(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 9560-9572 | Article Number: ijese.2016.678
Published Online: October 28, 2016
Abstract
The objective of the study is to investigate the effects produced by confessional belonging on the conditions of the ethnic identities of the diasporas and on the character of the inter-ethnic relations in regional communities. Religious identity can reveal itself both as a factor of inter-ethnic integration and as an additional indicator of ethnic and cultural identity that increases the distance between different groups of the population. The investigation has been developed based on the analysis of statistical and sociological data that illustrate the existence of confessionally heterogeneous ethnic diasporas in regional community. It has been established that in the Rostov region, the hub region of the South of Russia, confessional identity presents an additional factor of maintaining the ethnic identities within the ethnic and cultural communities as follows: Jews, Armenians, Greeks, Poles, Georgians, Assyrians and Koreans. The majority of these groups possess confessional institutions of their own, though the degree of consolidation with them is different. Thus, while for Jewish and Armenian diasporas of the Don the institutions of national religion are the key forms of maintaining their identities, for Poles the importance of the confessional factor is lower, and for Greeks and Georgians this factor is purely symbolic affecting just a negligibly small part of the community. At the same time it has been established that Islamic identity of a number of diasporas that live in the territory of the Rostov region and in many other regions of the South of Russia is practically meaningless in term0s of strengthening the identities of the ethnic communities, but, nevertheless it produces an effect of cultural differentiation on the system of social interactions in the environment of the regional community.
Keywords: Diaspora, Identity, Confession, Ethic and Confessional Identity
References
Astvatsaturova, M.A. (2002). Diasporas in the Russian Federation: formation and government (North Caucasian region). Rostov-on-Don – Pyatigorsk, SKAGS.
Auswertung der ersten bundesweiten Umfrage unter entwicklungspolitisch aktiven MDO. (2011). Hannover: Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Eine-Welt Landesnetzwerke in Deutschland.
Barkov, F.A., Serikov, A.V., Chernous, V.V. (2013). Competing of Civic and Ethnic Forms of Identity in Russia (Based on Regional Empirical Studies). World Applied Sciences Journal 27 (3), 324-328.
Basic results of all-Russia census of population in 2010. (2012). Statistical book. Rostov-on-Don, Rostovstat.
Bazhenova, E.U., Serikov, A.V., Serikova, I.B., Stukalova, D.N. (2015).Conflict Potential of Interethnic Relations and Migration Processes in the Russian Regions: Ethnoinstitutional Methodology of Analyses. Asian Social Science, 11(7), 252-258.
Bedrik, A.V., Serikov, A.V. (2015). Ethnoconfessional relations in the context of national security: regional aspect. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge. 11.
Bedrik, A.V., Shchukina, Ye.L. (2016). Sociocultural reproduction of traditional confessional minorities (exemplified by Catholic community in the Rostov region). Scientific Thought of Caucasus, No. 2(86), 37-46. DOI: 10.18522/2072-0181-86-2-37-46.
Count of population in the Rostov region by city regions and municipal districts as of 01.01.2015. (2015). Statistical Book. Rostov-on-Don, Rostovstat.
Dyatlov, A.V., Kumykov, A.M., Lubsky, A.V., Serikov, A.V., Posukhova, O.Y. (2015). National Security: Paradigmatic Fundamentals of Research Practices. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 6, (5 S4), 266-272.
Toker, E. (2013). Der Paritätische als Dachverband der Selbstorganisationen von Migrantinnen und Migranten. WISO Discurs. Migrantenorganisationen Engagement, Transnationalität und Integration. Pp 76-82. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/wiso/10092.pdf
Hall, M., Jackson, P.T. (Eds.). (2007). Civilizational Identity. The Production and Reproduction of “Civilizations” in International Relations. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230608924.
Interaction between the government of Rostov region and the religious communities. Information on official site of the Government of the Rostov region. http://www.donland.ru/Socialnaya-sfera/Religiya/?pageid=75380.
Khastyan, L.L. (2002). Specifics of social and cultural adaptation of Armenian migrants in the Krasnodar region. Ethnic conflicts and their reconciliation: interaction between science, authorities and civil society. Moscow-Stavropol, SGY.
Kretsedemas, P. (2012). The Immigration Crucible. New York, Columbia University Press.
Lingeman, R. (Ed.). (2014). This Immigrant Nation: Articles from The Nation 1868 - Present. New York, The Nation Company.
National distribution of the population in the Rostov region. Results of all-Russia census of population in 2002, Statistical Book. Rostov-on-Don, Rostovstat, 2005.
Selitskiy, A.I. (2008). Poles in Kuban: historical essays. Krasnodar: Kuban State University.
Shadrina, A.V. (2011). Catholicism in the territories of Priazovye and Lower Don. Relga. Scientific Culturological Journal, 6. http://www.relga.ru/Environ/WebObjects/tgu-www.woa/wa/Main?level1=main&level2=articles&textid=2877
Volkov, Yu.G. (Ed.). (2011). Armenians in the South of Russia: experience of sociological investigations: Collective monograph. Moscow: Social and Humanitarian Knowledge.
Weiss, K. (2013). Migrantenorganisationen und Staat. Anerkennung, Zusammenarbeit, Förderung. WISO Discurs. Migrantenorganisationen Engagement, Transnationalität und Integration. Pp. 21-31. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/wiso/10092.pdf
West, D. (2011).Brain Gain: Rethinking U.S. Immigration Policy. Washington D.C., Brookings Institution Press,