengali A. Abdymanapov, Aigul N. Toxanova, Alma H. Galiyeva, Ainur Sh. Abildina & Anar M. Aitkaliyeva. Development of Public-Private Partnership in the Republic of Kazakhstan. IEJME-Mathematics Education. Volume 11 Issue 5 (2016) pp. 1113-1126
Ulyanova O. A Research Methodology of the Housing Crisis in Modern Russia //World Applied Sciences Journal. – 2013. – Vol. 25. – No. 8. – P. 1209-1216.
Zavisca J. R. Housing the new Russia. – Cornell University Press, 2012.