Images of Ideology: Social and Cognitive Sense

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Volkov, Khunagov, Kumykov, Imgrunt & Gribov , 2016)
Your Bibliography: Volkov, Y.G., Khunagov, R.D., Kumykov, .M., Imgrunt, S.I. & Gribov , .Y. (2016). Images of Ideology: Social and Cognitive Sense . International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(16), 9573-9585.

Harvard
In-text: (Volkov, Khunagov, Kumykov, Imgrunt and Gribov , 2016)
Your Bibliography: Volkov, Y., Khunagov, R., Kumykov, ., Imgrunt, S. and Gribov , . (2016). Images of Ideology: Social and Cognitive Sense . International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(16), pp. 9573-9585.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Volkov, Khunagov, Kumykov, Imgrunt and Gribov 2016)
Your Bibliography: Volkov, Yury Grigoryevich, Rashid Dumalichevich Khunagov, Auyes Mukhamedovich Kumykov, Svetlana Ivanovna Imgrunt and Denis Yevgenyevich Gribov (2016). "Images of Ideology: Social and Cognitive Sense ". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (16):9573-9585.

Abstract

It would be difficult to preserve the achievements of the civilization and to discuss the future of humanity beyond the structure of ideological knowledge. The objective vision of reality implies the involvement of ideological dimension into the structure of human thoughts and actions as a precondition for national, state and cultural identity and for the movement toward the new humanistic social paradigm that would include the traditions of reasonableness, progress and the capability to “differentiate” between reasonableness and instrumental rationality which, when mixed, make social reflection inadequate to the purposes of social creativity. To what extent are the images of ideology “filled” with social and cognitive tools? What do the images of ideology reflect: reality, knowledge or myth? The authors of this study aim to give answers to these and to other questions.

Keywords: Sociology of the Future, Social Subjectness, Social Thought, Methodological Approaches, Methodological Turn

References

Beck, U. (2000). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Moscow.

Fedotova, V.G. (2005). Good society. Moscow.

Foucault, M. (2002). Intellectuals and Power. Moscow.

General sociology: Anthology. (2006). Moscow.

Habermas, J. (2003). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Moscow.

Habermas, J. (2007). Science and technology as ideology. Moscow,

Heller, L. (2003). Niqueux M. Utopia in Russia. Saint Petersburg.

Kara-Murza, S.G. (2002). Ideology and its mother science. Moscow.

Kasavin, I.T., Shchavelev, S.P. (2004). Everyday routine analysis. Moscow.

Losev, A.F. (1976). Problem of symbols or realistic art. Moscow.

Mannheim, K. (1994). The diagnosis of our time. Moscow.

Mills, C.W. (2001). The Sociological Imagination. Moscow,

New postindustrial wave in the West. (1999). Moscow,

Rutkevich, A.M. (1999). What is conservatism? Moscow.

Smith, R. (2007). The History of the Human Sciences. Moscow.

Volkov, Yu.G. (1995). Personality and humanism (Sociological aspect). Chelyabinsk.

Volkov, Yu.G. (2011). Creativity: historical breakthrough in Russia. Moscow.

Wallerstein, I. (2003). The end of the world as we know it. Moscow.

Žižek, S. (2003). The Fragile Absolute. Moscow.

Žižek, S. (2006). Some Politically Incorrect Reflections on Violence in France and Related Matters. Logos, 2.