“Blame” Concept in Phraseology: Cognitive-Semantic Aspect (Based on the French Language)

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Zalavina & Kisel, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Zalavina, T.Y. & Kisel, O.V. (2016). “Blame” Concept in Phraseology: Cognitive-Semantic Aspect (Based on the French Language). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(17), 9693-9703.

Harvard
In-text: (Zalavina and Kisel, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Zalavina, T. and Kisel, O. (2016). “Blame” Concept in Phraseology: Cognitive-Semantic Aspect (Based on the French Language). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(17), pp. 9693-9703.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Zalavina and Kisel 2016)
Your Bibliography: Zalavina, Tatyana Y. and Olesya V. Kisel (2016). "“Blame” Concept in Phraseology: Cognitive-Semantic Aspect (Based on the French Language)". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (17):9693-9703.

Abstract

Phraseology is one of the basic and most important objects of study in cognitive linguistics. The article deals with verbal fixed phrases in their correlation with the cognitive structure of knowledge – a concept. The used definitional analysis method to identify the basic notions of the conceptual content of the concept of blame and basic representative lexical units of the analyzed concept. They also applied component analysis method to identify the semantic features of French phraseological units, containing the concept of blame, as well as to analyze the relatedness of phraseological units to the studied concept. The methods revealed that basic understanding of the “blame” concept demonstrates the direct relationship of this concept with the action. Therefore, it is presented mainly in verbal phrase ologisms. Based on the used methods, the researchers identified a set of basic representative lexical units of the analyzed concept: a reprimand, reproach, criticism, disapproval. Component analysis of verbal phraseological units (204 units) within the concept of blame made it possible to identify the lexical sets, reflecting the denotative situation and denotative cause of the blame process: “Body Parts”, “Food”, “Flora and fauna”, “Household units”.

Keywords: Verbal phraseological units, “blame” concept, semantic features, dictionary definition

References

Arnold, I.V. (2011). Basic Research in Linguistics, 144 p. Ukrain: Librokom.

Babushkin, A.P. (2001). The Concepts of Different Types of Vocabulary and Phraseology, and Methods of their Detection. Methodological Problems of Cognitive Linguistics. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Press, 52-113.

Delbecque, N. (ed.). (2002). Linguistique Cognitive: Comprendre Comment Fonctionne le Language, 348 p. Bruxelles: De Boeck, Duculot.

Forrester M.A.( 1996) Psychology of Language. A Critical Introduction: Nw Delhi. –– 137 p.

Godard, G., & Wierzbicka, A. (2010). Semantics and Cognition. Wires: Cognitive Science, 2, 208-219.

Godard, G., & Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains. Languages and Cultures, 352 p.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Goodenough D.R.(1982) Cognitive styles: essence and origins field dependence and field independence. N.-Y., . P. 12-33.

Guiraud, P. (1969). La sémantique. «Que sais-je?», 118 p Paris: Guiraud. PUF.

Kopylenko, M.M., & Popova, Z.D. (2010). Essays on General Phraseology: Phraseological Combinations in the Language System. Edition 2, 192 p. Ukrain: Librokom.

Masalimova, A. R., Porchesku, G. V. & Liakhnovitch, T. L. (2016) Linguistic Foundation of Foreign Language Listening Comprehension. IEJME-Mathematics Education. 11(1), 123-131

Maruzo, Zh. (2004). Glossary of Linguistic Terms. Edition. 2nd, rev. 440 p. Russia: Editorial URSS.

Popova, Z.D., & Sternin, I.A. (2007). Semantic and Cognitive Analysis of Language. Monograph. 250 p. Voronezh: Istoki.

Piirainen E. Phrasemes from a cultural semiotic perspective // Phraseologie: ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenossischer Forschung = Phraseology: an international handbook of contemporary research / hrsg. von / edited by H. Burger, D. Dobrovol'skij, P. Kühn, N.R. Norrick. − Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2007. − Hb. 1. − Vol. 1. − S. 208-219.

Rat M. (1999) Dictionnaire des expressions et locutions traditionnelles / M. Rat. – Paris: Larousse,– 446 p.

Rey A. (2003) Dictionnaire des expressions et locutions / A. Rey, S. Chantreau. – Paris: Le Robert,– 1086 p.

Telia, V.N. (2004). Culture Factor and Phraseological Characters-Microtexts Reproducibility. Sokrovennye Smisly. Slovo. Tekst. Kultura: A Collection of Articles in Honor of N.D. Arutyunova, 880 p.

Vorkachev, S.G. (2003). Cultural Concepts and Their Value. Proceedings of the Kuban State Technological University, Humanitarian sciences, 17(2), 268-276. Krasnodar.

Yarovaya, V.N. (ed.). (2002). Linguistics. Great Encyclopedic Dictionary. Great Russian Encyclopedia, 709 p. Russia.

Zalavina, T.Yu., & Shorohova, L.A. (2016). Features of the Cognitive Approach to the Study of Language Phraseological Fund. Modern Trends in the Development of Science and Technology: Periodical Scientific Collection. Materials of XIII International Scientific and Practical Conference, 4-5, 49-53. April 30. Belgorod.