(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 9614-9633 | Article Number: ijese.2016.682
Published Online: October 29, 2016
Abstract
Over the past three decades, Russia has undergone profound socio-economic reforms, often initiated not by the population itself, but by the authorities. However, it is the population, its mass consciousness that has become the main object of deep transformations, expressed not only in a change of lifestyle, but also in the value orientations. Despite the strengthening of market relations, the expected economic effect in Russia has been failed to be achieved. One of the main reasons for this is the inertial mass public consciousness. On the basis of the all-Russian sociological study the article carried out an analysis of the mass consciousness of the Russian population structure – historical, patriotic, legal – and showed its inconsistency hindering the consolidation of the population within the established new political and ideological system framework.
Keywords: historical consciousness, civil identity, social status, education, cultural level
References
Dambueva, A. (2014). The development of the students’ creativity in the study of the general physics course. TSPU Bulletin, 1(129). p. 22-24.
Berkimbaev, K., Sarybayeva, A., Ormanova, G., Usembaeva, I., Ramankulov, Sh. (2013). Revisiting the use of electronic educational resources for preparation of future physics teachers. Life Science J., 10(10s). p. 105-108.
Berkimbaev, K., Saribaeva, A., Usembayeva, I., Ramankulov, Sh. (2013). Teaching to use information and computer technology in preparation of competitive specialists. Materials of the II International Research and Practice Conference: Science, Technology and Higher Education, Westwood, Canada. p. 425-429.
Berkіmbaev, K., Ormanova, G. (2013). The use of computer models in the process of teaching physics to students. Bulletin of Russian Peoples’ Friendship University. p. 88-92.
Chandra, V., Watters, J. (2012). Re-thinking physics teaching with web-based learning. Computers and Education, 58(1). p. 631–640.
Gelade, G.A. (2002). Creativity style, personality, and artistic endeavor. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monograph, 128. p. 213-234.
Kabylbekov, K., Ormanova, G. (2006). Computer models of experiments and demonstrations on the optics course “Electricity. Part 2” and their application in the learning process for the formation of the steady interest of students to the physics. Research works of the M. Auezov South Kazakhstan State University, 11-12. p. 91-96.
Lee, H., Kim, K. (2014). Relationships Between Bilingualism and Adaptive Creative Style, Innovative Creative Style, and Creative Strengths among Korean American Students”. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4). p. 402-407. kkim.wmwikis.net/file/view/Lee_Kim_2010.pdf.
Leonard, D., Swap, W. (2013). Forstering creativity: expert solutions to everyday challenge. Harvard University Press.
Ormanova, G., Berkimbaev, K., Kurbanbekov, B., Ramankulov, Sh., Bimaganbetova, A. (2013). Formation of Creative Thinking of Students on Physics by Means of Electronic Resources. AWER Procedia Information Technology & Computer Science 04. p. 570-575.
Ormanova, G., Sarybaeva, A., Ramankulov, Sh. (2014). Electronic textbook on "Optics". Turkestan.
Ramankulov, Sh., Turmambekov, T., Ormanova, G. (2015). Optics Workbook. Turkestan. 150 P.
Zinkevich-Evstigneeva, T, Grabenko, T. (2013). Workshop on the Creative therapy. Saint-Petersburg: Speech Publishers.
Popkov, V., Korzhuev, A. (2004). Theory and practice of the professional education: Tutorial for the system of the additional education. Moscow: Academic Project.
Popova, V., Kruglova, Y. (2011). Creative Pedagogy. Methodology, Theory, Practice, 2nd revised and enlarged edition. Moscow: BINOM, Knowledge Laboratory.
Robinson, K. (2006). Ken Robinson says schools kill creativity.. http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_Robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.
Hoque, S., Alam, S. (2010). The Role of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Delivering Higher Education. International Education Studies, 2(3). p. 97-106. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n2p97.
Ramankulov, Sh., Berkimbaev, K., Bekbayev, S., Abdumanapov, U., Ormanova, G., Sarybaeva, A. (2015). Formation of Creative Thinking of Future Teachers on Physics by Means of Information Technologie. 2nd International Conference on Civil, Materials and Environmental Sciences (CMES 2015). Atlantis Press.
MacDowell, K., Michael, R. (2014). Beginning with the totally unexpected: Organic creativity in teaching physics. In: J.Piirto (Ed.). Organic creativity in the classroom: Teaching to intuition in academics and the arts, Waco, TX, Prufrock Press. pp. 59-74.
Sternberg, R., Grigorenko, E., Jarvin, L. (2015). Teaching for Wisdom, Intelligence, Creativity, and Success. First Skyhorse Publishing Edition. 192 P.
Jones, R.H., Richards, J.C. (2015). Creativity in Language Teaching: Perspectives from Research and Practice. New York and London: Routledge. 284 p.
Carlile, O., Jordan, A. (2013). Approaches to Creativity: A Guide for Teacher. Open University Press. 328 P.
McLellan, R., Galton, M., Steward, S., Page, (2012). Ch. The impact of creative initiatives on well-being: a literature review.
Johnson, D. (2015). Teaching outside the lines: Developing creativity in every learner. Corwin Press, 144 P.
Gramond, B. (2005). Fostering creativity in gifted students. Prufrock Press Inc. 47 P.
Rajput, J. S. (2004). National Council of Educational Research and Training (India).